Subject: bug#9069: (spam-initialize) should be automatic

From: Ted Zlatanov <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:26:39 -0500

On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:37:20 +0100 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]> wrote: 

LMI> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]> writes:
>> Dave Abrahams <[email-masked]> writes:
>> 
>>> ...at least in some cases.
>>> 
>>> I customized my group parameters and set the spam-process-destination to
>>> a different folder, and was absolutely baffled for the longest time as
>>> to why spam never got moved.  It seems to me that Gnus should detect
>>> cases where its own configuration obviously demands the use of spam.el
>>> and initialize it if necessary.
>> 
>> I agree.
>> 
>> Ted, where would the best place to put this initialisation be?

LMI> Ted, when you find some time, please have a peek at this one.  :-)

Sorry for the delay.

Can we do `spam-initialize' on group entry iff the spam group/topic
parameters are set AND it has not been run yet?  Or is that too
intrusive?

Ted