GNU bug report logs - #869
Bug in handling invisible text, and bug in Pmail.

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: pmr <at> pajato.com

Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 08:25:05 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: wontfix

Merged with 846

Done: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #5 received at submit <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Paul Michael Reilly <pmr <at> pajato.com>
To: rms <at> gnu.org
Cc: emacs-pretest-bug <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bug in handling invisible text, and bug in Pmail.
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 04:15:33 -0400
"Richard M. Stallman" <rms <at> gnu.org> writes:

 > I think it is also a bug in Pmail.  Pmail should set the buffer boundaries
 > after that text, rather than making it invisible.

I don't think it is that simple because "that text" is simply part of
the collection of headers, some of which have been specified to be
invisible as Emacs displays the message, i.e. the X-Coding-System:
header can, according to rfc2822, precede or follow the Date: header.
This, if I understand the issue and your desires properly, makes
setting the buffer boundaries a non-workable solution.  I don't know
what the right solution is yet.  Worst case, the issue is an
indictment of using invisible text to hide the headers.  Yuck.

-pmr


 > If Pmail is fixed, then it won't trigger the invisible text bug.
 > But I think it needs to be fixed anyway.
 > 
 > 
 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 > >From Brand <at> xyzxysxysbb.com  Fri Aug 22 01:11:22 2008
 > X-Coding-System: undecided-unix
 > Return-path: <Brand <at> xyzxysxysbb.com>
 > Envelope-to: rms <at> gnu.org
 > Delivery-date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:11:22 -0400
 > Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:43206)
 > 	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67)
 > 	(envelope-from <Brand <at> xyzxysxysbb.com>)
 > 	id 1KWOvi-0001Cl-Jw
 > 	for rms <at> gnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:11:22 -0400
 > Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60)
 > 	(envelope-from <Brand <at> xyzxysxysbb.com>)
 > 	id 1KWOwz-0000Ti-Nv
 > 	for rms <at> gnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:12:44 -0400
 > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on monty-python
 > X-Spam-Level: 
 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
 > 	FORGED_RCVD_HELO,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=3.1.0
 > Received: from sh.day.org ([198.102.73.65]:47087)
 > 	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
 > 	(envelope-from <Brand <at> xyzxysxysbb.com>)
 > 	id 1KWOwz-0000T4-E6
 > 	for rms <at> gnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:12:41 -0400
 > X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e
 > Received: from vree.xyzxysxysbb.com (sh.day.org [198.102.73.65])
 > 	by sh.day.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18A9EC6988A39
 > 	for <rms <at> gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
 > Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 > 	by vree.xyzxysxysbb.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m7M1kbEs004491
 > 	for <rms <at> gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:46:46 -0700
 > Message-Id: <200808220146.m7M1kbEs004491 <at> vree.xyzxysxysbb.com>
 > To: rms <at> gnu.org
 > Subject: sorry that I was distracted with phone calls 
 > From: Brand <at> xyzxysxysbb.com
 > Reply-to: brand <at> xyzxysxysbb.com
 > Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:46:37 -0700
 > X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized.
 > X-BABYL-V6-ATTRIBUTES: A------
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > Two other ideas to run past you when time permits.
 > 
 > /w




This bug report was last modified 13 years and 299 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.