From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:47:10 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#8871 <8871@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#8871 <8871@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Bug with "sort -i" ? Reply-To: bug#8871 <8871@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2025 01:47:10 +0000 retitle 8871 Bug with "sort -i" ? reassign 8871 coreutils submitter 8871 Al Bogner severity 8871 normal tag 8871 notabug thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 15 12:03:50 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jun 2011 16:03:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWsZJ-0007Xb-Ng for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:03:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWsFU-000742-B3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:43:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWsFN-00043u-Vx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:43:15 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:43283) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWsFN-00043q-P2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:43:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55150) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWsFM-00063N-4y for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:43:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWsFK-00043Q-IU for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:43:11 -0400 Received: from mx08.lb01.inode.at ([62.99.145.8]:45960 helo=mx.inode.at) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWsFJ-00042c-Sd for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:43:10 -0400 Received: from [85.127.58.83] (port=4882 helo=ml082.pinguin.uni.cc) by smartmx-08.inode.at with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWsFF-0003kb-TU for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:43:06 +0200 Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:42:51 +0200 From: Al Bogner To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Subject: Bug with "sort -i" ? Message-ID: <20110615174251.153de47f@ml082.pinguin.uni.cc> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.24.4; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:03:48 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) Hi, this looks like a bug for me: var=3D"=CF=86=CE=B8=CE=B9=CE=BD=CF=8C=CF=80=CF=89=CF=81=CE=BF,=CE=BA=CE=B9= =CF=83=CF=83=CF=8C=CF=82,=CE=A6=CF=8D=CE=BB=CE=BB=CE=BF" echo "$var" | sed -e 's/.*/\L&/' -e 's/,/_/g' | tr '_' '\n' | \ sort -f -u =CE=BA=CE=B9=CF=83=CF=83=CF=8C=CF=82 =CF=86=CE=B8=CE=B9=CE=BD=CF=8C=CF=80=CF=89=CF=81=CE=BF =CF=86=CF=8D=CE=BB=CE=BB=CE=BF echo "$var" | sed -e 's/.*/\L&/' -e 's/,/_/g' | tr '_' '\n' | \ sort -f -i -u =CF=86=CE=B8=CE=B9=CE=BD=CF=8C=CF=80=CF=89=CF=81=CE=BF Al From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 15 16:09:05 2011 Received: (at 8871) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jun 2011 20:09:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWwOf-0004hC-7j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:09:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWwOb-0004gh-Vw for 8871@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:09:03 -0400 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5FK8the028625 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:08:55 -0400 Received: from [10.3.113.113] (ovpn-113-113.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.113]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5FK8s0C004927; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:08:55 -0400 Message-ID: <4DF91151.4010409@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:08:49 -0600 From: Eric Blake Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110419 Red Hat/3.1.10-1.el6_0 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Al Bogner Subject: Re: bug#8871: Bug with "sort -i" ? References: <20110615174251.153de47f@ml082.pinguin.uni.cc> In-Reply-To: <20110615174251.153de47f@ml082.pinguin.uni.cc> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig79D3A440BCF97BA651FD3CD8" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.25 X-Spam-Score: -10.3 (----------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8871 Cc: 8871@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -10.3 (----------) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig79D3A440BCF97BA651FD3CD8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable retitle 8871 RFE enhance sort --debug -i tag 8871 wishlist thanks On 06/15/2011 09:42 AM, Al Bogner wrote: > Hi, >=20 > this looks like a bug for me: Thanks for the report. However, most likely this is not a bug in sort, but a misunderstanding on your part about how locales affect which bytes (or byte sequences, in multi-byte locales) are deemed printable. >=20 > var=3D"=CF=86=CE=B8=CE=B9=CE=BD=CF=8C=CF=80=CF=89=CF=81=CE=BF,=CE=BA=CE= =B9=CF=83=CF=83=CF=8C=CF=82,=CE=A6=CF=8D=CE=BB=CE=BB=CE=BF" >=20 >=20 > echo "$var" | sed -e 's/.*/\L&/' -e 's/,/_/g' | tr '_' '\n' | \ Wow, that's a complex way to change comma into newline. Why not just: var=3D"=CF=86=CE=B8=CE=B9=CE=BD=CF=8C=CF=80=CF=89=CF=81=CE=BF =CE=BA=CE=B9=CF=83=CF=83=CF=8C=CF=82 =CE=A6=CF=8D=CE=BB=CE=BB=CE=BF" echo "$var" | sort ... [I'm assuming you've distilled this from a larger example where the complex processing was actually useful rather than starting from the right string to begin with] > sort -f -u > =CE=BA=CE=B9=CF=83=CF=83=CF=8C=CF=82 > =CF=86=CE=B8=CE=B9=CE=BD=CF=8C=CF=80=CF=89=CF=81=CE=BF > =CF=86=CF=8D=CE=BB=CE=BB=CE=BF >=20 > echo "$var" | sed -e 's/.*/\L&/' -e 's/,/_/g' | tr '_' '\n' | \ > sort -f -i -u > =CF=86=CE=B8=CE=B9=CE=BD=CF=8C=CF=80=CF=89=CF=81=CE=BF Let's put the new 'sort --debug' option to use to point out the difference a locale makes (and note that on my machine, the C locale deems non-ASCII bytes as non-printable, even though they still render just fine on my terminal). First, without -i: $ echo "$var" | LC_ALL=3Den_US.UTF-8 sort --debug -fu sort: using `en_US.UTF-8' sorting rules =CE=BA=CE=B9=CF=83=CF=83=CF=8C=CF=82 ______ =CF=86=CE=B8=CE=B9=CE=BD=CF=8C=CF=80=CF=89=CF=81=CE=BF _________ =CE=A6=CF=8D=CE=BB=CE=BB=CE=BF _____ $ echo "$var" | LC_ALL=3DC sort --debug -fu sort: using simple byte comparison =CE=A6=CF=8D=CE=BB=CE=BB=CE=BF __________ =CE=BA=CE=B9=CF=83=CF=83=CF=8C=CF=82 ____________ =CF=86=CE=B8=CE=B9=CE=BD=CF=8C=CF=80=CF=89=CF=81=CE=BF __________________ Did you notice how the line lengths differ between the en_US.UTF-8 locale (which knows how to treat multi-byte characters as single characters) and the C locale (where every byte is a character, and the multi-byte UTF-8 entities are treated as multiple non-printable character= s)? Then adding -i: $ echo "$var" | LC_ALL=3Den_US.UTF-8 sort --debug -fui sort: using `en_US.UTF-8' sorting rules =CE=BA=CE=B9=CF=83=CF=83=CF=8C=CF=82 ______ =CF=86=CE=B8=CE=B9=CE=BD=CF=8C=CF=80=CF=89=CF=81=CE=BF _________ =CE=A6=CF=8D=CE=BB=CE=BB=CE=BF _____ $ echo "$var" | LC_ALL=3DC sort --debug -fui coreutils/src/sort: using simple byte comparison =CF=86=CE=B8=CE=B9=CE=BD=CF=8C=CF=80=CF=89=CF=81=CE=BF __________________ When all of the bytes are ignored as non-printable, then all three lines are identical, hence -u prints only one line. However, I think this report _did_ find a valid tangential issue - the 'sort --debug' option ought to be enhanced to use a different character than '_' when flagging which bytes were ignored by -i as unprintable characters. That is, I would find it much nicer to see: $ echo 'a=CF=86c' | LC_ALL=3DC sort --debug -i a=CF=86c _.._ to make it obvious that the two bytes for =CF=86 were being ignored from = the particular sort field that I requested, because -i was in effect. Same thing goes for other sort options, such as 'sort -k1n' ignoring characters after the end of the first parsed number. --=20 Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --------------enig79D3A440BCF97BA651FD3CD8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Red Hat - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJN+RFWAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqX44IAJaIe0KBKLbJsh3ObdXc0x3u uSCk7fLhEs8BOB4NmoUPc3JA6MEIH4wBfioOT2RIlMPjzKwHyGqa1AWZmjpQPMme RQhRR5kAleZxPeG1HEs5RzRHjNT4Ss1FupsaGyQji2qu2juhUPy6eTCc5K9xkxrf 2/Lclv5Mr1SJtY+CkTYMbupODjxh+046+52fE9r6zmm7I9/VB4DGoey3okR8yqUO +MozpvWCCzjm9/q3dkxTpryooQ1wTJg049bk0CpdBaXkRY8x/rGb+WurbP5iRXL6 RMGMxD2usuiokQF27Frnl3LZfCDkIgRB/qvgdKwkHz/lFon36FbzBOCcRz6IA14= =D4iK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig79D3A440BCF97BA651FD3CD8-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 15 17:41:16 2011 Received: (at 8871) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jun 2011 21:41:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWxpr-0006m7-MB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:41:15 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWxpp-0006lu-4p for 8871@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:41:14 -0400 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5FLf7Mp010935 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:41:07 -0400 Received: from [10.3.113.113] (ovpn-113-113.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.113]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5FLf6TH030219; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:41:06 -0400 Message-ID: <4DF926F2.7020905@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:41:06 -0600 From: Eric Blake Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110419 Red Hat/3.1.10-1.el6_0 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Al Bogner , 8871@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#8871: Bug with "sort -i" ? References: <20110615174251.153de47f@ml082.pinguin.uni.cc> <4DF91151.4010409@redhat.com> <20110615232823.0833ce6d@ml082.pinguin.uni.cc> In-Reply-To: <20110615232823.0833ce6d@ml082.pinguin.uni.cc> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig153E046B9291B15FF1224330" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.11 X-Spam-Score: -10.3 (----------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8871 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -10.3 (----------) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig153E046B9291B15FF1224330 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [re-adding the list] On 06/15/2011 03:28 PM, Al Bogner wrote: >> When all of the bytes are ignored as non-printable, then all three >> lines are identical, hence -u prints only one line. >=20 > Ok and thanks. I had a different understanding of non-printable. Non-printable translates to whether isprint(3) returns 0 for a given byte (single-byte locale, like C), or iswprint(3) returns 0 for a given wide character (Unicode character composed from UTF-8 bytes, multi-byte locale like de_DE.UTF-8). These functions are locale-specific (a byte value may be deemed printable in one locale but not another). Furthermore, isprint(0xa0) and iswprint(0xa0) may give different results within the same locale, if the implementation is trying to reject incomplete UTF-8 sequences and only understands complete wchar_t as characters, in which case any code that uses isprint() on the individual bytes of UTF-8 rather than iswprint() on the wchar_t of each composed Unicode character will get the (unfortunate) results that no multi-byte characters are recognized as printable. Factor into this mess the fact that upstream coreutils still lacks decent multi-byte handling in a lot of utilities. Various distros have add-on patches for better wchar_t handling, but as of yet they have not been consolidated into something that is easily maintainable and adds no overhead to the single-byte C locale situation. --=20 Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --------------enig153E046B9291B15FF1224330 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Red Hat - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJN+SbyAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqKPUIAKla6K3GB7+RzV5F8rBSszSv 8ecHoMg90O24qwzxwYRa18mPDjsTE6dnh6rbl4EBbd1x9IhuXjMr41J8D8BrvgLo 8mKLl/f5rS9MHTyV5+N5QCMm0rQf+/ksXlqaDSb09iQKMkhLo+OBdEG/WZWwB/nX qjpJMcjEKbxq9l3p+PjsAm8mJOpq6bWrSbNJ2WzKO3lQpXBYWdJQ8NnlVE+kREc0 37sDaRj7RBvIeTYNOLFznzNLVswgWl6S8FbsjipgVLRJoGbbufFIza6UG+tUDMlu 47fGrJrSVq60Ceu/xLEOMU+SNFDKTs6s9LnUotWz8Nioku+P5GYxUDzdTwT/KMI= =aM4Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig153E046B9291B15FF1224330-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 16 05:50:55 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2011 09:50:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QX9Dz-0006Z0-7j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 05:50:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QX9Dw-0006Yo-Lx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 05:50:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QX9Dl-0006rr-Uf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 05:50:47 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:37324) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QX9Dl-0006rl-Kd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 05:50:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48554) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QX9Df-0003Ai-Un for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 05:50:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QX9DZ-0006qS-GG for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 05:50:35 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:42887 helo=mx1.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QX9DZ-0006q8-2R for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 05:50:29 -0400 Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5081190975 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:50:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:50:25 +0200 From: Philipp Thomas To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#8871: Bug with "sort -i" ? Message-ID: <20110616095025.GC11744@paradies.suse.de> References: <20110615174251.153de47f@ml082.pinguin.uni.cc> <4DF91151.4010409@redhat.com> <20110615232823.0833ce6d@ml082.pinguin.uni.cc> <4DF926F2.7020905@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DF926F2.7020905@redhat.com> X-Operating-System: openSUSE - Kernel Linux 3.0.0-rc2-1-desktop x86_64 Organization: SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, =?iso-8859-1?Q?G?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=3A_Jeff_Hawn=2C_Jennifer_Guild=2C_Felix_Imend=F6rffer=2C?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?_HRB_21284_=28AG_N=FCrnberg=29?= User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) * Eric Blake (eblake@redhat.com) [20110616 00:00]: > been consolidated into something that is easily maintainable and adds no > overhead to the single-byte C locale situation. I at least doubt that there is a solution that adds no overhead. Philipp From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 16 09:34:03 2011 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2011 13:34:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXChu-0000bT-Qr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:34:03 -0400 Received: from mx.meyering.net ([82.230.74.64]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXChr-0000az-Qu for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:34:01 -0400 Received: by rho.meyering.net (Acme Bit-Twister, from userid 1000) id 59C7260908; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:18:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Jim Meyering To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: not a bug Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:18:31 +0200 Message-ID: <878vt2nf54.fsf@rho.meyering.net> Lines: 6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) tags 8871 + notabug close 8871 thanks As you've probably gathered, this is not a bug. This message marks the "issue" as such and closes it. From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:47:10 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator