GNU bug report logs - #9119
[PATCH] modernize function definitions in gmalloc.c

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: dan.colascione <at> gmail.com, larsi <at> gnus.org, Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org, 9119 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#9119: [PATCH] modernize function definitions in gmalloc.c
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:15:14 -0400

On 4/14/2012 3:07 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:42:15 -0400
>> From: Ken Brown<kbrown <at> cornell.edu>
>> Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen<larsi <at> gnus.org>, dan.colascione <at> gmail.com,
>> 	9119 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>>> A more recent version of the patch was submitted in
>>>
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2011-12/msg00609.html
>>>
>>> with improvements by Paul and me. Maybe that should be applied instead.
>>
>> Sorry, what I wrote was unclear.  The patch I just cited isn't really a
>> more recent version of the one being discussed, but (with the
>> improvements by Paul and me) supersedes the latter.
>
> Are you sure you got the URL right?  Perhaps you meant one of the 2
> below instead?
>
>    http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2011-12/msg00716.html
>    http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2011-12/msg00720.html

I was just giving the URL of the beginning of the thread.  The URLs you 
cited contain the improvements by Paul and me that I referred to.  I 
should have said that.

The most recent version of the patch is in

  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2011-12/msg00720.html

in which Paul says, "And there's more where this came from -- that code 
is pretty crufty...."

So I don't know if that patch should just be applied now or if Paul 
plans to do more cleanup.

Ken

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.