From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 20 17:13:54 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jul 2011 21:13:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qje5W-00079e-Ac for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:13:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qje5R-00079M-2e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:13:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qje5I-0006EK-0E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:13:39 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:55123) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qje5H-0006E6-Ar for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:13:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42650) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qje5D-0005UY-31 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:13:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qje58-0006B4-Ef for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:13:30 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.216.169]:40805) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qje4u-00060b-In; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:13:13 -0400 Received: by qyk32 with SMTP id 32so3628772qyk.0 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:13:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:subject:user-agent:mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to :reply-to:x-attribution:x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=5eTHqhU7Vn7RUcUe4qYqaCsAYVO+zJax3stucgYx3ek=; b=AJpLcforgrnaEaM9XuX5gDOgH3kzJuxy7fH7zm4BTEPQd66ixBWfVKM6yjJFWIvFv4 DZT0JkmEDH321VAB0QnXIHLkV3u8rG3G5xRC4O60JlyMmzKE2mRaHk19ECuJmsvJcqOB B3OB+j/FXfPxQVN6t2T80xSXe50XXzUYNBpDM= Received: by 10.224.213.136 with SMTP id gw8mr546903qab.8.1311196390685; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:13:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smsv2-L.wtc.algo ([216.55.52.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m7sm389790qct.41.2011.07.20.14.13.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:13:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Sam Steingold To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:13:08 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: sds@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) $ bzr pull $ cd nt $ ./configure.bat --no-debug --with-gcc --cflags -IC:/gnu/gnuwin32/include --ldflags -LC:/gnu/gnuwin32/lib --without-xpm $ c:/gnu/gnuwin32/bin/make bootstrap ....... make[2]: Leaving directory `C:/sds/src/emacs/trunk/lisp' C:/gnu/gnuwin32/bin/make -w -C ../leim all [Please ignore a syntax error on the next line - it is intentional] /usr/bin/sh: -c: line 0: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `"' /usr/bin/sh: -c: line 1: syntax error: unexpected end of file make[2]: Entering directory `C:/sds/src/emacs/trunk/leim' "./../src/oo-spd/i386/emacs.exe" -batch --no-site-file --no-site-lisp -f batch-byte-compile quail/latin-ltx.el Symbol's function definition is void: batch-byte-compile make[2]: *** [quail/latin-ltx.elc] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `C:/sds/src/emacs/trunk/leim' make[1]: *** [all-other-dirs-gmake] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `C:/sds/src/emacs/trunk/nt' make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2 -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://pmw.org.il http://mideasttruth.com http://camera.org http://honestreporting.com http://ffii.org http://www.memritv.org MS: Brain off-line, please wait. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 20 17:18:32 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jul 2011 21:18:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjeA0-0007Gg-0T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:18:32 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qje9u-0007GO-Ab for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:18:26 -0400 Received: by qwc23 with SMTP id 23so340035qwc.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:18:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=Z/0KWdQ9roPMgMgj08hxyiBhiGPA8uzEUAkBAa5agC0=; b=TgdnNgs4VRG/sFioNAyDBEjv2nR2m9GyrtZGRaVJXfouNImL3MD8KVZe7EYim6qUJq ItFOOhcG/MVcXPounS74ElvScXcovxN20x087A2TIhqaTYzPV7kCTV+0t1IXEuon7rLV u6QJlF980fxA/QVHxD5BioHtr+XCWM4Cp4Dh4= Received: by 10.224.206.71 with SMTP id ft7mr7926320qab.281.1311196695743; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:18:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smsv2-L.wtc.algo ([216.55.52.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p4sm393279qct.36.2011.07.20.14.18.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:18:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Sam Steingold To: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-Reply-To: (GNU bug Tracking System's message of "Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:14:02 +0000") References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:18:13 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: sds@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.5 (----) In the middle of the "make bootstrap" process I get Generating autoloads for dframe.el... Generating autoloads for dframe.el...done Making generated-autoload-file local to *autoload-file* while let-bound! Generating autoloads for dired-aux.el... Unhandled exception at 0x05a74ac3 in emacs.exe: 0xC0000096: Privileged instruction. if I refuse to debug, the next line of output is for el in C:/sds/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/emacs-lisp/byte-opt.el C:/sds/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el C:/sds/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/emacs-lisp/macroexp.el C:/sds/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/emacs-lisp/cconv.el C:/sds/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/subr.el C:/sds/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/progmodes/cc-mode.el C:/sds/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/progmodes/cc-vars.el; do \ -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://camera.org http://www.memritv.org http://pmw.org.il http://mideasttruth.com http://dhimmi.com The plural of "anecdote" is not "data". From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 20 17:31:25 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jul 2011 21:31:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjeMX-0007YZ-3y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:31:25 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com ([74.125.83.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjeMU-0007YM-WC for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:31:23 -0400 Received: by pvh18 with SMTP id 18so568584pvh.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:31:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SXAa1ECDoEolJhhypyZEgu/TK6oM594W2B266iTnea8=; b=Ny7snBmJL08B+8d9mpxooJ+EQN997C4nqtmdm6Y89smHXQu8HCnT5Z1Gip0CNRFjPX z7DPZ1NGfS4i8J3asSGqp4fhmDSdRQ18kPXUOP22vK2qaZeZl5gNOJ4MmsKQwYZBxF7W F7kWIBgSuVtm0l7TZ1k2fj9hNqVq6opJyrO9o= Received: by 10.142.122.26 with SMTP id u26mr4264111wfc.353.1311197477077; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:31:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.12.14 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:30:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:30:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows To: sds@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 23:18, Sam Steingold wrote: > Generating autoloads for dired-aux.el... > Unhandled exception at 0x05a74ac3 in emacs.exe: 0xC0000096: Privileged in= struction. Which compiler are you using? =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 20 18:27:58 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jul 2011 22:27:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjfFA-0001EV-VJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:27:57 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjfF4-0001EE-4o for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:27:51 -0400 Received: by qwc23 with SMTP id 23so365072qwc.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:27:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=EM+yeGRu+5JFk/65w5RGrEGywbxK40nihfQ5P87gbE4=; b=XWzuJmzBNXMs6LXledFUvDXM8JYoeBdS0SvOIvquvQCEOpSgwRXh0FY0loKhbmigIb SJMTWBm8O0JeAVPVPtrUfL4cLT8JE5ooBEGhDNKRmO2oZ4pkS1Xp2Ry9HyC4RT/r98Ng RB/6NnM/fIdWhWdjZGRr5mXE2bOkMUiYKuT/Y= Received: by 10.229.229.195 with SMTP id jj3mr7275889qcb.232.1311200859745; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:27:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smsv2-L.wtc.algo ([216.55.52.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q12sm433909qca.33.2011.07.20.15.27.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:27:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Sam Steingold To: Juanma Barranquero Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:30:37 +0200") References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:27:37 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: sds@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) > * Juanma Barranquero [2011-07-20 23:30:37 +0200]: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 23:18, Sam Steingold wrote: >> Generating autoloads for dired-aux.el... >> Unhandled exception at 0x05a74ac3 in emacs.exe: 0xC0000096: Privileged instruction. > > Which compiler are you using? gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special, gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125) GNU Make 3.81 windows xp 2003 sp 2 intel core i7 cpu -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tap12009/ http://openvotingconsortium.org http://ffii.org http://truepeace.org http://dhimmi.com http://www.memritv.org Any supplier that makes enough to pay a full time lobbyist is overcharging. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 20 18:31:09 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jul 2011 22:31:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjfIL-0001Jk-0O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:31:09 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com ([74.125.83.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjfIJ-0001JH-1y for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:31:07 -0400 Received: by pvh18 with SMTP id 18so605780pvh.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:31:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ymzctniWfeHaFPAEXuU2JKpPbWFOswtelp1E+ECbsXg=; b=QTK1BfenfvyrXv0Q0fdAeEqHKia23y18z+VMZB3yd6Yu1iT8by17tQQ5t6Jb5Slpw3 KFKtbA31Dh4SD4MaCVZk4MV7YpmgsVzxuaRaOrMQNfWM3FFW4TA6ofiagkziTHrBjOtm YrCIP5qkppF58mhjVj2gxDF0Xie33BSC8Ofjo= Received: by 10.143.2.12 with SMTP id e12mr4029936wfi.296.1311201061159; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:31:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.12.14 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:30:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:30:21 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows To: sds@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 00:27, Sam Steingold wrote: > gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special, gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125) Is that a Cygwin GCC? But you're building a non-cygwin Emacs, are you? =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 20 18:34:46 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jul 2011 22:34:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjfLl-0001ON-It for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:34:46 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com ([209.85.216.179]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjfLg-0001O7-2o for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:34:41 -0400 Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29so424921qyk.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:34:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=kVt4FGGVRtewso78/umXPn/Yd+OcZtqtFLahHdp//OY=; b=bZfaoPFhKxdFnAS2l/mOpLQEpdMKHCSwLNPqiWp0TPo7kic3TXrxSPXCGcklAwAIxA QkgH3FstfnmY594OggswO33ydKOdqn7XF3u47m9kZddYW2PeGeg486VOpuaYrxlO9l9L aHDCm+wqD+cuS34Q0+TG1D3sOTfskmD/GqAOY= Received: by 10.224.213.74 with SMTP id gv10mr1251027qab.371.1311201270530; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:34:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smsv2-L.wtc.algo ([216.55.52.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r12sm439117qct.22.2011.07.20.15.34.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:34:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Sam Steingold To: Juanma Barranquero Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:30:21 +0200") References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:34:28 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: sds@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) > * Juanma Barranquero [2011-07-21 00:30:21 +0200]: > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 00:27, Sam Steingold wrote: > >> gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special, gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125) > > Is that a Cygwin GCC? yes, it is being called with -mno-cygwin > But you're building a non-cygwin Emacs, are you? yes -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://honestreporting.com http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tap12009/ http://dhimmi.com http://openvotingconsortium.org http://ffii.org What's the difference between Apathy & Ignorance? -I don't know and don't care! From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 20 19:11:04 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jul 2011 23:11:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjfuy-0002D0-3S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:11:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f53.google.com ([209.85.210.53]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjfuw-0002CV-3d for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:11:02 -0400 Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6so1002247pzk.12 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:10:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Puvoh904bSBOVG/8o87mInlTYK6YW0cxw1CE4eQjQdk=; b=EX9FGcdzWrRbOfM++kzsiRSk1a6o+oC3TsUMrZDQwhAVIa8RcTWx12m+lD7pXg90kE SbRvitk2LXZc9rEfvS/X45N0Lk0VO9FCyM31YZ+lEv/6Lqf8wQHcRgjd2UdqYQHd54Hs pv+zQu3eevaOWqHPjoqD1HuNaFAKgsOJF0XK4= Received: by 10.142.245.21 with SMTP id s21mr4179771wfh.11.1311203456110; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:10:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.12.14 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:10:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 01:10:16 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows To: sds@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 00:34, Sam Steingold wrote: > yes, it is being called with -mno-cygwin Could you try with a mingw toolset, preferably with an older compiler like GCC 3.4.5? =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 00:12:13 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 04:12:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjkcL-00022U-Tm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:12:13 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.160.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjkcH-00021y-7M for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:12:09 -0400 Received: by gyd5 with SMTP id 5so423642gyd.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:11:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gGq+apWuWlVMDa26EmIrhvwLZLRGy1Tma3LyJ1xjQxc=; b=OTl4HSHTiuk1KImZcejWOYZLlZktbrFZc7bH97/WOyL8xYNKDhY31oJKzfiIVxNfmS AT7otgcix4jYFKzbjS0hkGmkS1Sh7F0ia2005XPOiMKOr52SQEgtun4ZQpvLgCEgG/VT CjyWMnYMLLfr5dKRzC/4z6FYKKQYGIWjxAu/Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.243.18 with SMTP id q18mr115254ybh.171.1311221519599; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:11:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.244.195 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:11:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:11:59 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3snIpQOvPUZhHC_Ea_JkqQhasx4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows From: Sam Steingold To: Juanma Barranquero Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 00:34, Sam Steingold wrote: >> yes, it is being called with -mno-cygwin > > Could you try with a mingw toolset, preferably with an older compiler > like GCC 3.4.5? I have never been able to get msys/mingw working, sorry. -- Sam Steingold From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 04:36:56 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 08:36:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjokZ-0000Xt-Ox for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 04:36:56 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjokY-0000Xi-4o for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 04:36:54 -0400 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QjokS-0008Mg-8m; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 04:36:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 04:36:48 -0400 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: sds@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Sam Steingold on Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:13:08 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows References: X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) > From: Sam Steingold > Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:13:08 -0400 > Reply-To: sds@gnu.org > > $ bzr pull > $ cd nt > $ ./configure.bat --no-debug --with-gcc --cflags -IC:/gnu/gnuwin32/include --ldflags -LC:/gnu/gnuwin32/lib --without-xpm > $ c:/gnu/gnuwin32/bin/make bootstrap > ....... > make[2]: Leaving directory `C:/sds/src/emacs/trunk/lisp' > C:/gnu/gnuwin32/bin/make -w -C ../leim all > [Please ignore a syntax error on the next line - it is intentional] > /usr/bin/sh: -c: line 0: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `"' > /usr/bin/sh: -c: line 1: syntax error: unexpected end of file > make[2]: Entering directory `C:/sds/src/emacs/trunk/leim' > "./../src/oo-spd/i386/emacs.exe" -batch --no-site-file --no-site-lisp -f batch-byte-compile quail/latin-ltx.el > Symbol's function definition is void: batch-byte-compile Is this a new thing? When was the last time you succeeded to bootstrap on Windows, and did something change in your system configuration since then? A new port of Bash, perhaps, or of Make, or of GCC? Anyway, leim/makefile.w32-in has this part: buildlisppath=$(CURDIR)/$(dot)$(dot)/lisp ... # Set EMACSLOADPATH correctly (already defined in environment). EMACSLOADPATH=$(buildlisppath) Could you check if this somehow doesn't get defined correctly or doesn't take effect? E.g., perhaps $(CURDIR) evaluates to something that's unpalatable to the native Windows build of Emacs? Or maybe you need to export it? Also, if you type the failing command manually, does it succeed or does it fail in the same way? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 04:39:00 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 08:39:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjoma-0000cg-5q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 04:39:00 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjomY-0000cV-04 for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 04:38:58 -0400 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QjomS-0000MR-Oa; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 04:38:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 04:38:52 -0400 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: sds@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Sam Steingold on Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:18:13 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows References: X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) > From: Sam Steingold > Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:18:13 -0400 > > In the middle of the "make bootstrap" process I get > > Generating autoloads for dframe.el... > Generating autoloads for dframe.el...done > Making generated-autoload-file local to *autoload-file* while let-bound! > Generating autoloads for dired-aux.el... > Unhandled exception at 0x05a74ac3 in emacs.exe: 0xC0000096: Privileged instruction. Can you install DrMinGW, or run this command under GDB, and show the traceback? Again, when was the last time this worked for you? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 10:46:47 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 14:46:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjuWQ-0001G8-7k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:46:47 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com ([209.85.216.179]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjuWI-0001Fr-Ta for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:46:40 -0400 Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29so776729qyk.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:46:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=I1q/zatxusjr1XnMYeIePn68DN+ywBbKsk7yOtvthKc=; b=HvuIv0Pfs0WCx6cSKwarHiK9xS0vZGBPw4a0fyBNXX2Q8xhfLTIoMYllJ4w4CrYoXJ 6KIPEKoCkcBBzLGfJaNaA6KCohYqHEtoOXPsIiGgyYAOg8WvW19U5G8w35g1mGWb4+OJ 8Z6LGOYYpvFtCe5gWqxFzs/31UsuSkDnlBE+Q= Received: by 10.229.114.194 with SMTP id f2mr306333qcq.112.1311259587843; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:46:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smsv2-L.wtc.algo ([216.55.52.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w12sm194868qct.24.2011.07.21.07.46.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:46:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Sam Steingold To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 21 Jul 2011 04:38:52 -0400") References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:46:24 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: sds@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-21 04:38:52 -0400]: > >> From: Sam Steingold >> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:18:13 -0400 >> >> In the middle of the "make bootstrap" process I get >> >> Generating autoloads for dframe.el... >> Generating autoloads for dframe.el...done >> Making generated-autoload-file local to *autoload-file* while let-bound! >> Generating autoloads for dired-aux.el... >> Unhandled exception at 0x05a74ac3 in emacs.exe: 0xC0000096: Privileged instruction. > > Can you install DrMinGW, or run this command under GDB, and show the > traceback? --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline; filename=emacs-stack.txt Content-Description: traceback emacs.exe caused a Privileged Instruction at location 05a74ac3. Registers: eax=05aba00c ebx=059b4f20 ecx=059b4f50 edx=0001811e esi=059b4f21 edi=059b4f50 eip=05a74ac3 esp=0082ae6c ebp=0082aee8 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz ac pe nc cs=0023 ss=002b ds=002b es=002b fs=0053 gs=002b efl=00010212 Call stack: 05A74AC3 01034D12 emacs.exe:01034D12 secure_hash fns.c:4790 01010CCE emacs.exe:01010CCE eval_sub eval.c:2371 01010B94 emacs.exe:01010B94 eval_sub eval.c:2342 0101249F emacs.exe:0101249F Fand eval.c:282 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 010124F0 emacs.exe:010124F0 For eval.c:258 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101249F emacs.exe:0101249F Fand eval.c:282 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101242A emacs.exe:0101242A Fif eval.c:306 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01013053 emacs.exe:01013053 Flet eval.c:1095 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01012405 emacs.exe:01012405 Fcond eval.c:343 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01013053 emacs.exe:01013053 Flet eval.c:1095 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01012B48 emacs.exe:01012B48 Fwhile eval.c:1117 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01046D39 emacs.exe:01046D39 Fsave_current_buffer editfns.c:990 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 01010B45 emacs.exe:01010B45 eval_sub eval.c:2418 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 010131CD emacs.exe:010131CD FletX eval.c:1026 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 0100EC18 emacs.exe:0100EC18 internal_catch eval.c:1247 01010F7D emacs.exe:01010F7D Fcatch eval.c:1219 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101114E emacs.exe:0101114E Fprogn eval.c:358 010114A4 emacs.exe:010114A4 funcall_lambda eval.c:3233 010122D0 emacs.exe:010122D0 apply_lambda eval.c:3117 01010A40 emacs.exe:01010A40 eval_sub eval.c:2421 010124F0 emacs.exe:010124F0 For eval.c:258 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 01012F22 emacs.exe:01012F22 Flet eval.c:1065 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01012468 emacs.exe:01012468 Fif eval.c:309 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 01010B45 emacs.exe:01010B45 eval_sub eval.c:2418 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01012405 emacs.exe:01012405 Fcond eval.c:343 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101114E emacs.exe:0101114E Fprogn eval.c:358 01012B48 emacs.exe:01012B48 Fwhile eval.c:1117 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 0104B3D5 emacs.exe:0104B3D5 Fsave_restriction editfns.c:3351 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01046CF1 emacs.exe:01046CF1 Fsave_excursion editfns.c:975 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101114E emacs.exe:0101114E Fprogn eval.c:358 01012468 emacs.exe:01012468 Fif eval.c:309 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 01010B45 emacs.exe:01010B45 eval_sub eval.c:2418 0101114E emacs.exe:0101114E Fprogn eval.c:358 01046D39 emacs.exe:01046D39 Fsave_current_buffer editfns.c:990 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 01010B45 emacs.exe:01010B45 eval_sub eval.c:2418 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01013053 emacs.exe:01013053 Flet eval.c:1095 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 0100EC18 emacs.exe:0100EC18 internal_catch eval.c:1247 01010F7D emacs.exe:01010F7D Fcatch eval.c:1219 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101114E emacs.exe:0101114E Fprogn eval.c:358 010114A4 emacs.exe:010114A4 funcall_lambda eval.c:3233 010122D0 emacs.exe:010122D0 apply_lambda eval.c:3117 01010A40 emacs.exe:01010A40 eval_sub eval.c:2421 010123D2 emacs.exe:010123D2 Fcond eval.c:332 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101114E emacs.exe:0101114E Fprogn eval.c:358 01012B48 emacs.exe:01012B48 Fwhile eval.c:1117 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01013053 emacs.exe:01013053 Flet eval.c:1095 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 0100EC18 emacs.exe:0100EC18 internal_catch eval.c:1247 01010F7D emacs.exe:01010F7D Fcatch eval.c:1219 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 01010B94 emacs.exe:01010B94 eval_sub eval.c:2342 01010B45 emacs.exe:01010B45 eval_sub eval.c:2418 01010B45 emacs.exe:01010B45 eval_sub eval.c:2418 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01046D39 emacs.exe:01046D39 Fsave_current_buffer editfns.c:990 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 01010B45 emacs.exe:01010B45 eval_sub eval.c:2418 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 010131CD emacs.exe:010131CD FletX eval.c:1026 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 010114A4 emacs.exe:010114A4 funcall_lambda eval.c:3233 0101174B emacs.exe:0101174B Ffuncall eval.c:3081 01011FC7 emacs.exe:01011FC7 Fapply eval.c:2516 01010E3A emacs.exe:01010E3A eval_sub eval.c:2329 0101114E emacs.exe:0101114E Fprogn eval.c:358 01013053 emacs.exe:01013053 Flet eval.c:1095 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 010114A4 emacs.exe:010114A4 funcall_lambda eval.c:3233 010122D0 emacs.exe:010122D0 apply_lambda eval.c:3117 01010A40 emacs.exe:01010A40 eval_sub eval.c:2421 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01013053 emacs.exe:01013053 Flet eval.c:1095 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101114E emacs.exe:0101114E Fprogn eval.c:358 010114A4 emacs.exe:010114A4 funcall_lambda eval.c:3233 0101174B emacs.exe:0101174B Ffuncall eval.c:3081 01010E3A emacs.exe:01010E3A eval_sub eval.c:2329 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01012468 emacs.exe:01012468 Fif eval.c:309 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01012405 emacs.exe:01012405 Fcond eval.c:343 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 010131CD emacs.exe:010131CD FletX eval.c:1026 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01012B48 emacs.exe:01012B48 Fwhile eval.c:1117 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01013053 emacs.exe:01013053 Flet eval.c:1095 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101244A emacs.exe:0101244A Fif eval.c:309 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 01010B45 emacs.exe:01010B45 eval_sub eval.c:2418 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01013053 emacs.exe:01013053 Flet eval.c:1095 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 010114A4 emacs.exe:010114A4 funcall_lambda eval.c:3233 010122D0 emacs.exe:010122D0 apply_lambda eval.c:3117 01010A40 emacs.exe:01010A40 eval_sub eval.c:2421 0101114E emacs.exe:0101114E Fprogn eval.c:358 010114A4 emacs.exe:010114A4 funcall_lambda eval.c:3233 010122D0 emacs.exe:010122D0 apply_lambda eval.c:3117 01010A40 emacs.exe:01010A40 eval_sub eval.c:2421 01010F2D emacs.exe:01010F2D Funwind_protect eval.c:1347 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01013053 emacs.exe:01013053 Flet eval.c:1095 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 01012468 emacs.exe:01012468 Fif eval.c:309 01010EC9 emacs.exe:01010EC9 eval_sub eval.c:2305 0101112F emacs.exe:0101112F Fprogn eval.c:358 010114A4 emacs.exe:010114A4 funcall_lambda eval.c:3233 010122D0 emacs.exe:010122D0 apply_lambda eval.c:3117 01010A40 emacs.exe:01010A40 eval_sub eval.c:2421 01012BFA emacs.exe:01012BFA Feval eval.c:2211 0101CC55 emacs.exe:0101CC55 top_level_2 keyboard.c:1166 0100ECE3 emacs.exe:0100ECE3 internal_condition_case eval.c:1494 0101CC87 emacs.exe:0101CC87 top_level_1 keyboard.c:1178 0100EC18 emacs.exe:0100EC18 internal_catch eval.c:1247 0101CAC4 emacs.exe:0101CAC4 recursive_edit_1 keyboard.c:1135 0101CBF6 emacs.exe:0101CBF6 Frecursive_edit keyboard.c:821 01002EFE emacs.exe:01002EFE main emacs.c:1704 010010BB emacs.exe:010010BB __mingw_CRTStartup crt1.c:244 010012A8 emacs.exe:010012A8 7D4E7D42 kernel32.dll:7D4E7D42 BaseProcessInitPostImport --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain > Again, when was the last time this worked for you? don't remember, sorry. -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://palestinefacts.org http://www.memritv.org http://dhimmi.com http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tap12009/ http://pmw.org.il What was the best thing before sliced bread? --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 10:54:19 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 14:54:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjudh-0001QQ-Lj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:54:18 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjuda-0001Pw-SN for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:54:12 -0400 Received: by qwc23 with SMTP id 23so676940qwc.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:54:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=ryyybnuBLDdGVewkPKfrHMKUZqMRCgfSJuyi/mgFAB4=; b=s5t5rMpJPRtBN3BsgCRDhpiEuRBDrIjahwPtgO8WQ41y1kzMSEUud5bZwwcVa4xQ6a YaEL2/69F6+11dNjgRdPS8vlglLkTpMvKrKbHJQG4+MScb0oz+yv9viQ4AarEh7fBP4l jjOGoWAjesOHw95KplLQCCIDxNCqu9CuXQ0Ik= Received: by 10.229.236.10 with SMTP id ki10mr274663qcb.274.1311260041450; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:54:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smsv2-L.wtc.algo ([216.55.52.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u12sm892499qct.3.2011.07.21.07.53.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:53:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Sam Steingold To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 21 Jul 2011 04:36:48 -0400") References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:53:57 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: sds@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-21 04:36:48 -0400]: > > Is this a new thing? When was the last time you succeeded to > bootstrap on Windows, and did something change in your system > configuration since then? A new port of Bash, perhaps, or of Make, or > of GCC? the last time I tried (and failed) was in April (or May?). I don't remember the symptoms. > Also, if you type the failing command manually, does it succeed or > does it fail in the same way? the exact same error, even if I load bytecomp.el explicitly with -l -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://truepeace.org http://www.memritv.org http://mideasttruth.com http://pmw.org.il http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tap12009/ http://jihadwatch.org Please wait, MS Windows are preparing the blue screen of death. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 12:33:00 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 16:33:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjwBD-0003eS-1R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:33:00 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjwB6-0003eC-VW for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:32:53 -0400 Received: by qwc23 with SMTP id 23so729897qwc.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:32:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=G278tgME3SP/Ewprl0BSJ726TM2AnVGUXuP11ZQE7OY=; b=s2jpUay8+UEYGLgevBSPhBmpyNZFlte7lsc2lssBn9jlkW5m+7kIeVfiDFBVPXUPi8 2b5Jg9HM0+FZp5zGy+2fOJzB5Qb22MyWFrFSRS0cjBoz4VmXtsojSfnziZ0JzZtLGqd5 CSp1l/95vU1OGEydrYZD8FDIyEBOAgUTbkAKQ= Received: by 10.224.194.70 with SMTP id dx6mr376608qab.309.1311265963449; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smsv2-L.wtc.algo ([216.55.52.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w12sm258013qct.12.2011.07.21.09.32.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:32:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Sam Steingold To: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-Reply-To: (Sam Steingold's message of "Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:18:13 -0400") References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:32:40 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: sds@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) > * Sam Steingold [2011-07-20 17:18:13 -0400]: > > In the middle of the "make bootstrap" process I get > > Generating autoloads for dframe.el... > Generating autoloads for dframe.el...done > Making generated-autoload-file local to *autoload-file* while let-bound! > Generating autoloads for dired-aux.el... > Unhandled exception at 0x05a74ac3 in emacs.exe: 0xC0000096: Privileged instruction. with an older emacs executable I get much farther: $ gmake EMACS=../bin1/emacs-2011-04-27.exe bzr-update ... Generating autoloads for calc/calc-aent.el... Failure in loading charset map: GB2312 make: *** [autoloads] Error 127 -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tap12009/ http://openvotingconsortium.org http://pmw.org.il http://palestinefacts.org http://memri.org http://camera.org Microsoft wants to monopolize the right to be a monopoly. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 13:13:21 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 17:13:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjwoK-0004aL-PG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:13:20 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjwoI-0004a5-Jr for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:13:19 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LOP0020013Q5V00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:12:58 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.133.66]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LOP000SY15KF8R0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:12:57 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:13:00 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: sds@gnu.org Message-id: <83fwlzv9pf.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > From: Sam Steingold > Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:46:24 -0400 > > >> Unhandled exception at 0x05a74ac3 in emacs.exe: 0xC0000096: Privileged instruction. > > > > Can you install DrMinGW, or run this command under GDB, and show the > > traceback? > > emacs.exe caused a Privileged Instruction at location 05a74ac3. > > Registers: > eax=05aba00c ebx=059b4f20 ecx=059b4f50 edx=0001811e esi=059b4f21 edi=059b4f50 > eip=05a74ac3 esp=0082ae6c ebp=0082aee8 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz ac pe nc > cs=0023 ss=002b ds=002b es=002b fs=0053 gs=002b efl=00010212 > > Call stack: > 05A74AC3 > 01034D12 emacs.exe:01034D12 secure_hash fns.c:4790 Line 4790 of fns.c from today's bzr is an empty line. What do you see on that line? Since you compiled without debug info, I don't really trust this backtrace. Can you try building without optimizations? You will need to re-run configure.bat with the "--no-opt" switch. While at that, add the "--enable-checking" switch as well, perhaps it will be able to catch the problem earlier. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 13:17:59 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 17:17:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjwsp-0004hH-0Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:17:59 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjwsn-0004h5-9N for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:17:58 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LOP006001D5T900@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:17:49 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.133.66]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LOP0065V1DO23D0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:17:49 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:17:52 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: sds@gnu.org Message-id: <83ei1jv9hb.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > From: Sam Steingold > Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:53:57 -0400 > > > Also, if you type the failing command manually, does it succeed or > > does it fail in the same way? > > the exact same error, even if I load bytecomp.el explicitly with -l And bytecomp.el was given with leading directories or just literally as "bytecomp.el"? What happens if you invoke Emacs interactively from the src/oo-spd/i386 directory, then visit latin-ltx.el, and type "M-x emacs-lisp-byte-compile RET", with or without loading bytecomp.el? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 13:26:13 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 17:26:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjx0n-0004sR-6j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:26:13 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjx0k-0004sE-KG for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:26:11 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LOP002001LV8D00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:25:01 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.133.66]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LOP000Q81POCVV0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:25:01 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:25:04 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: sds@gnu.org Message-id: <83bownv95b.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > From: Sam Steingold > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:32:40 -0400 > > $ gmake EMACS=../bin1/emacs-2011-04-27.exe bzr-update > ... > Generating autoloads for calc/calc-aent.el... > Failure in loading charset map: GB2312 This comes from charset.c, FWIW, and the reason is a failed call to `fopen'. It would be good to know the errno value for that failure, and also the value of Vcharset_map_path. Could it be that your system runs out of available file handles? I didn't see such problems since the old DOS days, but what else can explain this? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 13:34:55 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 17:34:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjx9C-00055F-UB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:34:55 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjx9B-000553-2q for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:34:53 -0400 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1481236ewy.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:34:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lswmbTt9sMBYyLnRHkxpgOk/NHRLbMgaISFbf6AHCBg=; b=PCE2qTOL1625ZJJKUXXERvweMQ2KoRUJM1WsMihsRkGfKkmLuM9rAh8KMcS8bm9X5j we7/YspsVUeMnweRHx43FCWczs4V8Zclxz/B42xX0GqycmwyAYUi54HzhmPjBL+L7aMh Do3FofahlgW2TReWGQXXsnoe+s1vxWIual9l0= Received: by 10.213.107.15 with SMTP id z15mr381950ebo.114.1311269687162; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:34:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.114.16 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:34:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83bownv95b.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83bownv95b.fsf@gnu.org> From: Lennart Borgman Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:34:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: sds@gnu.org, 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 19:25, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Sam Steingold >> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:32:40 -0400 >> >> $ gmake EMACS=3D../bin1/emacs-2011-04-27.exe bzr-update >> ... >> Generating autoloads for calc/calc-aent.el... >> Failure in loading charset map: GB2312 > > This comes from charset.c, FWIW, and the reason is a failed call to > `fopen'. =C2=A0It would be good to know the errno value for that failure, > and also the value of Vcharset_map_path. > > Could it be that your system runs out of available file handles? =C2=A0I > didn't see such problems since the old DOS days, but what else can > explain this? How does it come that Emacs does not report the errno number here? Or is it just not seen? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 14:08:30 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 18:08:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjxfi-0005qH-Js for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:08:30 -0400 Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjxfg-0005q4-Rt for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:08:29 -0400 Received: by vxi40 with SMTP id 40so1092593vxi.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:08:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=vLxipbKFaA4P9hliT9QybsLJjitDq5rRY9lExFXKq24=; b=P5wth/qeyk47918TB0RqKzmlsF8G59lp7gXGcWJsWONXlVk2eyMGhSBXld0bxOs7kL BIGhPTX0m3JZ2aDPE7qYSY88lz065KWaPavHjzH7dU/so7GpO560RJHM5+rsb7lsigKS NUluEVt99XRuSdPDm54AZZlUwjVLCr1y4y5SQ= Received: by 10.52.97.8 with SMTP id dw8mr666506vdb.150.1311271703276; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smsv2-L.wtc.algo (rrcs-24-103-48-205.nyc.biz.rr.com [24.103.48.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gi16sm534012vcb.25.2011.07.21.11.08.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:08:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Sam Steingold To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-Reply-To: <83ei1jv9hb.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:17:52 +0300") References: <83ei1jv9hb.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:08:21 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: sds@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-21 20:17:52 +0300]: > >> From: Sam Steingold >> Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:53:57 -0400 >> >> > Also, if you type the failing command manually, does it succeed or >> > does it fail in the same way? >> >> the exact same error, even if I load bytecomp.el explicitly with -l > > And bytecomp.el was given with leading directories or just literally > as "bytecomp.el"? full correct path. > What happens if you invoke Emacs interactively from the > src/oo-spd/i386 directory, then visit latin-ltx.el, and type > "M-x emacs-lisp-byte-compile RET", with or without loading > bytecomp.el? works -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://jihadwatch.org http://www.memritv.org http://openvotingconsortium.org http://ffii.org http://palestinefacts.org http://memri.org http://camera.org My name is Deja Vu. Have we met before? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 14:09:02 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 18:09:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjxgD-0005r3-Su for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:09:02 -0400 Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjxg6-0005q4-Rw for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:09:00 -0400 Received: by mail-vx0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 40so1092593vxi.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:08:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=+7yQcUcpfkWO+kLybs0wf732f8NOEBMMf3sjw1cpoCI=; b=JuF4jgmN2zrL6vVhdiZm1DmQ0YcR/6EByBDpZEG2fyXYhzQFSpjQZZppIESXnX5gDi mZ/2bdH8/kuVyKLoUjUxmrbcPotwkjJHpDBtE0okauP0QP1LMW/Mx40/Ce1B8LK7IH3U midGuVZumN1MWPoViiK0ga688PwKuDieEP34E= Received: by 10.52.32.105 with SMTP id h9mr587297vdi.466.1311271734686; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:08:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smsv2-L.wtc.algo (rrcs-24-103-48-205.nyc.biz.rr.com [24.103.48.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r1sm778378vdw.36.2011.07.21.11.08.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:08:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Sam Steingold To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-Reply-To: <83bownv95b.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:25:04 +0300") References: <83bownv95b.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:08:51 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: sds@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-21 20:25:04 +0300]: > > This comes from charset.c, FWIW, and the reason is a failed call to > `fopen'. It would be good to know the errno value for that failure, > and also the value of Vcharset_map_path. so why doesn't emacs print a useful error message? -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://pmw.org.il http://jihadwatch.org http://memri.org http://ffii.org http://truepeace.org http://dhimmi.com http://mideasttruth.com Are you smart enough to use Lisp? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 14:30:30 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 18:30:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjy0z-0006Ky-58 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:30:29 -0400 Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjy0u-0006Kl-OC for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:30:27 -0400 Received: by vxi40 with SMTP id 40so1105901vxi.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:30:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=EN0bHsSoiu2XaZiKFfkaDLpdYRtKMWk+Nne3rMNYDmE=; b=kUKASIbog7WFNg202IWrPcpIXcmv4XamIG3bXdXqVoYDjgNZ38a6VtK9bxSppzdTGH zl1ixngvybf1kQ1wJpPLQiCd88J4WpMDNTF8RlX8iv5JN9FwXcVzrrFP2v3lInc2Z02o cPCM19efh4CvfG/ObsDwOSXLpLQoV7MYUwYr4= Received: by 10.52.68.175 with SMTP id x15mr661416vdt.224.1311273019090; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:30:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smsv2-L.wtc.algo (rrcs-24-103-48-205.nyc.biz.rr.com [24.103.48.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cp8sm787264vdc.42.2011.07.21.11.30.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:30:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Sam Steingold To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-Reply-To: <83fwlzv9pf.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:13:00 +0300") References: <83fwlzv9pf.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:30:15 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: sds@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-21 20:13:00 +0300]: > >> From: Sam Steingold >> Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:46:24 -0400 >> >> >> Unhandled exception at 0x05a74ac3 in emacs.exe: 0xC0000096: Privileged instruction. >> > >> > Can you install DrMinGW, or run this command under GDB, and show the >> > traceback? >> >> emacs.exe caused a Privileged Instruction at location 05a74ac3. >> >> Registers: >> eax=05aba00c ebx=059b4f20 ecx=059b4f50 edx=0001811e esi=059b4f21 edi=059b4f50 >> eip=05a74ac3 esp=0082ae6c ebp=0082aee8 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz ac pe nc >> cs=0023 ss=002b ds=002b es=002b fs=0053 gs=002b efl=00010212 >> >> Call stack: >> 05A74AC3 >> 01034D12 emacs.exe:01034D12 secure_hash fns.c:4790 > > Line 4790 of fns.c from today's bzr is an empty line. What do you see > on that line? hash_func (SSDATA (object) + start_byte, SBYTES (object) - (size_byte - end_byte), SSDATA (digest)); ========>>>>>>>>> if (NILP (binary)) { unsigned char *p = SDATA (digest); for (i = digest_size - 1; i >= 0; i--) { > Since you compiled without debug info, I don't really trust this > backtrace. Can you try building without optimizations? You will need > to re-run configure.bat with the "--no-opt" switch. While at that, > add the "--enable-checking" switch as well, perhaps it will be able to > catch the problem earlier. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline; filename=emacs-stack.txt emacs.exe caused a Breakpoint at location 7d61002d in module ntdll.dll. Registers: eax=00000006 ebx=03e45862 ecx=7d61f60d edx=00180002 esi=00000000 edi=00000000 eip=7d61002d esp=008297bc ebp=008297d8 iopl=0 nv up ei pl zr na po nc cs=0023 ss=002b ds=002b es=002b fs=0053 gs=002b efl=00000246 Call stack: 7D61002D ntdll.dll:7D61002D DbgBreakPoint 0103C605 emacs.exe:0103C605 make_uninit_multibyte_string alloc.c:2401 0103C594 emacs.exe:0103C594 make_uninit_string alloc.c:2384 0106622E emacs.exe:0106622E secure_hash fns.c:4784 010664BC emacs.exe:010664BC Fmd5 fns.c:4836 01035FCE emacs.exe:01035FCE eval_sub eval.c:2371 01035CCF emacs.exe:01035CCF eval_sub eval.c:2342 01030BC5 emacs.exe:01030BC5 Fand eval.c:281 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030B12 emacs.exe:01030B12 For eval.c:257 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030BC5 emacs.exe:01030BC5 Fand eval.c:281 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030C34 emacs.exe:01030C34 Fif eval.c:306 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01032F82 emacs.exe:01032F82 Flet eval.c:1095 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01030D55 emacs.exe:01030D55 Fcond eval.c:335 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01032F82 emacs.exe:01032F82 Flet eval.c:1095 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 0103305C emacs.exe:0103305C Fwhile eval.c:1117 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01081632 emacs.exe:01081632 Fsave_current_buffer editfns.c:989 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 010362D7 emacs.exe:010362D7 eval_sub eval.c:2418 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01032AA4 emacs.exe:01032AA4 FletX eval.c:1025 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01033450 emacs.exe:01033450 internal_catch eval.c:1247 010333BB emacs.exe:010333BB Fcatch eval.c:1219 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01038B70 emacs.exe:01038B70 funcall_lambda eval.c:3233 01038474 emacs.exe:01038474 apply_lambda eval.c:3117 01036306 emacs.exe:01036306 eval_sub eval.c:2421 01030B12 emacs.exe:01030B12 For eval.c:257 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01032D57 emacs.exe:01032D57 Flet eval.c:1065 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01030C77 emacs.exe:01030C77 Fif eval.c:308 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 010362D7 emacs.exe:010362D7 eval_sub eval.c:2418 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01030D55 emacs.exe:01030D55 Fcond eval.c:335 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 0103305C emacs.exe:0103305C Fwhile eval.c:1117 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 010885A1 emacs.exe:010885A1 Fsave_restriction editfns.c:3351 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 010815E8 emacs.exe:010815E8 Fsave_excursion editfns.c:975 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01030C77 emacs.exe:01030C77 Fif eval.c:308 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 010362D7 emacs.exe:010362D7 eval_sub eval.c:2418 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01081632 emacs.exe:01081632 Fsave_current_buffer editfns.c:989 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 010362D7 emacs.exe:010362D7 eval_sub eval.c:2418 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01032F82 emacs.exe:01032F82 Flet eval.c:1095 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01033450 emacs.exe:01033450 internal_catch eval.c:1247 010333BB emacs.exe:010333BB Fcatch eval.c:1219 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01038B70 emacs.exe:01038B70 funcall_lambda eval.c:3233 01038474 emacs.exe:01038474 apply_lambda eval.c:3117 01036306 emacs.exe:01036306 eval_sub eval.c:2421 01030CBD emacs.exe:01030CBD Fcond eval.c:331 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 0103305C emacs.exe:0103305C Fwhile eval.c:1117 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01032F82 emacs.exe:01032F82 Flet eval.c:1095 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01033450 emacs.exe:01033450 internal_catch eval.c:1247 010333BB emacs.exe:010333BB Fcatch eval.c:1219 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01035CCF emacs.exe:01035CCF eval_sub eval.c:2342 010362D7 emacs.exe:010362D7 eval_sub eval.c:2418 010362D7 emacs.exe:010362D7 eval_sub eval.c:2418 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01081632 emacs.exe:01081632 Fsave_current_buffer editfns.c:989 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 010362D7 emacs.exe:010362D7 eval_sub eval.c:2418 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01032AA4 emacs.exe:01032AA4 FletX eval.c:1025 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01038B70 emacs.exe:01038B70 funcall_lambda eval.c:3233 01038213 emacs.exe:01038213 Ffuncall eval.c:3070 01036C57 emacs.exe:01036C57 Fapply eval.c:2514 01035C05 emacs.exe:01035C05 eval_sub eval.c:2329 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01032F82 emacs.exe:01032F82 Flet eval.c:1095 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01038B70 emacs.exe:01038B70 funcall_lambda eval.c:3233 01038474 emacs.exe:01038474 apply_lambda eval.c:3117 01036306 emacs.exe:01036306 eval_sub eval.c:2421 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01032F82 emacs.exe:01032F82 Flet eval.c:1095 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01038B70 emacs.exe:01038B70 funcall_lambda eval.c:3233 01038213 emacs.exe:01038213 Ffuncall eval.c:3070 01035C05 emacs.exe:01035C05 eval_sub eval.c:2329 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01030C77 emacs.exe:01030C77 Fif eval.c:308 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01030D55 emacs.exe:01030D55 Fcond eval.c:335 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01032AA4 emacs.exe:01032AA4 FletX eval.c:1025 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 0103305C emacs.exe:0103305C Fwhile eval.c:1117 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01032F82 emacs.exe:01032F82 Flet eval.c:1095 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030C57 emacs.exe:01030C57 Fif eval.c:307 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 010362D7 emacs.exe:010362D7 eval_sub eval.c:2418 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01032F82 emacs.exe:01032F82 Flet eval.c:1095 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01038B70 emacs.exe:01038B70 funcall_lambda eval.c:3233 01038474 emacs.exe:01038474 apply_lambda eval.c:3117 01036306 emacs.exe:01036306 eval_sub eval.c:2421 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01038B70 emacs.exe:01038B70 funcall_lambda eval.c:3233 01038474 emacs.exe:01038474 apply_lambda eval.c:3117 01036306 emacs.exe:01036306 eval_sub eval.c:2421 01033610 emacs.exe:01033610 Funwind_protect eval.c:1346 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01032F82 emacs.exe:01032F82 Flet eval.c:1095 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01030C77 emacs.exe:01030C77 Fif eval.c:308 0103594F emacs.exe:0103594F eval_sub eval.c:2305 01030DFD emacs.exe:01030DFD Fprogn eval.c:357 01038B70 emacs.exe:01038B70 funcall_lambda eval.c:3233 01038474 emacs.exe:01038474 apply_lambda eval.c:3117 01036306 emacs.exe:01036306 eval_sub eval.c:2421 01035495 emacs.exe:01035495 Feval eval.c:2211 0100510E emacs.exe:0100510E top_level_2 keyboard.c:1166 01033A90 emacs.exe:01033A90 internal_condition_case eval.c:1493 01005140 emacs.exe:01005140 top_level_1 keyboard.c:1173 01033450 emacs.exe:01033450 internal_catch eval.c:1247 0100507B emacs.exe:0100507B command_loop keyboard.c:1135 01004663 emacs.exe:01004663 recursive_edit_1 keyboard.c:756 01004985 emacs.exe:01004985 Frecursive_edit keyboard.c:821 01002806 emacs.exe:01002806 main emacs.c:1703 010010BB emacs.exe:010010BB __mingw_CRTStartup crt1.c:244 010012A8 emacs.exe:010012A8 0114ED3B emacs.exe:0114ED3B _start unexw32.c:131 7D4E7D42 kernel32.dll:7D4E7D42 BaseProcessInitPostImport --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://honestreporting.com http://memri.org http://openvotingconsortium.org http://www.memritv.org http://thereligionofpeace.com http://pmw.org.il ((lambda (x) (list x (list 'quote x))) '(lambda (x) (list x (list 'quote x)))) --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 15:06:29 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 19:06:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjyZo-00080j-VK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:06:29 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjyZl-00080V-Nk for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:06:26 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LOP003006BLFQ00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:05:57 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.133.66]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LOP002JZ6DWR0H0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:05:57 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:06:00 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: sds@gnu.org Message-id: <83aac7v4h3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83bownv95b.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > From: Sam Steingold > Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:08:51 -0400 > > > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-21 20:25:04 +0300]: > > > > This comes from charset.c, FWIW, and the reason is a failed call to > > `fopen'. It would be good to know the errno value for that failure, > > and also the value of Vcharset_map_path. > > so why doesn't emacs print a useful error message? You are welcome to add one, but please be aware that this message is presented to users in an interactive session, so it should be understandable by mere mortals. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 15:10:24 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 19:10:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjydb-00087o-Rz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:10:24 -0400 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjyda-00087c-J1 for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:10:23 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LOP00B006KAMH00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:10:16 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.133.66]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LOP00BGE6L3LV50@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:10:16 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:10:20 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: sds@gnu.org Message-id: <838vrrv49v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83fwlzv9pf.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > From: Sam Steingold > Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:30:15 -0400 > > 0103C605 emacs.exe:0103C605 make_uninit_multibyte_string alloc.c:2401 What does this line say in your sources? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 15:11:19 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 19:11:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjyeV-00089P-85 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:11:19 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjyeT-00089D-KZ for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:11:17 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44799) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QjyeN-0004Zn-Sj; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:11:11 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows References: <83bownv95b.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: ANDVT unclassified UOP president USCOI bomb Defcon AUTODIN X-Ran: 1/L2c>"`vtf83dC"Or|bSir-Mj0EQM[I^&B>hLRG[46.b\*ICE8[j]a<7(*4p,uc&}k?bs X-Hue: cyan X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:11:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83bownv95b.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:25:04 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: sds@gnu.org, 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Failure in loading charset map: GB2312 > > This comes from charset.c, FWIW, and the reason is a failed call to > `fopen'. It would be good to know the errno value for that failure, > and also the value of Vcharset_map_path. > > Could it be that your system runs out of available file handles? I > didn't see such problems since the old DOS days, but what else can > explain this? Just a comment that http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=6401 has the "failure loading charset map" issue too (I doubt it is directly related to this issue, I'm just mentioning it). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 15:22:26 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 19:22:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjypF-0008QO-DF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:22:25 -0400 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjypD-0008QB-96 for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:22:24 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LOP00B006Y5N800@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:21:34 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.133.66]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LOP00BDI73PLJ90@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:21:26 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:21:30 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: sds@gnu.org Message-id: <837h7bv3r9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ei1jv9hb.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > From: Sam Steingold > Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:08:21 -0400 > > > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-21 20:17:52 +0300]: > > > >> From: Sam Steingold > >> Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org > >> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:53:57 -0400 > >> > >> > Also, if you type the failing command manually, does it succeed or > >> > does it fail in the same way? > >> > >> the exact same error, even if I load bytecomp.el explicitly with -l > > > > And bytecomp.el was given with leading directories or just literally > > as "bytecomp.el"? > > full correct path. > > > What happens if you invoke Emacs interactively from the > > src/oo-spd/i386 directory, then visit latin-ltx.el, and type > > "M-x emacs-lisp-byte-compile RET", with or without loading > > bytecomp.el? > > works How about this, if typed from the command line? What does it print? "./../src/oo-spd/i386/emacs.exe" -batch -l ../lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el --eval "(princ (fboundp 'batch-byte-compile))" From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 15:42:13 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 19:42:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjz8O-0000Qm-S6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:42:13 -0400 Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjz8M-0000Qb-6y for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:42:11 -0400 Received: by vxi40 with SMTP id 40so1150274vxi.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:42:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=9C9E1KHcVAzMXOiEccS/aX6vQOBFYql588XNuMTJnw4=; b=pq+j7OWSrfaj1sepxXcAGW95GiSYD0rnBgV8kXVCcJlYY32e36Hd3pw1n1y79qpSYj TMj/O+Gen6rCRqjxTk6HwvZfgkMzzSYwz/3O34SYUi8vfDMO8i3TsbIIvrulFGsA8Paf HtP8jX5c2+kIV69AR6m/b+yz4y9/UrFq7gHv8= Received: by 10.52.176.10 with SMTP id ce10mr584927vdc.280.1311277324513; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:42:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smsv2-L.wtc.algo (rrcs-24-103-48-205.nyc.biz.rr.com [24.103.48.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x13sm558419vco.32.2011.07.21.12.42.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:42:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Sam Steingold To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-Reply-To: <837h7bv3r9.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:21:30 +0300") References: <83ei1jv9hb.fsf@gnu.org> <837h7bv3r9.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:42:00 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: sds@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-21 22:21:30 +0300]: > > "./../src/oo-spd/i386/emacs.exe" -batch -l > ../lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el --eval "(princ (fboundp > batch-byte-compile))" $ ls -l ../src/oo*/i386/emacs.exe 46112 -rwxr-xr-x 1 sds None 47218342 Jul 21 10:49 ../src/oo-spd/i386/emacs.exe* 48224 -rwxr-xr-x 1 sds None 49378461 Jul 21 14:24 ../src/oo/i386/emacs.exe* $ "./../src/oo-spd/i386/emacs.exe" -batch -l ../lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el --eval "(print (fboundp 'batch-byte-compile))" t $ "./../src/oo/i386/emacs.exe" -batch -l ../lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el --eval "(print (fboundp 'batch-byte-compile))" t why do I have oo and oo-spd?! -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://memri.org http://iris.org.il http://jihadwatch.org http://camera.org http://dhimmi.com http://palestinefacts.org http://ffii.org Save time: send elected officials to jail directly, bypassing the office. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 15:44:19 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 19:44:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjzAR-0000Tr-5W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:44:19 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.212.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjzAO-0000Te-JX for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:44:17 -0400 Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so1140323vws.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:44:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=/QawdlgBA77EcS7FsBOdJWBe4rHW5AgUymOEpMCft3c=; b=h23847fFYtpud6w2GY6Tr9hbtOYJKFuUPK9FQPplS7L6REZK6FTC0gR+AgNw47t54r 7Jh/YYiY948X1QIdeCi1B0YhiAkvDE2afymCzC9VX/4mmPurWOSicQGI6fhTFPSHUO88 HMUs9aaNUjhHjVDLWweR0humzx7ajHQ/v7tbQ= Received: by 10.220.38.130 with SMTP id b2mr185573vce.184.1311277450982; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:44:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smsv2-L.wtc.algo (rrcs-24-103-48-205.nyc.biz.rr.com [24.103.48.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ex5sm344213vcb.28.2011.07.21.12.44.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:44:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Sam Steingold To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-Reply-To: <83aac7v4h3.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:06:00 +0300") References: <83bownv95b.fsf@gnu.org> <83aac7v4h3.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:44:06 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: sds@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-21 22:06:00 +0300]: > > You are welcome to add one, everyone scratches one's own itch, sorry. > but please be aware that this message is presented to users in an > interactive session, so it should be understandable by mere mortals. I have never heard anyone claim that the strerror message should not be printed. -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tap12009/ http://mideasttruth.com http://ffii.org http://memri.org http://honestreporting.com http://palestinefacts.org will write code that writes code that writes code for food From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 15:45:22 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 19:45:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjzBS-0000Ve-FU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:45:22 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.212.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjzBR-0000VT-6b for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:45:21 -0400 Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so1140956vws.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:45:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=urt7JgOKiqKuELryE1z1jGnwSUAOJ/hNKsASZN/6RV4=; b=pkemBlxpZPq2wf5LJlG6NdeSYNuVr7MTaWxi4Al7CUz6R9CcAmiEec7IDFEelaha05 vjGaZJnGFPkPDUVKC+IKePtOhtYow+gh9ZZMk8Y7m843Y6l7+ct2oeIQqGqBnEz2LrrI wUZecNwQR3zOcjBqVzvp0iLpnFCGSQYFezGh8= Received: by 10.52.71.163 with SMTP id w3mr718334vdu.394.1311277516002; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:45:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smsv2-L.wtc.algo (rrcs-24-103-48-205.nyc.biz.rr.com [24.103.48.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ex5sm344487vcb.4.2011.07.21.12.45.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:45:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Sam Steingold To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-Reply-To: <838vrrv49v.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:10:20 +0300") References: <83fwlzv9pf.fsf@gnu.org> <838vrrv49v.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:45:10 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: sds@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-21 22:10:20 +0300]: > >> From: Sam Steingold >> Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:30:15 -0400 >> >> 0103C605 emacs.exe:0103C605 make_uninit_multibyte_string alloc.c:2401 > > What does this line say in your sources? if (nchars < 0) abort (); ======>>>>>>>>>>>> if (!nbytes) return empty_multibyte_string; -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://truepeace.org http://www.memritv.org http://mideasttruth.com http://ffii.org http://iris.org.il http://palestinefacts.org There are two kinds of egotists: 1) Those who admit it 2) The rest of us From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 22 02:00:35 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2011 06:00:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk8mp-0006lu-5J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:00:35 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk8mm-0006li-HU for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:00:33 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LOQ00D000ME6700@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:00:26 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.133.66]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LOQ00DD60OQ5S10@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:00:26 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:00:30 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: sds@gnu.org Message-id: <8362muvoqp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ei1jv9hb.fsf@gnu.org> <837h7bv3r9.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > From: Sam Steingold > Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:42:00 -0400 > > > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-21 22:21:30 +0300]: > > > > "./../src/oo-spd/i386/emacs.exe" -batch -l > > ../lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el --eval "(princ (fboundp > > batch-byte-compile))" > > $ ls -l ../src/oo*/i386/emacs.exe > 46112 -rwxr-xr-x 1 sds None 47218342 Jul 21 10:49 ../src/oo-spd/i386/emacs.exe* > 48224 -rwxr-xr-x 1 sds None 49378461 Jul 21 14:24 ../src/oo/i386/emacs.exe* > $ "./../src/oo-spd/i386/emacs.exe" -batch -l ../lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el --eval "(print (fboundp 'batch-byte-compile))" > > t > $ "./../src/oo/i386/emacs.exe" -batch -l ../lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el --eval "(print (fboundp 'batch-byte-compile))" > > t So the symbol is bound, but Emacs thinks it's not a function? What does this print? "./../src/oo/i386/emacs.exe" -batch -l ../lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el --eval "(print (symbol-function 'batch-byte-compile))" > why do I have oo and oo-spd?! oo/ is the unoptimized build, oo-spd/ the optimized one. Neat, ain't it? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 22 02:02:31 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2011 06:02:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk8oh-0006oa-DG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:02:31 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk8of-0006oO-IW for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:02:29 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LOQ00D000RD6Q00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:02:23 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.133.66]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LOQ00DTK0RY3M30@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:02:23 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:02:27 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: sds@gnu.org Message-id: <834o2evong.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83bownv95b.fsf@gnu.org> <83aac7v4h3.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > From: Sam Steingold > Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:44:06 -0400 > > > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-21 22:06:00 +0300]: > > > > You are welcome to add one, > > everyone scratches one's own itch, sorry. No need to be sorry. > I have never heard anyone claim that the strerror message should not be printed. I meant the text around what strerror returns. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 22 02:04:26 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2011 06:04:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk8qX-0006rK-KV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:04:25 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk8qV-0006r9-CD for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:04:24 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LOQ009000QXPP00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:04:17 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.133.66]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LOQ009BG0V43QB0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:04:17 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:04:21 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: sds@gnu.org Message-id: <8339hyvoka.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83fwlzv9pf.fsf@gnu.org> <838vrrv49v.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > From: Sam Steingold > Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:45:10 -0400 > > > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-21 22:10:20 +0300]: > > > >> From: Sam Steingold > >> Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org > >> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:30:15 -0400 > >> > >> 0103C605 emacs.exe:0103C605 make_uninit_multibyte_string alloc.c:2401 > > > > What does this line say in your sources? > > if (nchars < 0) > abort (); > ======>>>>>>>>>>>> if (!nbytes) > return empty_multibyte_string; I don't believe this line can crash. If you run the command that crashed by hand, does it also crash? If it does, can you run it under GDB? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 22 02:59:28 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2011 06:59:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk9hn-00084v-L0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:59:27 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com ([209.85.215.178]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk9hl-00084i-6s for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:59:25 -0400 Received: by eye4 with SMTP id 4so1941853eye.23 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:59:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NFQ6SWClbjDV0ZHm8WB3zuX8dUPSfpZb9Hbi1uRnj0U=; b=Kgax7CuzsuTAerGyKpSzR70091/e0xJgZgHGbZTUfODDanxV3bq9O6fD5wtqofIKOg 2i/+lr0bvtA1je568SVRF7L8FIDdGivZv2ewTyFx+LQipsAVp+NXNOkkZAp0v1mqAl4J YWCYmHsELcnk/YXZ7eX54AfNGesRUu3rvHuP8= Received: by 10.213.107.15 with SMTP id z15mr600405ebo.114.1311317959148; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:59:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.114.16 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:58:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8362muvoqp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ei1jv9hb.fsf@gnu.org> <837h7bv3r9.fsf@gnu.org> <8362muvoqp.fsf@gnu.org> From: Lennart Borgman Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 08:58:59 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: sds@gnu.org, 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 08:00, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > oo/ is the unoptimized build, oo-spd/ the optimized one. =C2=A0Neat, ain'= t > it? And nearly self-explaining, maybe ... ;-) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 22 10:08:24 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2011 14:08:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGOu-0001hT-8e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:08:24 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.212.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGOs-0001hF-BV for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:08:23 -0400 Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so1628556vws.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 07:08:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=fQVMEE8AJfdWitgOWnr9+CbSvf17cfWDWVfHMILjV5E=; b=ZUhzTTZo0R0l9I5QluUiDvh7wPtRRUORnWrY6JsrzJFgGyZWze/7V2cm9kMayFfM9X KVOZZBMj0fkZIcPTPwqdOFwQY4y48jFHQ4ff6Jobs8FIbL2Ykzu7bpYq+/DpBMnj2OYI gdiUZcCqCsPQibhtayrlT5QuTP49GOIpvHno8= Received: by 10.220.177.137 with SMTP id bi9mr396184vcb.216.1311343696668; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 07:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smsv2-L.wtc.algo (rrcs-24-103-48-205.nyc.biz.rr.com [24.103.48.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cj5sm852606vcb.27.2011.07.22.07.08.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 22 Jul 2011 07:08:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Sam Steingold To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-Reply-To: <8362muvoqp.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:00:30 +0300") References: <83ei1jv9hb.fsf@gnu.org> <837h7bv3r9.fsf@gnu.org> <8362muvoqp.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:08:08 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: sds@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-22 09:00:30 +0300]: > > So the symbol is bound, but Emacs thinks it's not a function? What > does this print? > > "./../src/oo/i386/emacs.exe" -batch -l ../lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el > --eval "(print (symbol-function 'batch-byte-compile))" (closure (byte-compile--for-effect print-gensym-alist byte-compile--outbuffer by te-compiler-error-flag byte-compile-free-assignments byte-compile-free-reference s t) (&optional noforce) "Run `byte-compile-file' on the files remaining on the command line. Use this from the command line, with `-batch'; it won't work in an interactive Emacs. Each file is processed even if an error occurred previously. For example, invoke \"emacs -batch -f batch-byte-compile $emacs/ ~/*.el\". If NOFORCE is non-nil, don't recompile a file that seems to be already up-to-date." (defvar command-line-args-left) (if (not noninteractive) (e rror "`batch-byte-compile' is to be used only with -batch")) (let ((error nil)) (while command-line-args-left (if (file-directory-p (expand-file-name (car comma nd-line-args-left))) (let (source dest) (dolist (file (directory-files (car comm and-line-args-left))) (if (and (string-match emacs-lisp-file-regexp file) (not ( auto-save-file-name-p file)) (setq source (expand-file-name file (car command-li ne-args-left))) (setq dest (byte-compile-dest-file source)) (file-exists-p dest) (file-newer-than-file-p source dest)) (if (null (batch-byte-compile-file source )) (setq error t))))) (if (or (not noforce) (let* ((source (car command-line-arg s-left)) (dest (byte-compile-dest-file source))) (or (not (file-exists-p dest)) (file-newer-than-file-p source dest)))) (if (null (batch-byte-compile-file (car command-line-args-left))) (setq error t)))) (setq command-line-args-left (cdr co mmand-line-args-left))) (kill-emacs (if error 1 0)))) >> why do I have oo and oo-spd?! > > oo/ is the unoptimized build, oo-spd/ the optimized one. Neat, ain't > it? I would prefer to be able to specify this from the configure command line. -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://ffii.org http://memri.org http://palestinefacts.org http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tap12009/ http://camera.org http://iris.org.il Those, who refuse to do the math, are doomed to talk nonsense. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 22 10:18:32 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2011 14:18:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGYi-0001wg-5L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:18:32 -0400 Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGYg-0001wV-4C for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:18:31 -0400 Received: by vxi40 with SMTP id 40so1639310vxi.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 07:18:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=Emw+aFkegbxY2N6BB+HvPwyhtOQiutcyz9KGKZpTuMA=; b=Zu2/Y8jxrF2eJR1250AcE1VlGeYJnSO18mzZumiAw7Gcu1N/dUanftWXOdQFSEFTiJ p207dloDjow6xmLZLoiww1TH3AqmqmjTD9hP2CRnQcGW1dLPJ/7MCEyenj2UARzrE+gE oNp9tnTwhOSFwqXPJTonJ5kNjC2S6gChTH+Mk= Received: by 10.52.88.146 with SMTP id bg18mr1578736vdb.94.1311344304556; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 07:18:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smsv2-L.wtc.algo (rrcs-24-103-48-205.nyc.biz.rr.com [24.103.48.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dk8sm855614vcb.30.2011.07.22.07.18.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 22 Jul 2011 07:18:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Sam Steingold To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-Reply-To: <834o2evong.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:02:27 +0300") References: <83bownv95b.fsf@gnu.org> <83aac7v4h3.fsf@gnu.org> <834o2evong.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:18:20 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: sds@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-22 09:02:27 +0300]: >> I have never heard anyone claim that the strerror message should not be printed. > I meant the text around what strerror returns. the problem was that strerror was not printed at all. -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://dhimmi.com http://pmw.org.il http://www.memritv.org http://ffii.org http://camera.org http://palestinefacts.org http://thereligionofpeace.com There are many reasons not to use Linux - but no good ones. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 22 10:27:26 2011 Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2011 14:27:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGhK-00028Q-Iv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:27:26 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGhH-00028C-Dz for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:27:24 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LOQ00I00NZLYQ00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:26:28 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.133.66]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LOQ00IG6O43X720@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:26:28 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:26:32 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: sds@gnu.org Message-id: <83bowme6hz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ei1jv9hb.fsf@gnu.org> <837h7bv3r9.fsf@gnu.org> <8362muvoqp.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132 Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > From: Sam Steingold > Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:08:08 -0400 > > > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-22 09:00:30 +0300]: > > > > So the symbol is bound, but Emacs thinks it's not a function? What > > does this print? > > > > "./../src/oo/i386/emacs.exe" -batch -l ../lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el > > --eval "(print (symbol-function 'batch-byte-compile))" > > (closure (byte-compile--for-effect print-gensym-alist byte-compile--outbuffer by > te-compiler-error-flag byte-compile-free-assignments byte-compile-free-reference > s t) (&optional noforce) "Run `byte-compile-file' on the files remaining on the > command line. > Use this from the command line, with `-batch'; > it won't work in an interactive Emacs. > Each file is processed even if an error occurred previously. > For example, invoke \"emacs -batch -f batch-byte-compile $emacs/ ~/*.el\". > If NOFORCE is non-nil, don't recompile a file that seems to be > already up-to-date." (defvar command-line-args-left) (if (not noninteractive) (e > rror "`batch-byte-compile' is to be used only with -batch")) (let ((error nil)) > (while command-line-args-left (if (file-directory-p (expand-file-name (car comma > nd-line-args-left))) (let (source dest) (dolist (file (directory-files (car comm > and-line-args-left))) (if (and (string-match emacs-lisp-file-regexp file) (not ( > auto-save-file-name-p file)) (setq source (expand-file-name file (car command-li > ne-args-left))) (setq dest (byte-compile-dest-file source)) (file-exists-p dest) > (file-newer-than-file-p source dest)) (if (null (batch-byte-compile-file source > )) (setq error t))))) (if (or (not noforce) (let* ((source (car command-line-arg > s-left)) (dest (byte-compile-dest-file source))) (or (not (file-exists-p dest)) > (file-newer-than-file-p source dest)))) (if (null (batch-byte-compile-file (car > command-line-args-left))) (setq error t)))) (setq command-line-args-left (cdr co > mmand-line-args-left))) (kill-emacs (if error 1 0)))) Now I'm totally stumped: it shows contents of the symbol-function cell, but still claims that the function is undefined?? > >> why do I have oo and oo-spd?! > > > > oo/ is the unoptimized build, oo-spd/ the optimized one. Neat, ain't > > it? > > I would prefer to be able to specify this from the configure command line. Patches for that are welcome (although I personally would not have any use for such an option). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 06 15:13:14 2013 Received: (at 9132-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2013 20:13:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39921 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3BMn-0000ry-VR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:13:14 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:49823) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3BMl-0000ro-B2 for 9132-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:13:12 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3BLU-0002Jm-7S; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:11:52 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: 9132-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows References: X-Spook: fundamentalist Indigo NWO interception Zachawi Albania X-Ran: :GyBL:NS"VvLJ_gMhuk/S)[q0HayR1\=S*MXa#=y=R9,'&y*WmK&)K{ph9pl`Z7*vr@O!m X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:11:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Sam Steingold's message of "Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:11:59 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9132-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) I'm assuming this two year old report about a bootstrap failure is no longer relevant, but if it is, please reopen with a summary of the current situation. From unknown Tue Jun 17 01:33:08 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator