GNU bug report logs -
#9115
`documentation' should let you choose whether to include `usage'
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>>> Yes, it's a bit inconvenient. But if you don't want the arglist, you
>>> should pass the output of documentation through help-split-fundoc.
>>> That should then return you the nil you're looking for.
>> The cdr of help-split-fundoc return nil as expected for functions, CL-style
>> function, but always nil for macros even if they are documented.
>
> Hmm... I don't understand: help-split-fundoc doesn't care if the
> docstring comes from a function, a macro, or a mushroom. Or maybe
> I don't understand what you're saying. Can you show some detail of what
> you do?
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(defun* foo (&rest args) nil)
(help-split-fundoc (documentation 'foo) nil)
=>("(nil &rest ARGS)")
(defun bar (&rest args) nil)
(help-split-fundoc (documentation 'bar) nil)
=>nil
(defmacro foo-1 (&rest args) "some doc." nil)
(help-split-fundoc (documentation 'foo-1) nil)
nil
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
But same here, it's ok i finally parse myself th output of documentation
to extract the first line, it works fine.(so i don't use
help-split-fundoc)
--
A+ Thierry
Get my Gnupg key:
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 219 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.