From rms@gnu.org Sun Aug 31 23:13:12 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD, MDO_DATING14,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 1 Sep 2008 06:13:12 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m816D8kF002338 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 23:13:09 -0700 Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Ka2dR-0005GU-3j; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:11:33 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 From: "Richard M. Stallman" To: pmr@pajato.com, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org Subject: Bug in handling invisible text, and bug in Pmail. Reply-to: rms@gnu.org Message-Id: Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:11:33 -0400 In Pmail I had a message that looked like this (I changed his host name for privacy's sake): ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To: rms@gnu.org Subject: sorry that I was distracted with phone calls From: Brand@xyzxysxysbb.com Reply-to: brand@xyzxysxysbb.com Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:46:37 -0700 X-BABYL-V6-ATTRIBUTES: A------ Two other ideas to run past you when time permits. /w ---------------------------------------------------------------------- and I wanted to copy that into an outgoing message. So I typed C-x h M-w, went to *mail* and inserted it. What this inserted appears below. It was quite a surprise. It seems there is a lot of invisible text at the beginning of the buffer, and two different values of point display at the same place on the screen. These places are 934995 and 9351405. (point-min) returns 934995, and that's where M-< moves point to. Typing C-f C-b moves point to 9351405. I gather that those two positions surround the invisible text. I think this is a bug in the command loop's handling of invisible text -- it should not be the case that C-f C-b changes point. I think it is also a bug in Pmail. Pmail should set the buffer boundaries after that text, rather than making it invisible. If Pmail is fixed, then it won't trigger the invisible text bug. But I think it needs to be fixed anyway. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >From Brand@xyzxysxysbb.com Fri Aug 22 01:11:22 2008 X-Coding-System: undecided-unix Return-path: Envelope-to: rms@gnu.org Delivery-date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:11:22 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:43206) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KWOvi-0001Cl-Jw for rms@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:11:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KWOwz-0000Ti-Nv for rms@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:12:44 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on monty-python X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=3.1.0 Received: from sh.day.org ([198.102.73.65]:47087) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KWOwz-0000T4-E6 for rms@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:12:41 -0400 X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e Received: from vree.xyzxysxysbb.com (sh.day.org [198.102.73.65]) by sh.day.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18A9EC6988A39 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:12:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vree.xyzxysxysbb.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m7M1kbEs004491 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:46:46 -0700 Message-Id: <200808220146.m7M1kbEs004491@vree.xyzxysxysbb.com> To: rms@gnu.org Subject: sorry that I was distracted with phone calls From: Brand@xyzxysxysbb.com Reply-to: brand@xyzxysxysbb.com Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:46:37 -0700 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BABYL-V6-ATTRIBUTES: A------ Two other ideas to run past you when time permits. /w ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From cyd@stupidchicken.com Mon Sep 1 11:09:57 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 846) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 1 Sep 2008 18:09:57 +0000 Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m81I9s6G019124 for <846@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 11:09:55 -0700 Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C467D57E337; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 14:12:10 -0400 (EDT) To: rms@gnu.org Cc: 846@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: Bug in C-n From: Chong Yidong Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:12:10 -0400 Message-ID: <87ljybg2h1.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I can't reproduce this. However, I fixed a similar bug a couple of days ago; could you try to reproduce this problem with the latest sources? From monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Mon Sep 1 13:37:52 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 1 Sep 2008 20:37:52 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m81KbmB0004969 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 13:37:50 -0700 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:33332) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KaG8B-0002SP-Ub for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:36:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KaG9g-0008NY-18 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:37:47 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:56639 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KaG9f-0008NO-If; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:37:43 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMFAADwu0hFxJrH/2dsb2JhbACBZbFDgWmBBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,309,1217822400"; d="scan'208";a="26195499" Received: from 69-196-154-199.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.154.199]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2008 16:37:40 -0400 Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8E023B41E3; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 16:37:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: rms@gnu.org Cc: 846@debbugs.gnu.org, pmr@pajato.com, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#846: Bug in handling invisible text, and bug in Pmail. Message-ID: References: Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:37:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Richard M. Stallman's message of "Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:11:33 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 > I think this is a bug in the command loop's handling of invisible > text -- it should not be the case that C-f C-b changes point. There are various desirable behaviors w.r.t invisible text, and you can't have them all at the same time. I.e. the above "bug" is a conscious decision. It's been with us for a while now and hasn't caused any real bug report yet (other than reports such as this one, that is; which complain on principle rather than because of some real problem introduced by this behavior). So I'd rather leave it as is. Now as for the Pmail-specific part of your bug-report, I can't help you right now. Is this different from Rmail's behavior? Stefan From rms@gnu.org Mon Sep 1 18:11:36 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 2 Sep 2008 01:11:36 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m821BWuE002022 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 18:11:33 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KaKQe-0007BJ-3C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:11:32 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KaKQc-00079o-I4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:11:30 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55852 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KaKQc-00079V-C6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:11:30 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:60226) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KaKQc-0002O1-52 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:11:30 -0400 Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KaKP3-0004hI-Sh; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:09:53 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 From: "Richard M. Stallman" To: Stefan Monnier , 846@debbugs.gnu.org CC: pmr@pajato.com, 846@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:37:39 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#846: Bug in handling invisible text, and bug in Pmail. Reply-to: rms@gnu.org References: Message-Id: Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:09:53 -0400 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) > I think this is a bug in the command loop's handling of invisible > text -- it should not be the case that C-f C-b changes point. There are various desirable behaviors w.r.t invisible text, and you can't have them all at the same time. I know that better than anyone, and I thought about this a long time. The command loop used to have code to make sure that there weren't two different possible point values that would display as the same place. It's been with us for a while now Did you change my decision? If so, when did that happen? and hasn't caused any real bug report yet (other than reports such as this one, that is; which complain on principle rather than because of some real problem It was a real problem, even though Pmail should not use invisible text for this. It led to confusing behavior in this case, and it will be confusing in every case where invisible text is used. If people have not complained, maybe it is because the use of invisible text is rare. What other modes use invisible text? From monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Mon Sep 1 19:36:55 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FOURLA, HAS_BUG_NUMBER,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 2 Sep 2008 02:36:56 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m822anh1030853 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 19:36:53 -0700 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:58101) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KaLjd-00086D-06 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:35:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KaLl7-0005ML-Pj for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:36:49 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:59818) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KaLl7-0005MF-I3; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:36:45 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuYEADNDvEhFxJrH/2dsb2JhbACBZbETgWmBBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,312,1217822400"; d="scan'208";a="26207152" Received: from 69-196-154-199.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.154.199]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2008 22:36:43 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 646AF7FF1; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 22:36:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: rms@gnu.org Cc: 846@debbugs.gnu.org, pmr@pajato.com, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#846: Bug in handling invisible text, and bug in Pmail. Message-ID: References: Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:36:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Richard M. Stallman's message of "Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:09:53 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 >> I think this is a bug in the command loop's handling of invisible >> text -- it should not be the case that C-f C-b changes point. > There are various desirable behaviors w.r.t invisible text, and you > can't have them all at the same time. > I know that better than anyone, and I thought about this a long time. > The command loop used to have code to make sure that there weren't > two different possible point values that would display as the same place. When was that? How did it do that? > It's been with us for a while now > Did you change my decision? What decision? > If so, when did that happen? The relevant piece of code is adjust_point_for_property, which used to make point move over images and char-compositions and which I extended in Emacs-22 (IIRC) to move over invisible text as well (making it automatically somewhat-intangible). > and hasn't caused any real bug report > yet (other than reports such as this one, that is; which complain on > principle rather than because of some real problem > It was a real problem, even though Pmail should not use invisible text > for this. It led to confusing behavior in this case, and it will be > confusing in every case where invisible text is used. Could you re-explain the problem you encountered, then? Re-reading your original bug-report I still can't see where this difference between point before and after C-f C-b introduced a problem. > If people have not complained, maybe it is because the use of > invisible text is rare. What other modes use invisible text? Indeed, most complaints around invisible text have to do with the invisibility itself rather than details of how point is handed in its presence. So invisible text is rare because it's inherently problematic (and should hence be avoided whenever possible). Stefan From rgm@gnu.org Wed Sep 3 09:02:25 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_SUBJECT, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8,NOSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,VALID_BTS_CONTROL, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at control) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 3 Sep 2008 16:02:25 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m83G2IEW007479 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:02:19 -0700 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Kaumd-00057L-Pq; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:00:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18622.46247.726360.238974@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 12:00:39 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: control X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: white X-Ran: S-d!7I*Y_(CI,6)z~NW0p971xvA';jG~n+{6sgB!1W8~yuPgDf-/K,n)%R>n; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:48:29 -0700 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:49128) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KiEm7-00005U-8r for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:46:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KiEo6-0000oM-At for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:48:27 -0400 Received: from mail.uni-ulm.de ([134.60.1.11]:47338) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KiEo0-0000iV-GM; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:48:21 -0400 Received: from bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.41.37]) by mail.uni-ulm.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m8NKm85i009134; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:48:08 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF73131B1; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:48:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Reiner Steib To: Stefan Monnier Cc: 846@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, pmr@pajato.com, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#846: Bug in handling invisible text, and bug in Pmail. References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-Face: P05mdcZT&lL[-s2=mw~RsllZ0zZAb?vdE}.s Cancel-Lock: sha1:qziQAuJi1nSoqLQGf+8ywJgruEU= Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:44:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:36:44 -0400") Message-ID: <87iqsmsibi.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-DCC--Metrics: poseidon 1113; Body=6 Fuz1=6 Fuz2=6 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 On Tue, Sep 02 2008, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> If people have not complained, maybe it is because the use of >> invisible text is rare. What other modes use invisible text? > > Indeed, most complaints around invisible text have to do with the > invisibility itself rather than details of how point is handed in > its presence. So invisible text is rare because it's inherently > problematic (and should hence be avoided whenever possible). Gnus message mode used invisible text to hide headers while composing a news/mail message. But it was changed to use narrowing instead: ,----[ gnus/ChangeLog ] | 2004-11-22 Romain Francoise | | * message.el (message-header-format-alist): Add `From' in list | so that it can be sorted. | (message-fix-before-sending): Widen and sort headers before | sending. | (message-hide-headers): Use narrowing to hide headers by moving | them to the top of the buffer and narrowing to the region | underneath. `---- Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/ From rgm@gnu.org Wed Feb 25 19:57:27 2009 Received: (at control) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 26 Feb 2009 03:57:27 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1Q3vL63009075 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:57:23 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LcXKz-00072r-09; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:55:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18854.4760.940911.972299@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:55:04 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: control Subject: control message reassign 686 emacs,w32 reassign 1780 emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com severity 2473 wishlist reassign 2468 spam reassign 2469 spam reassign 2471 spam severity 2474 wishlist severity 973 wishlist tags 846 wontfix reassign 1131 emacs,ns severity 1226 minor severity 1253 minor severity 1339 minor tags 1339 moreinfo severity 1474 wishlist severity 1582 minor severity 1646 minor tags 1753 moreinfo reassign 2475 spam From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 27 20:28:19 2011 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jul 2011 00:28:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QmESZ-0000eR-Be for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:28:19 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QmESY-0000eL-2S for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:28:18 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QmESS-0008Dr-7j for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 02:28:12 +0200 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 02:27:59 +0200 Message-Id: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #846 X-MailScanner-ID: 1QmESS-0008Dr-7j X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1312417692.41783@85Y5+6mGLtszn3HNVeHiMg X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) close 846 From unknown Sat Aug 09 01:08:05 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator