GNU bug report logs - #8969
improve synchronization between examples in the manual and test cases

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#8969: closed (improve synchronization between examples in the
 manual and test cases)
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:12:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:10:41 +0100
with message-id <50ED6C51.1030107 <at> gmail.com>
and subject line close bug 8969
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #8969,
regarding improve synchronization between examples in the manual and test cases
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
8969: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8969
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-automake <at> gnu.org
Cc: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues <at> gmx.de>, automake-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: improve synchronization between examples in the manual and test cases
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 00:39:12 +0200

Severity: wishlist
thanks

Reference:
 <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2011-06/msg00220.html>

On Tuesday 28 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:24:13AM CEST:
> > On Monday 27 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > Sure.  Well, do they use some format already?
> > >
> > Well, there are only two of them, and both follows this format:
> > 
> > @c The test case for the setup described here is
> > @c     test/subdircond2.test
> > @c Try to keep it in sync.
> > 
> > (which is wrongish BTW, as the testsuite subdirectory is `tests/',
> > not `test/')
> > 
> > I'd go with one of these simple formats:
> >   @c Keep in sync with subdircond2.test
> 
> I like this one (with a trailing dot ;-)
> 
> ;-)
> 
I'll soon post a patch that improves the synchronization between
some examples from the manual and some test cases.  In the process
of writing it, I've noticed that various non-trivial examples from
the manual are not tested; and while I've remedied to part of this
problem with my patch, a lot remains to be done; so I'm opening
this bug to avoid forgetting about the issue.

Regards,
  Stefano

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
To: 8969-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: close bug 8969
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:10:41 +0100

Reference:
<http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8969>

One and a half year ago, I wrote :

> I'll soon post a patch that improves the synchronization between
> some examples from the manual and some test cases.  In the process
> of writing it, I've noticed that various non-trivial examples from
> the manual are not tested; and while I've remedied to part of this
> problem with my patch, a lot remains to be done; so I'm opening
> this bug to avoid forgetting about the issue.

I now think that keeping a bug report open about this is overkill,
and introduce more noise rather than helping out.  So, since the
referenced patch has been since long written and applied, and the
issues originally spotted have been fixed, I'm closing the report.

Regards,
  Stefano

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.