Subject: Re: bug#8776: rx has nothing for `explicitly numbered group construct'

From: Chong Yidong <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:13:12 -0400

[email-masked] writes:

> rx.el in 23.1 through 24.50 has nothing for a regexp notation
> of "explicitly numbered group" construct incorporated in 23.1.
>
> Maybe would it be something like,
>
> `(group 'NUM ...)' or `(group-n NUM ...)'
>
> for `\(?NUM: ... \)', where NUM is an integer?

group-n sounds good.  I've added it; thanks for the suggestion.