GNU bug report logs - #8789
23.3; debug backtrace buffer changes window on step-through

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Pete Beardmore <pete.beardmore <at> msn.com>

Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:28:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 23.3

Done: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
To: 8789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#8789: 23.3; debug backtrace buffer changes window on step-through
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:25:39 +0200
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:

> > I can use `debug' to invoke the debugger directly, which
> > prevents such surprises.
>
> 1. Not if you put `debug' in `file-remote-p'.  Or in some function
> that then calls `file-remote-p.  Or then calls some function that
> calls file-remote-p'...

I agree that this is problematic.

> 3. But I also think that it should be enough, for this problematic
> mode line enhancement, to simply call a duplicate of `file-remote-p'
> and not `file-remote-p' itself, which is used by all kinds of code.
>
> If that duplicate (e.g., `mode-line-file-remote-p') is called only by
> the mode-line code then that should greatly reduce, if not eliminate,
> this problem for the debugger.

But do you really think that this is the right approach?  E.g. in
dired+, we use (:eval ...) in the dired mode-string.  It's not very
useful to create a duplicate of all lisp functions we call in this form
only because of the fact that they are used for the mode-line.

And, in the case of `file-remote-p', it wouldn't even be enough to
duplicate just this function.  We would have to duplicate any function that
could be called by `file-remote-p' as well.


Michael.




This bug report was last modified 12 years and 223 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.