GNU bug report logs - #9132
24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows

Previous Next

Packages: w32, emacs;

Reported by: sds <at> gnu.org

Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:14:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 24.0.50

Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: sds <at> gnu.org
Cc: 9132 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:26:32 +0300
> From: Sam Steingold <sds <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: 9132 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:08:08 -0400
> 
> > * Eli Zaretskii <ryvm <at> tah.bet> [2011-07-22 09:00:30 +0300]:
> >
> > So the symbol is bound, but Emacs thinks it's not a function?  What
> > does this print?
> >
> >   "./../src/oo/i386/emacs.exe" -batch -l ../lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el
> > --eval "(print (symbol-function 'batch-byte-compile))"
> 
> (closure (byte-compile--for-effect print-gensym-alist byte-compile--outbuffer by
> te-compiler-error-flag byte-compile-free-assignments byte-compile-free-reference
> s t) (&optional noforce) "Run `byte-compile-file' on the files remaining on the
> command line.
> Use this from the command line, with `-batch';
> it won't work in an interactive Emacs.
> Each file is processed even if an error occurred previously.
> For example, invoke \"emacs -batch -f batch-byte-compile $emacs/ ~/*.el\".
> If NOFORCE is non-nil, don't recompile a file that seems to be
> already up-to-date." (defvar command-line-args-left) (if (not noninteractive) (e
> rror "`batch-byte-compile' is to be used only with -batch")) (let ((error nil))
> (while command-line-args-left (if (file-directory-p (expand-file-name (car comma
> nd-line-args-left))) (let (source dest) (dolist (file (directory-files (car comm
> and-line-args-left))) (if (and (string-match emacs-lisp-file-regexp file) (not (
> auto-save-file-name-p file)) (setq source (expand-file-name file (car command-li
> ne-args-left))) (setq dest (byte-compile-dest-file source)) (file-exists-p dest)
>  (file-newer-than-file-p source dest)) (if (null (batch-byte-compile-file source
> )) (setq error t))))) (if (or (not noforce) (let* ((source (car command-line-arg
> s-left)) (dest (byte-compile-dest-file source))) (or (not (file-exists-p dest))
> (file-newer-than-file-p source dest)))) (if (null (batch-byte-compile-file (car
> command-line-args-left))) (setq error t)))) (setq command-line-args-left (cdr co
> mmand-line-args-left))) (kill-emacs (if error 1 0))))

Now I'm totally stumped: it shows contents of the symbol-function
cell, but still claims that the function is undefined??

> >> why do I have oo and oo-spd?!
> >
> > oo/ is the unoptimized build, oo-spd/ the optimized one.  Neat, ain't
> > it?
> 
> I would prefer to be able to specify this from the configure command line.

Patches for that are welcome (although I personally would not have any
use for such an option).




This bug report was last modified 12 years and 103 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.