From unknown Wed Jun 25 10:45:07 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#8695 <8695@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#8695 <8695@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: I have error on date (+8 m) and i Reply-To: bug#8695 <8695@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:45:07 +0000 retitle 8695 I have error on date (+8 m) and i=20 reassign 8695 coreutils submitter 8695 root severity 8695 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 18 14:18:40 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2011 18:18:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QMlKS-0008Tj-FO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:18:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QMlDZ-0008IL-Rb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:11:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMlDT-0008UD-Ih for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:11:28 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:55682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMlDT-0008U5-Gl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:11:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43927) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMlDS-0001CO-P5 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:11:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMlDR-0008Ti-Vq for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:11:26 -0400 Received: from [184.107.171.154] (port=31419 helo=host.magic-srv.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMlDR-0008TH-Q2 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:11:25 -0400 Received: from root by host.magic-srv.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QMjww-0007cs-HG for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:50:18 -0500 To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Subject: I have error on date (+8 m) and i Message-Id: From: root Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 11:50:18 -0500 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.magic-srv.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - host.magic-srv.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:18:39 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) do change it and not change give ok but when i review it give me +8 m so what the problem is ? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 18 14:40:32 2011 Received: (at 8695) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2011 18:40:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QMlfb-0000ct-Qn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:40:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QMlfZ-0000cc-0Z for 8695@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:40:30 -0400 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4IIeNV9012898 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 18 May 2011 14:40:23 -0400 Received: from [10.3.113.159] (ovpn-113-159.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.159]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4IIeMJY009625; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:40:23 -0400 Message-ID: <4DD41296.9080104@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 12:40:22 -0600 From: Eric Blake Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: root Subject: Re: bug#8695: I have error on date (+8 m) and i References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3397B3B7D8779056FE19D886" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.11 X-Spam-Score: -10.3 (----------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8695 Cc: 8695@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -10.3 (----------) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3397B3B7D8779056FE19D886 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable tags 8695 + moreinfo thanks On 05/18/2011 10:50 AM, root wrote: > do change it and not change give ok=20 > but when i review it give me +8 m > so what the problem is ?=20 Thanks for the report. However, I cannot decipher what you are asking. Possibly you are tripping up on a FAQ? http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/#The-date-command-is-not-workin= g-right_002e Please demonstrate what you typed, what 'date' actually output, and what you were expecting 'date' to output. Also, knowing your timezone might be relevant. You might have better success if you learn how to more effectively report bugs: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html --=20 Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --------------enig3397B3B7D8779056FE19D886 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJN1BKWAAoJEKeha0olJ0Nq2jMH/1jBGpS6J+88SIw2h9XiYSFG fj7dhGlMKMMAjnD7pZXOtxifTw1JGGuvJ9j6RBT97OkwkHsGtFbBVeFYrMhsV6nN 1jIjVuq7V52yKLYZOYDBziBO/xbhkN5VLIaXKMRPh4bixq9nHXsmv/+0MfbxocCz IDk/yBqvVBSfl/a8qg5ij3o9CXd+K+ZeWbt+MH6RfrdSrpzu1GAh6augZ4rBnrJk eqTOmW3+//PTaI/L903kGtb/bHNZ544TxRVaZgCdcHQQgHcfEOdFN++LAaOpmGIN OX5Te+9LGHq63B1rohkMviNKYHe41lXgaEcwT/w2avh0OUC1/r95AgAWjt6pBaA= =WEpO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3397B3B7D8779056FE19D886-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 24 10:37:32 2011 Received: (at 8695-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jul 2011 14:37:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QkzoC-0007Vr-DF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 10:37:32 -0400 Received: from mx.meyering.net ([82.230.74.64]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qkzo1-0007VR-MN for 8695-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 10:37:25 -0400 Received: from rho.meyering.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rho.meyering.net (Acme Bit-Twister) with ESMTP id C27506003D; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:37:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Jim Meyering To: Eric Blake Subject: Re: bug#8695: I have error on date (+8 m) and i In-Reply-To: <4DD41296.9080104@redhat.com> (Eric Blake's message of "Wed, 18 May 2011 12:40:22 -0600") References: <4DD41296.9080104@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:37:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87pqkz923o.fsf@rho.meyering.net> Lines: 25 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8695-done Cc: root , 8695-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) Eric Blake wrote: > tags 8695 + moreinfo > thanks > > On 05/18/2011 10:50 AM, root wrote: >> do change it and not change give ok >> but when i review it give me +8 m >> so what the problem is ? > > Thanks for the report. However, I cannot decipher what you are asking. > > Possibly you are tripping up on a FAQ? > http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/#The-date-command-is-not-working-right_002e > > Please demonstrate what you typed, what 'date' actually output, and what > you were expecting 'date' to output. Also, knowing your timezone might > be relevant. > > You might have better success if you learn how to more effectively > report bugs: > http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html No response after two months... I assume it was a misunderstanding, not a bug, I've closed this issue. From unknown Wed Jun 25 10:45:07 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator