From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:03:56 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#8651 <8651@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#8651 <8651@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: `raise' properties on NextStep Reply-To: bug#8651 <8651@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 06:03:56 +0000 retitle 8651 `raise' properties on NextStep reassign 8651 emacs,ns submitter 8651 Alp Aker severity 8651 important tag 8651 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 11 03:50:25 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2011 07:50:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QK4Bc-0000C8-PO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:50:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QK4Ba-0000Bt-6Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:50:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QK4BU-0000fh-3h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:50:16 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:55719) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QK4BU-0000fd-2C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:50:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41254) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QK4BT-0007Ea-59 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:50:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QK4BS-0000fF-2Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:50:15 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:55941) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QK4BR-0000f2-La for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:50:14 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QK4BI-0001Gb-QE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:50:05 +0200 Received: from pool-71-182-163-252.pitbpa.east.verizon.net ([71.182.163.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:50:04 +0200 Received: from aker by pool-71-182-163-252.pitbpa.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:50:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org From: Alp Aker Subject: =?utf-8?b?YHJhaXNlJw==?= properties on NextStep Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 18:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 40 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 71.182.163.252 (Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_5; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/10.0.648.205 Safari/534.16) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) Yesterday it came up on a thread on the devel list that on NextStep the `raise' property increases line height but does nothing more; it doesn't alter the vertical positioning of characters. The question then arose whether this was a bug on NextStep, since the implementation of display properties isn't OS-specific. Some hasty investigation appears to show that the problem is actually in the implementation of the glyph-drawing routines for NextStep. Make the following change to the trunk: === modified file 'src/nsfont.m' --- src/nsfont.m 2011-04-16 03:14:08 +0000 +++ src/nsfont.m 2011-05-10 17:13:25 +0000 @@ -1273,6 +1273,8 @@ else [col set]; + r.origin.y = s->ybase; + CGContextSetTextPosition (gcontext, r.origin.x, r.origin.y); CGContextShowGlyphsWithAdvances (gcontext, s->char2b + s->cmp_from, advances, len); and build with `./configure --with-ns'. The result is an executable in which `raise' properties have the documented behavior. The above change is naive, and will break other things (such as underline positioning), but it serves as a proof of concept that the issue is on Emacs's side. As far as I can see, the problem is this (please correct me if I've misunderstood the display routine, which is likely). Changes in vertical character position that result from display properties are processed in xdisp.c, and those changes are reflected in the value of the ybase field. But many of the gylph-drawing functions in nsterm.m and nsfont.m only check the y field to determine the vertical position of a glyph; they don't use ybase at all. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 11 09:08:47 2011 Received: (at 8651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2011 13:08:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QK99j-0008Iu-Ii for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:08:47 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QK99h-0008Ii-Iy for 8651@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:08:46 -0400 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QK99b-0007bP-7Q; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:08:39 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 09:08:39 -0400 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Alp Aker In-reply-to: (message from Alp Aker on Tue, 10 May 2011 18:14:31 +0000 (UTC)) Subject: Re: bug#8651: `raise' properties on NextStep References: X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8651 Cc: 8651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) > From: Alp Aker > Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 18:14:31 +0000 (UTC) > > Yesterday it came up on a thread on the devel list that on > NextStep the `raise' property increases line height but does > nothing more; it doesn't alter the vertical positioning of > characters. The question then arose whether this was a bug on > NextStep, since the implementation of display properties isn't > OS-specific. This is a misunderstanding. I never said that the problem is outside Emacs. I said that it's probably in the NS-specific parts of Emacs. Most of the work of handling the `raise' property is in device-independent code in xdisp.c. However, the terminal-specific code should obey the computed metrics of the glyphs when it draws the glyphs on the screen. It looks like NS-specific display code doesn't, while both xterm.c and w32term.c do, see x_draw_glyph_string_foreground. > The above change is naive, and will break other things (such as > underline positioning), but it serves as a proof of concept that > the issue is on Emacs's side. Of course, it's on the Emacs side! Where else could it possibly be? It would be silly to claim that NextStep as a system cannot draw characters at pixel resolution. > many of the > gylph-drawing functions in nsterm.m and nsfont.m only check the y field > to determine the vertical position of a glyph; they don't use ybase > at all. Which constitutes an NS-specific bug in Emacs. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 11 10:44:29 2011 Received: (at 8651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2011 14:44:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKAeL-00022L-CQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:44:29 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKAeJ-000229-Dz for 8651@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:44:28 -0400 Received: from 213-159-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.159.213]:55671 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKAeD-0006G9-Hz; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:44:22 -0400 Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5500966152; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:44:18 -0300 (ART) From: Stefan Monnier To: Alp Aker Subject: Re: bug#8651: `raise' properties on NextStep Message-ID: References: Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:44:18 -0300 In-Reply-To: (Alp Aker's message of "Tue, 10 May 2011 18:14:31 +0000 (UTC)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8651 Cc: 8651@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) > As far as I can see, the problem is this (please correct me if > I've misunderstood the display routine, which is > likely). Changes in vertical character position that result from > display properties are processed in xdisp.c, and those changes > are reflected in the value of the ybase field. But many of the > gylph-drawing functions in nsterm.m and nsfont.m only check the y field > to determine the vertical position of a glyph; they don't use ybase > at all. Thanks for the bug report and diagnostic, which sounds just right. Hopefully someone familiar with the NS code will find the time to write an actual patch for it. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 11 17:55:40 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2011 21:55:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKHNb-0004Ue-HJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:55:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKHNZ-0004UK-S0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:55:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKHNU-0002JW-2d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:55:32 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:41860) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKHNU-0002JS-1E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:55:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35215) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKHNT-00056V-6M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:55:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKHNO-0002IQ-7X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:55:31 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:33247) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKHNN-0002ID-VO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:55:26 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKHNL-0002wV-LB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:55:24 +0200 Received: from pool-74-111-168-80.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net ([74.111.168.80]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:55:23 +0200 Received: from aker by pool-74-111-168-80.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:55:23 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org From: Alp Aker Subject: Re: bug#8651: =?utf-8?b?YHJhaXNlJw==?= properties on NextStep Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:55:12 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 74.111.168.80 (Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_5; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/10.0.648.205 Safari/534.16) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) > This is a misunderstanding. I never said that the problem is outside > Emacs. I said that it's probably in the NS-specific parts of Emacs. Well, you did say "Maybe it's a bug in NextStep, then" :) But sorry to have misinterpreted you. In any case, I just wanted to make sure the bug was in the database. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 22 14:21:37 2011 Received: (at 8651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2011 18:21:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QZS3U-0006og-Gf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:21:37 -0400 Received: from exprod7og121.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.20]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QZS3O-0006oH-Mc for 8651@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:21:35 -0400 Received: from mb2i1.ns.pitt.edu ([136.142.11.153]) by exprod7ob121.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTgIypJ3nw3Sm0KeCmgcfTalZticOUE+N@postini.com; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:21:30 PDT Received: from unixs1.cis.pitt.edu ([136.142.4.246]) by pitt.edu (PMDF V6.3-x11 #31505) with ESMTP id <0LN700G4UEZOIB@mb2i1.ns.pitt.edu> for 8651@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:21:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:21:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Alp Aker Subject: Re: bug#8651: `raise' properties on NextStep X-X-Sender: aker@unixs1.cis.pitt.edu To: 8651@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, eliz@gnu.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8651 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) Stefan Monnier writes: > Thanks for the bug report and diagnostic, which sounds just right. > Hopefully someone familiar with the NS code will find the time to write > an actual patch for it. I studied the NS code some and wrote up a patch. I posted it in the thread for bug 8913, as that concerns the same issue and was opened yesterday. (I'm noting the connection here to make sure this bug also gets closed if the patch is accepted.) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 25 09:03:27 2011 Received: (at 8651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2011 13:03:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QaSWE-0000da-G8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:03:26 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QaSWC-0000dH-Lg; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:03:25 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAAHcBU5MCqDH/2dsb2JhbABTEKc3eIh0wXCGMASeEYNWUw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,424,1304308800"; d="scan'208";a="117112910" Received: from 76-10-160-199.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.160.199]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 25 Jun 2011 09:03:18 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9666A58FD6; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:03:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Alp Aker Subject: Re: bug#8651: `raise' properties on NextStep Message-ID: References: Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:03:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Alp Aker's message of "Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:21:24 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8651 Cc: 8651@debbugs.gnu.org, Adrian Robert , eliz@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) forcemerge 8651 8913 thanks >> Thanks for the bug report and diagnostic, which sounds just >> right. Hopefully someone familiar with the NS code will find the time to >> write an actual patch for it. > I studied the NS code some and wrote up a patch. I posted it in the thread > for bug 8913, as that concerns the same issue and was opened yesterday. > (I'm noting the connection here to make sure this bug also gets closed if > the patch is accepted.) Thank you very much, could some NS guy confirm it's right and install it? Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 04 14:38:54 2011 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jul 2011 18:38:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qdo2o-0002je-Kq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 14:38:54 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qdo2m-0002jR-AE for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 14:38:52 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtwHABYIEk5FxIxr/2dsb2JhbABTmQmOcniIc8EfhjYEnlyELA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,474,1304308800"; d="scan'208";a="120404467" Received: from 69-196-140-107.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.140.107]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 04 Jul 2011 14:38:46 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7FB9D58DBA; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 14:38:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#8913: 23.2; Raise display property does not work correctly on Mac OS X Message-ID: References: <725BC722-0742-4A78-BAD0-B916E3B9FF78@ed.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 14:38:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 04 Jul 2011 13:47:27 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) tags 8913 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 08 22:52:56 2011 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2011 02:52:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfNf5-0006vh-6A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 22:52:55 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfNf2-0006vR-SV for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 22:52:53 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgYHAD7BF05MCqt8/2dsb2JhbABTmFyOcXiIdMAAhjgEnweELw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,502,1304308800"; d="scan'208";a="123910394" Received: from 76-10-171-124.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([76.10.171.124]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 08 Jul 2011 22:52:46 -0400 Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B683E660D5; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 22:52:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#8651: `raise' properties on NextStep Message-ID: References: Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 22:52:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Alp Aker's message of "Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:21:24 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) severity 8651 important severity 8863 important severity 8680 important tags 8680 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 28 14:50:57 2011 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jul 2011 18:50:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QmVfc-0004lS-NE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:50:57 -0400 Received: from vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.147]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QmVfa-0004lL-NE for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:50:55 -0400 Received: from furball ([128.36.14.95]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6SIor0L015576 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:50:53 -0400 From: Chong Yidong To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: close 8913 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:50:53 -0400 Message-ID: <87sjpqdysy.fsf@stupidchicken.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.147 X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) close 8913 thanks From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:03:56 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator