GNU bug report logs - #9102
"timeout 0 FOO" should timeout right away

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>

Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:35:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Full log


Message #23 received at 9102 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
To: James Youngman <jay <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>, 9102 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#9102: "timeout 0 FOO" should timeout right away
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 23:17:59 +0100
On 19/07/11 23:00, James Youngman wrote:
> 2011/7/17 Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>:
>> On 07/17/11 05:31, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> Well my reasoning for having "0" mean don't timeout,
>>> was to have an easy way in scripts to specify no timeout
>>
>> That's a good thing to have, but it could be specified in
>> a different way.  One possibility is the '1' (digit 1) option,
>> e.g.,  "timeout -1 FOO".  Or if that's too clever, we could
>> use some other letter for the option.
> 
> I'm not sure that's worked out so well for tail.   But if we are
> looking for an argument indicating we don't want a timeout, the
> argument "never" is quite clear.

I don't follow (pardon the pun).
This will "sleep(0)" between polls which takes 10% of my cpu here:

  tail ---disable -s0 -F nosuch

cheers,
Pádraig.




This bug report was last modified 13 years and 336 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.