Subject: bug#8890: 23.3; message writing slows emacs

From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:01:28 +0200

Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]> writes:

> Yes, getting the timer to work, canceling it when needed, etc...  It's
> fiddly.  Especially when compared to the simplicity of
> progress-reporter-update/progress-reporter-done.

If it's possible to get the timer to work, then I think the rest is just
a small matter of programming.

While the process-reporter interface is very clean and nice, it does
require that you pass around the reporter object, which can be fiddly,
too -- but it's a fiddliness that all the users of the code have to
relate to.  Whereas a hysteresis-safe `message' would just work without
anybody thinking about it.

I mean, if we could get it to work.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/