From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:40:43 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#8740 <8740@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#8740 <8740@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.0.50; Modeline in the [*About GNU Emacs*] buffer Reply-To: bug#8740 <8740@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 17:40:43 +0000 retitle 8740 24.0.50; Modeline in the [*About GNU Emacs*] buffer reassign 8740 emacs submitter 8740 Dani Moncayo severity 8740 wishlist thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 27 11:27:47 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2011 15:27:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QPyx1-0000xD-1b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2011 11:27:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QPywz-0000wz-8Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2011 11:27:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPywt-0007fA-C1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2011 11:27:40 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RFC_ABUSE_POST, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:50438) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPywt-0007f6-Aj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2011 11:27:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPyws-0001KB-Gf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2011 11:27:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPywr-0007el-Ql for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2011 11:27:38 -0400 Received: from mail-yi0-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:42022) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPywr-0007ec-Mt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2011 11:27:37 -0400 Received: by yib18 with SMTP id 18so1018658yib.0 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:27:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=R8Zf9tY12+0/gLdwhwRuBFnQMC4Lwd5oDxAyaHD+5OE=; b=Yk+bEIsSmEMWvGz11rgDxR/2Iy2+zfCMlPHQC+5aRMQ2OKGhkakewB1VfcQc37tWD+ h9ajYDN1rkdoOIYoEsP8eMYmawft2e7E50TSbovmjerAi6gRLIlVRA6vnMNFiq3QuLtZ zrb7N2e9qGx4qwD4fvkKUyojbIGfUwvjuewt0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=YGZjdVuL430m5OHj3dBfeuoXcv8In6CkKl21mLrLIk888MDg9tbksxh3nKNLfo1GWG QPqZVR4tIencadmYWRQxJ1K1Y7nhdO4OzlLl/vk2CeH5rFh+sdu4/7/guqzLkTq/ETpm /YsPyVx7sfD5NqfxGSi0pcECVtygonxOCjGxE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.67.7 with SMTP id u7mr2167205agk.103.1306510057070; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:27:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.50.15 with HTTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:27:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 17:27:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: 24.0.50; Modeline in the [*About GNU Emacs*] buffer From: Dani Moncayo To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) Severity: wishlist I don't understand why the modeline has to be special for the [*About GNU Emacs*] buffer. I'd like it to be standard, like in any other buffer. If you disagree, at least I'd like to suggest that the filling character was chosen like in the standard case, i.e., space in graphical and hyphen in text-only mode. TIA In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt6.1.7600) of 2011-05-23 on 3249CTO Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.5) --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/build/include' -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 28 13:47:08 2011 Received: (at 8740-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2011 17:47:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QQNbQ-0005wt-Le for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 13:47:08 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QQNbP-0005wX-22 for 8740-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 13:47:07 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38250) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQNbI-0007WV-UF; Sat, 28 May 2011 13:47:01 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: 8740-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#8740: 24.0.50; Modeline in the [*About GNU Emacs*] buffer References: X-Spook: Gazprom mindwar Ruby Ridge 22nd SAS Legion of Doom Ortega X-Ran: Ax:F~2?RjOO83g"DYl,)U{#k0fP[~XoD9=EP_ozOvi7+i7_$l>f-<)XBovR=eu0? User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8740-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) Version: 24.1 Dani Moncayo wrote: > I don't understand why the modeline has to be special for the [*About > GNU Emacs*] buffer Me neither (the initial splash screen has a standard modeline). Changed to match. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 28 19:30:53 2011 Received: (at 8740) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2011 23:30:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QQSy5-0003vI-H5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 19:30:53 -0400 Received: from vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.146]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QQSy4-0003v8-7b for 8740@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 19:30:52 -0400 Received: from furball (c-71-192-165-84.hsd1.ct.comcast.net [71.192.165.84]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4SNUkgF005983 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 28 May 2011 19:30:46 -0400 Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 903CB16031F; Sat, 28 May 2011 19:30:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Chong Yidong To: Dani Moncayo Subject: Re: bug#8740: 24.0.50; Modeline in the [*About GNU Emacs*] buffer References: Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 19:30:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Fri, 27 May 2011 17:27:37 +0200") Message-ID: <874o4exv16.fsf@stupidchicken.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.146 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8740 Cc: 8740@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Dani Moncayo writes: > I don't understand why the modeline has to be special for the [*About > GNU Emacs*] buffer. Me neither, especially since it only affects the non-graphic version. I've remove the gratuitous lines from startup.el. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 28 19:33:27 2011 Received: (at 8740) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2011 23:33:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QQT0Z-0003yw-PL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 19:33:27 -0400 Received: from vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.145]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QQT0Y-0003yj-J0 for 8740@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 19:33:26 -0400 Received: from furball (c-71-192-165-84.hsd1.ct.comcast.net [71.192.165.84]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4SNXLQf003275 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 28 May 2011 19:33:21 -0400 Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3027E16031F; Sat, 28 May 2011 19:33:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Chong Yidong To: Dani Moncayo Subject: Re: bug#8740: 24.0.50; Modeline in the [*About GNU Emacs*] buffer References: <874o4exv16.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 19:33:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <874o4exv16.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Sat, 28 May 2011 19:30:45 -0400") Message-ID: <87zkm6wgcf.fsf@stupidchicken.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.145 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8740 Cc: 8740@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Chong Yidong writes: > Me neither, especially since it only affects the non-graphic version. Whoops, I was working on the post-Glenn version (who missed a spot). Anyway, it's a good change. From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:40:43 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator