GNU bug report logs - #8695
I have error on date (+8 m) and i

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#8695: closed (I have error on date (+8 m) and i )
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 14:38:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:37:15 +0200
with message-id <87pqkz923o.fsf <at> rho.meyering.net>
and subject line Re: bug#8695: I have error on date (+8 m) and i
has caused the GNU bug report #8695,
regarding I have error on date (+8 m) and i 
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
8695: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8695
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: root <root <at> host.magic-srv.com>
To: bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: I have error on date (+8 m) and i 
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 11:50:18 -0500

do change it and not change give ok 
but when i review it give me +8 m
so what the problem is ? 

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
To: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
Cc: root <root <at> host.magic-srv.com>, 8695-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#8695: I have error on date (+8 m) and i
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:37:15 +0200

Eric Blake wrote:
> tags 8695 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On 05/18/2011 10:50 AM, root wrote:
>> do change it and not change give ok
>> but when i review it give me +8 m
>> so what the problem is ?
>
> Thanks for the report.  However, I cannot decipher what you are asking.
>
> Possibly you are tripping up on a FAQ?
> http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/#The-date-command-is-not-working-right_002e
>
> Please demonstrate what you typed, what 'date' actually output, and what
> you were expecting 'date' to output.  Also, knowing your timezone might
> be relevant.
>
> You might have better success if you learn how to more effectively
> report bugs:
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html

No response after two months...
I assume it was a misunderstanding, not a bug, I've closed this issue.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.