GNU bug report logs -
#8686
24.0.50; `re-search-backward' does not respect `search-invisible'
Previous Next
Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 22:10:03 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: notabug
Found in version 24.0.50
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:
> My impression is that `re-search-backward' and `*-forward' do not
> respect `search-invisible'. This makes it difficult if not impossible
> to use them in code to not find matches in hidden text. Why would this
> variable be respected only in the Isearch Lisp code? What am I missing?
Well, `search-invisible' is documented as only applying to interactive
searches:
----
search-invisible is a variable defined in ‘isearch.el’.
Its value is ‘open’
Documentation:
If t incremental search/query-replace can match hidden text.
A nil value means don’t match invisible text.
----
If you want code not to match invisible text, you have to make your code
check for the visibility. Closing.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
This bug report was last modified 9 years and 23 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.