From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 29 13:33:39 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2011 17:33:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbydu-0008BC-6x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:33:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbxou-0003da-4u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:40:57 -0400 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5TGeou9009847 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:40:50 -0400 Received: from gmachine.redhat.com (vpn-8-172.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.8.172]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5TGemSA002552 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:40:49 -0400 From: Anthony Green To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org (The Gnus Bugfixing Girls + Boys) Subject: INBOX mail count is wrong Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:40:48 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23 X-Spam-Score: -10.6 (----------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:33:37 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -10.6 (----------) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Package: gnus Version: 5.110018 No Gnus v0.18 GNU Emacs 23.1.1 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.18.9) of 2011-02-01 on x86-003.build.bos.redhat.com GNUS is telling me... 323411774: INBOX When I try to look in INBOX, GNUS consumes all available memory. There should be maybe a couple hundred unread emails, tops. I'm using a local dovecot imap server. Thunderbird seems to work OK when I point it at my local dovecot. Other groups served up by this same dovecot instance appear to be OK. It's just INBOX that has this problem. Thanks for your help! AG --=-=-= Content-Type: application/emacs-lisp Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: User settings ------------------ Environment follows ------------------ (setq gnus-buffers '(# # # # #= # #)) (setq gnus-default-nntp-server "") (setq gnus-select-method '(nnimap "lcl" (nnimap-address "localhost") (nnimap-server-port 993) (nnimap-stream ssl) (nnimap-authinfo-file "/home/green/.imap.authinfo"))) (setq gnus-valid-select-methods '(("nntp" post address prompt-address physical-address) ("nnspool" post address) ("nnvirtual" post-mail virtual prompt-address) ("nnmbox" mail respool address) ("nnml" post-mail respool address) ("nnmh" mail respool address) ("nndir" post-mail prompt-address physical-address) ("nneething" none address prompt-address physical-address) ("nndoc" none address prompt-address) ("nnbabyl" mail address respool) ("nndraft" post-mail) ("nnfolder" mail respool address) ("nngateway" post-mail address prompt-address physical-address) ("nnweb" none) ("nnrss" none) ("nnagent" post-mail) ("nnimap" post-mail address prompt-address physical-address respool server= -marks) ("nnmaildir" mail respool address) ("nnnil" none) ("nnir" mail))) (setq gnus-group-change-level-function 'gnus-topic-change-level) (setq gnus-summary-mode-hook '(gnus-agent-mode)) (setq gnus-select-group-hook '(atg/select-message-account)) (setq gnus-group-catchup-group-hook '(gnus-topic-update-topic)) (setq gnus-exit-gnus-hook '(mm-destroy-postponed-undisplay-list)) (setq gnus-visible-headers '("^From:" "^Newsgroups:" "^Subject:" "^Date:" "^Followup-To:" "^Repl= y-To" "^Organization:" "^Summary:" "^Keywords:" "To:" "^[BGF]?Cc:" "^Posted= -To:" "^Mail-Copies-To:" "^Mail-Followup-To:" "^Apparently-To:" "^Gnus-Warn= ing:" "^Resent-From:" "^X-Sent:" "^User-Agent:" "^X-Operating-System:" "^X-= URL:")) (setq gnus-article-prepare-hook '(bbdb/gnus-pop-up-bbdb-buffer)) (setq gnus-startup-hook '(bbdb-insinuate-gnus)) (setq gnus-save-newsrc-hook '(bbdb-offer-save)) (setq gnus-group-mode-hook '(gnus-agent-mode gnus-topic-mode)) ;; (makeunbound 'gnus-use-article-prefetch) ;; (makeunbound 'gnus-asynchronous) ;; (makeunbound 'gnus-prefetched-article-deletion-strategy) ;; (makeunbound 'gnus-use-header-prefetch) ;; (makeunbound 'gnus-async-prefetch-article-p) ;; (makeunbound 'gnus-async-post-fetch-function) (setq gnus-posting-styles '((".*" ("From" nil)) ((lambda nil (equal atg/message-account "ml")) (address "green@moxielogic.com") ("From" "Anthony Green ") ("X-URL" "http://www.moxielogic.org/blog")) ((lambda nil (equal atg/message-account "sd")) (address "green@spindazzle.org") ("From" "Anthony Green ")) ((lambda nil (equal atg/message-account "rht")) (address "green@redhat.com") ("From" "Anthony Green ") (Organization "Red Hat") ("X-URL" "http://www.redhat.com")))) (setq gnus-server-mode-hook '(gnus-agent-mode)) (setq mm-charset-synonym-alist '((ibm866 . cp866) (unicode . utf-16-le) (ks_c_5601-1987 . cp949) (windows-31j . cp932) (utf8 . utf-8) (iso8859-1 . iso-8859-1) (iso_8859-1 . iso-8859-1))) (setq message-from-style 'angles) (setq message-send-mail-function 'smtpmail-send-it) (setq message-post-method '(nntp "news")) (setq message-generate-headers-first t) (setq message-setup-hook '(bbdb-insinuate-message)) (setq message-mode-hook '(#[nil "\302\030\303 !)\207" [gnus-article-copy gnus-setup-message-group nil gnus-configure-posti= ng-styles] 2] #[nil "\302 \211\020\211\021\207" [message-mailer message-newsreader gnus-extended-version] 2])) (setq message-header-setup-hook '(gnus-inews-insert-gcc)) --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 29 18:43:24 2011 Received: (at 8956-close) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2011 22:43:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qc3Tg-0006ee-Al for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:43:24 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qc3Tc-0006eP-Vr for 8956-close@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:43:22 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=quimbies.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qc3TQ-0005jW-UY; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:43:08 +0200 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: Anthony Green Subject: Re: bug#8956: INBOX mail count is wrong In-Reply-To: (Anthony Green's message of "Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:40:48 -0400") Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:28:35 +0200 Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAMFBMVEVcZIg4Mjnb3PL07vqI kbE9PlB3f6A4JAy0u9iYoMPQ0+wZCwOnrs1FTWzl4vXDyOTdsvCXAAACSElEQVQ4jWWSoYsbURDG R9VFBHpEHDVPhpKK9VFLqKhooCsqDiKOQEVFxPEo+QdWLMSsWTg4WFWeiYxYW5GFhTsTVdbs+SdK xRLzOt+8l16aDsR8v/fNNzMbKm0URdMoslap0hjjnEuzpqnJTKy1Hf8YqLEHKcDRKGVVJzqDLfSs bgpyplS2e/fhbZ03v/OH2/c9G+p7DyZqvN/26fH7/rHZCyiCQ/oojpZOF8BlLD26XmYqcnKcLiN9 qeP49oEbZTDEwdH5Ts4hoSmKPKbNsZzwdl2nQkIGEDMwvDt2PAEkxPGMXMlgiov47YJhRkc1eY5w qjEcfRr0JUCEM1q5kxhy1pf0y4PIdtLpZFhSaa04pgA9dhDDgpQHEQOZFYYlG2gSHGiVngwLAohC xrb3yQG8dNr2cj10ohdglXEMOMAnMAjTjp3L5H0wkPIhDHo5kjcMWgA5CX9ajMorcPSgbQlf49lO O5416GxoAcb47/CwaeNv4Q0tGVMafD5ewgd4Q4tvLsXR4b0YGKDkrj9mfgPRE0rTTb+R/0Yuz32j m4T2KWrPM80W0J+gH5KEmlB1PqPQJ0FRc4/T4aryfiDPAapvBYqP5OcPOoPP+GY4tqSegdcxikcd nOsJ/fwU+40XF+D6zeHqSS5xrg/nVFVa69WrBZ2D+XVF0Lk+BoDXybCqKtI7T+4GLALMh6NKwLrS a63Xuzt+fMOd5uvKA8gaRCctg5HXAUKt9erQHkb6AkjS6uv8PyB1xcFB/wcMpRjtzsFoNfxbmsEf UOhcxCnJY8sAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Mia Clarke & Ando Moor's _Guitargument_: "Guitargument Part 1" X-Hashcash: 1:23:110629:green@redhat.com::pNNW8luV1R2IkGd6:0EY4P X-Hashcash: 1:23:110629:8956@debbugs.gnu.org::xd6XiFsZ/5Bx6QZ0:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000RTNi MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1Qc3TQ-0005jW-UY X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1309992189.0185@36qwH8FK/zTetcG69lvcCA X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8956-close Cc: 8956-close@debbugs.gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: bugs@gnus.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) Anthony Green writes: > GNUS is telling me... > > 323411774: INBOX > > When I try to look in INBOX, GNUS consumes all available memory. There > should be maybe a couple hundred unread emails, tops. Sorry; Gnus doesn't support selecting groups that have extremely sparse message ranges like that. If you `c' the group, you may be able to enter it afterwards when new messages arrive, though. Fixing this properly in Gnus is on the schedule for the next Gnus release cycle, but that's not going to start any time soon. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 30 12:05:44 2011 Received: (at 8956) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2011 16:05:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcJkN-0000Rg-Cb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:05:43 -0400 Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.25]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcJkK-0000RR-4Y for 8956@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:05:41 -0400 Received: from mail02.corp.redhat.com (zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.5.42]) by mx4-phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5UG5Y39009978 for <8956@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:05:34 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:05:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Anthony Green To: 8956@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <29831198.137786.1309449934002.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: bug#8956: closed (Re: bug#8956: INBOX mail count is wrong) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.5.5.71] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.9_GA_2686 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/6.0.9_GA_2686) X-Spam-Score: -10.6 (----------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8956 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -10.6 (----------) Hi Larse, I don't see how GNUS is getting that huge range of messages though. When I talk manually to the imap server, I see this... . examine INBOX * OK [CLOSED] Previous mailbox closed. * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft) * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ()] Read-only mailbox. * 3665 EXISTS * 1 RECENT * OK [UNSEEN 3482] First unseen. * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1306668776] UIDs valid * OK [UIDNEXT 3669] Predicted next UID * OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 106] Highest . OK [READ-ONLY] Select completed. So I suspect that emacs/gnus is coming up with the crazy big message count on its own. Thanks, Anthony ----- Original Message ----- From: "GNU bug Tracking System" To: "Anthony Green" Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 6:44:02 PM Subject: bug#8956: closed (Re: bug#8956: INBOX mail count is wrong) Your bug report #8956: INBOX mail count is wrong which was filed against the gnus package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 8956@debbugs.gnu.org. -- 8956: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8956 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 30 12:32:43 2011 Received: (at 8956) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2011 16:32:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcKAU-0002dT-Nj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:32:42 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcKAR-0002dG-U3 for 8956@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:32:41 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=quimbies.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QcKAF-0007gg-Sq; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:32:27 +0200 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: Anthony Green Subject: Re: bug#8956: closed (Re: bug#8956: INBOX mail count is wrong) In-Reply-To: <29831198.137786.1309449934002.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> (Anthony Green's message of "Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:05:34 -0400 (EDT)") Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:32:24 +0200 Message-ID: References: <29831198.137786.1309449934002.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEU6FiR/OUkHAgZRIjQL BQkZDBOma3Lrp5N5AAACWklEQVQ4jVWTTW8bIRCGJ6HkbITCuVptcoYQ5exshp6xDTkbVeH//4S+ A1unHUvr1Tz7zhcD8YpfYa4wLY9ayrYWpteqSy5JPES6ZgDGp0zhULUAeBQRZQ0Fwygeh55EQIoi 3sW/0gicEQVuHynqSVbSiAtn9J58tuRpVIBQNVXJTCrGCLenQVBVLiNUDNYQmBJEBFBnbmNMi9ZG MYpUBUjmO2MckLFeZL4K0BlvoXfTe3PGUhwFFKpZGWsBWnemNyspRlU6K9fFZ1oAiLOqVAHka+RG 7IDnXi5GIQIQJCIV8CAZW70BG5WNIdg4cwxg3FQEG0bEMLqhTGEqxBsM/lE58Bh1cCjf/DXImw8k jVPwBIH0KDawjCTKGKCY7o7qjGuUZVhqxhhm4XCuUypyqCLYgdd011sj5pSyZDBeiXucgsHhAFRp 8pBJqzD9FacAwFW0XkakDuPEJeUAEDRzQEsGA8nyPQCWrp6kFCmm0a1HWiA5NT+2LwXMze0Nbss6 1iUJ4ZPbG5ccq0n5B6eieFt4tipLIQE2gPXp7rwtCHzBbFEbcbKRrvdrqpfzKkD2EoGJjzjn3yX1 V95W/jbij4OvD/zrUNJ28x6LKB41f25PbUvrTfHxVakctT4/vyzvZ5YM0z5fE64Bjvbha3kv335+ A5D7mt768hNg21HqjygXNa7uRbx4mWnSVQMg9Od1EftOkuoAx34vfqn21OciY1aFL/06wowG5J7N +yj7eZ4JMOh0WztqhZdlT4GZZNUarlBzOA8EWXinEm+/rss/tt3GmP4DvM0/sfoHITvs33DnIDQA AAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Genesis's _And Then There Were Three_: "Deep In The Motherlode" X-Hashcash: 1:23:110630:green@redhat.com::HFZYBH3UQ0ew4VhN:0KOlk X-Hashcash: 1:23:110630:8956@debbugs.gnu.org::gtJynKc662upE8t6:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000QXqV MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1QcKAF-0007gg-Sq X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1310056348.05993@vrGEq3XLkMkLKez9qTV+2Q X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8956 Cc: 8956@debbugs.gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: bugs@gnus.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) Anthony Green writes: > I don't see how GNUS is getting that huge range of messages though. > > When I talk manually to the imap server, I see this... > > . examine INBOX > * OK [CLOSED] Previous mailbox closed. > * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft) > * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ()] Read-only mailbox. > * 3665 EXISTS > * 1 RECENT > * OK [UNSEEN 3482] First unseen. > * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1306668776] UIDs valid > * OK [UIDNEXT 3669] Predicted next UID > * OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 106] Highest > . OK [READ-ONLY] Select completed. > > So I suspect that emacs/gnus is coming up with the crazy big message > count on its own. Yes, that's odd. Does the message count fix itself if you `M-g' the group? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 30 13:01:11 2011 Received: (at 8956) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2011 17:01:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcKc2-0004tj-Od for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:01:11 -0400 Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.25]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcKbz-0004tL-OK for 8956@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:01:09 -0400 Received: from mail02.corp.redhat.com (zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.5.42]) by mx4-phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5UH11UN018939; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:01:01 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:01:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Anthony Green To: bugs@gnus.org Message-ID: <617706535.139176.1309453261123.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: bug#8956: closed (Re: bug#8956: INBOX mail count is wrong) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.5.5.71] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.9_GA_2686 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/6.0.9_GA_2686) X-Spam-Score: -10.6 (----------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8956 Cc: 8956@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -10.6 (----------) No, it doesn't. AG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen" To: "Anthony Green" Cc: bugs@gnus.org, 8956@debbugs.gnu.org Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 12:32:24 PM Subject: Re: bug#8956: closed (Re: bug#8956: INBOX mail count is wrong) Anthony Green writes: > I don't see how GNUS is getting that huge range of messages though. > > When I talk manually to the imap server, I see this... > > . examine INBOX > * OK [CLOSED] Previous mailbox closed. > * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft) > * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ()] Read-only mailbox. > * 3665 EXISTS > * 1 RECENT > * OK [UNSEEN 3482] First unseen. > * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1306668776] UIDs valid > * OK [UIDNEXT 3669] Predicted next UID > * OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 106] Highest > . OK [READ-ONLY] Select completed. > > So I suspect that emacs/gnus is coming up with the crazy big message > count on its own. Yes, that's odd. Does the message count fix itself if you `M-g' the group? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 30 13:08:50 2011 Received: (at 8956) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2011 17:08:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcKjS-00054X-F4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:08:50 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcKjQ-00054I-Hd for 8956@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:08:49 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=quimbies.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QcKj9-0008CW-Hv; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:08:31 +0200 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: Anthony Green Subject: Re: bug#8956: closed (Re: bug#8956: INBOX mail count is wrong) In-Reply-To: <617706535.139176.1309453261123.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> (Anthony Green's message of "Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:01:01 -0400 (EDT)") Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:08:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <617706535.139176.1309453261123.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEXnsimyfivSnCn81j3z wS1hPx7db0p+AAACd0lEQVQ4jU2TzXbjIAyFFUL2Fgl7kPG+CX4AYjP7kg7v/ypzhdNOlZOehk+6 +kGQDHNxcSIsrBZZ8oNECPb3RIXJDKcBmQLZQu6TS+ATkcUHvkLqXu/xpj5Niv6qhTSKUq3MzvvG 00QHKEal9pyX2LyfuH1Srnt9G1UA9+LWWn+xjLOMs0z4Ppl9b26q8YbjwhBZs0ptnn1e664e3HiB 135E+Niy2tJenie3NM4osOb7az+vQx1NRCfae9cKtUn8mTJaMBIolJqEMKKgzAQ3P4K2gVLVop+M DbDYYsCwQkCxK2KhN5mQJEqb8dsMAVRIsbcgW4on6TyNlodV8l93CVtaWLpzFq7rG7mvh1hJ3oxb 0AR51SmTmU2oYhcXI+cTyFURop5Z0ib21GPM+YHmrmMIK/3JUgHMOPgwZpnsIHSZoSS1xCYz1MNF aBDyPVUJtQjucK7ViEMfCnqHUtIpYcJoQzeBwgGeA4RXzlZXARHWZmoN4d+gaOfidCWo+SQKTHRz fth9X6MbI2lcRCzAMueMKvZcwgAJubEcxbhzznex2AHSJKQVDvA5a+fpPas6QACI7qpA9oNohEhE juUKgAegIblYRCA3a4QO644dGSEKkFt2nRXAx3cI5q65U0HyjgY/sFJuP8ZenfaHzvXy7Qm66Ri7 Ko0Rmf5ZNSGG+BvUA+hwpavYeJDH1vhXHd1GHgD/vMGlIXIT50d67C42Y0hdcJfQ4qNiwjK9F/DU 9UFBCe9/3GCbIo7I+K4em3rOA/w31ifo8LrDD2iOvfNNNSHFcv4B7PC8nGbf4kj/W6rJrTQL4J2c ceecnig0mChx2vwNzSPJ+R/I2LgMeSdGfwAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Genesis's _Nursery Cryme_: "The Return Of The Giant Hogweed" X-Hashcash: 1:23:110630:8956@debbugs.gnu.org::fW0I2QNDevOvel72:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000I4zJ X-Hashcash: 1:23:110630:green@redhat.com::nPiE+B+Ik2F179b7:0b5h0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1QcKj9-0008CW-Hv X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1310058511.65031@9+PBYpTFT06pcomgGJjTjg X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8956 Cc: 8956@debbugs.gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: bugs@gnus.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) Anthony Green writes: > No, it doesn't. Do you have any Gnus Agent or cache files for this group? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 30 13:13:54 2011 Received: (at 8956) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2011 17:13:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcKoL-0005BI-Nl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:13:54 -0400 Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.25]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcKoJ-0005B5-00 for 8956@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:13:52 -0400 Received: from mail02.corp.redhat.com (zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.5.42]) by mx4-phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5UHDida020789; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:13:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:13:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Anthony Green To: bugs@gnus.org Message-ID: <694147543.139591.1309454024889.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: bug#8956: closed (Re: bug#8956: INBOX mail count is wrong) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.5.5.72] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.9_GA_2686 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/6.0.9_GA_2686) X-Spam-Score: -10.6 (----------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8956 Cc: 8956@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -10.6 (----------) I'm not sure how to tell. I can delete ~/.newsrc* and still see the problem. I'm not familiar with gnus-agent. How do I make sure it's not impacting this? Thanks, AG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen" To: "Anthony Green" Cc: bugs@gnus.org, 8956@debbugs.gnu.org Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 1:08:16 PM Subject: Re: bug#8956: closed (Re: bug#8956: INBOX mail count is wrong) Anthony Green writes: > No, it doesn't. Do you have any Gnus Agent or cache files for this group? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 30 14:01:44 2011 Received: (at 8956) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2011 18:01:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcLYd-0000zN-I3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:01:43 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcLYb-0000zA-8G for 8956@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:01:42 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=quimbies.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QcLYP-0000df-TU; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:01:29 +0200 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: Anthony Green Subject: Re: bug#8956: closed (Re: bug#8956: INBOX mail count is wrong) In-Reply-To: (Anthony Green's message of "Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:13:44 -0400 (EDT)") Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:59:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEU8ODqZrsZzc3nD4fjS 7Pu61/DuNjUgAAACcElEQVQ4jWWUy3rjIAyFBan3Bps9Jsk+DrCvC9kH27z/q8wRdvtNZ5QsWn6k oxuhunlfYbHuOSfvPf73PmTiw/Z3rPh+25bIOSKpTtPOOekkuaunWohEPqLEqSgtwegCUIkuphRl lJn3xaheOk139rCkyiqUsmLOBeHEpNzgyZRevqrk4NOeWUcq3Q3s0cvy6XAixchAkbDfQFktt/iq 6tUAsgFQDHopkJN2LWdL9NGAFmZXZQsJ+ZzADJlUfIst5Lj5/HYCSStNcmcP1YvQystPO9WKCNSF lq7uWt1b+Do0FF3CENmjwzn6BjAdoDtDdRmd36LS+sdjTA3gPnrhn98AGieYlapb/gHXfAIc82yW vwBrWLGxtg8ncHTLxhMGI1KqkPcLBmglJnrNJtLk7D0nnrefNR02cChcumZcR08OIBtIJE8Akdmd HjsDJ+2lAe+L4+sNoEBn4ZEgsfnVciTZPDzlxX4c25N66CG0O0Ct/e1cK3Lm3cTH5pH7j3Pd5Fi1 I8ehDIMVgJfXi7FaC9FTIz9uzSEEYcqE/VKHxytYaKQUIFQBJsQeE1duiMX5SeS0TlrU/XNM6JXU EmC9bkzLNDlf33tCKLGsQ072gvVJcbV6yuF5Y/GyfDLosFspvqGd83Nk8fn1BVAwQg9gAdIzZKzP Ur+uebYSQ7r73jo9ZgCIxw1gseoEyo3pcRRo0tU/ex62CbOdXOePUEmhmoeoUU1bmGmyzkfPoQC8 n/l9lCEsEoXg1SdTqVUdIcktDlqtbsBTAQgNlNwsvJx2d+zLvZL6bfzbwHlUSvm3pYh+YjPJ539J CBCL/wNoBnz+AD9uve8903ikAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Genesis's _Trespass_: "Stagnation" X-Hashcash: 1:23:110630:8956@debbugs.gnu.org::ybDz5eUdEvUH5Atr:000000000000000000000000000000000000000006YxX X-Hashcash: 1:23:110630:green@redhat.com::7/CH2aCKp/Rjrkpp:0BdjD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1QcLYP-0000df-TU X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1310061690.00349@qY973oKbUhAY3rCqRZF0gQ X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8956 Cc: 8956@debbugs.gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: bugs@gnus.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) Anthony Green writes: > I'm not sure how to tell. I can delete ~/.newsrc* and still see the > problem. I'm not familiar with gnus-agent. How do I make sure it's > not impacting this? I'm sorry; I was confused. I forgot that you were using Emacs 23. has been completely rewritten for Emacs 24, and I think problems like these have been fixed in Emacs 24. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From unknown Fri Aug 15 15:36:29 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator