GNU bug report logs - #8492
23.3; Time to use a different binding for completion?

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman <at> gmail.com>
Cc: rrt <at> sc3d.org, 8492 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, david <at> harpegolden.net
Subject: bug#8492: 23.3; Time to use a different binding for completion?
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:43:43 +0300

> From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:03:10 +0200
> Cc: David De La Harpe Golden <david <at> harpegolden.net>, 8492 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rrt <at> sc3d.org
> 
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> >> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:41:41 +0100
> >> From: David De La Harpe Golden <david <at> harpegolden.net>
> >> Cc: 8492 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
> >>
> >> Uh, but then given w32 emacs apparently sees "lwindow"/"rwindow" instead
> >> of "super" when you press the windows keys (testing in wine not real
> >> windows), w32 emacs may also need to be adjusted to map them to
> >> left/right super by default and treat them as modifiers.
> >
> > See w32-lwindow-modifier and w32-rwindow-modifier.  (And note the
> > footnote in the Emacs manual's "Windows Keyboard" node about the
> > caveats.)
> 
> Which are not guaranteed to work unless you use a low level keyboard
> hook. See EmacsW32 repository for a path with this.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, and we must destroy Carthage, too.

(The part in parentheses in my message exactly referred to the caveats
of using these two keys.)

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.