Subject: bug#8676: ls --si --human-readable, MB vs M

From: Paul Eggert <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 09:23:23 -0700

On 05/16/11 01:48, Peggy Russell wrote:
> Shouldn't the `ls -l --si` output (#2 or #4) be display as 60MB vs 60M

That would be more consistent, yes.  But it would also take up an extra
column of output, and those columns are precious.