GNU bug report logs - #9006
24.0.50; Abort in unshow_buffer/kill-buffer

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stephen Berman <Stephen.Berman <at> rub.de>

Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 23:22:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 24.0.50

Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #56 received at 9006 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 9006 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, stephen.berman <at> gmx.net
Subject: Re: bug#9006: 24.0.50; Abort in unshow_buffer/kill-buffer
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 10:59:53 +0200
> How is vertical-motion relevant to the user typing C-g?

I suppose because `vertical-motion' can do all sorts of nasty things,
probably during fontification or scanning pbm images ...

> And why does this code normally works, if it is wrong?  What am I
> missing?

Which code?  The tabbar code "normally works" because it's not
interrupted by C-g.  `vertical-motion' "normally works" because it works
on the buffer shown in the selected window.  In the present case we (1)
temporarily show another buffer in the selected window and (2) interrupt
its execution in a state where that other buffer is still shown in that
window.

>> Allowing to kill a temporary buffer while it's shown in a window just to
>> calculate how far `vertical-motion' would go if the buffer were shown in
>> a window is asking for trouble.
>
> I don't understand how come vertical-motion ended up calling Lisp, as
> this Lisp backtrace shows:
>
>> Lisp Backtrace:
>> "set-window-buffer" (0xbfff66d4)
>> "set-window-buffer-start-and-point" (0xbfff6854)
>> "byte-code" (0xbfff6964)
>> "switch-to-prev-buffer" (0xbfff6c54)
>> "replace-buffer-in-windows" (0xbfff6dec)
>> "kill-buffer" (0xbfff6eb4)
>> "and" (0xbfff6fa8)
>> "vertical-motion" (0xbfff7d24)
>
> And why does that Lisp code call kill-buffer?

I suppose it's, as Stephen pointed out, that after `vertical-motion'
exited forcefully, exiting `with-temp-buffer' tries to find another
buffer to show in that window.  Obviously, this should not happen
because `vertical-motion' should have cleaned up its state before ...

martin




This bug report was last modified 12 years and 164 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.