From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 02 21:05:10 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2011 01:05:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6Bkb-0007IU-Nh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 21:05:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6BkZ-0007ID-V2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 21:05:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6BkP-00021x-RU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 21:05:02 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:43458) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6BkP-00021t-LB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 21:04:57 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36224 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q6BkK-0003xG-Lw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 21:04:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6BkF-00020f-SN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 21:04:52 -0400 Received: from caiajhbdcahe.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.74]:60701 helo=homiemail-a4.g.dreamhost.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6BkF-00020O-Lj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 21:04:47 -0400 Received: from homiemail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F2951C07E; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 18:04:44 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:cc:subject :references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s= jidanni.org; b=Anpf53FWayu6goDlLiCEky8VUGTg6x2kWqEEJ7D/069RDDsry XMCg+z3QW/5bPtT1wDAZuqoOnFdHfaq/2yK9c4sIqhhukM0J+qCjD2oxK14xYv+F JDS/+xOI7kx9pRU3SHX+lOKvhgn6EP2hHDeW3JF1LGgq4yPmZdeqYrMILE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=jidanni.org; bh=NQ5mN175LUoRKJUtx/bkEapM4ow=; b=IvXsjTX8aSCVS Y1pMsWGD7M5jEF+QBBV5HQJGhqeQ5CFwBtJEHm8e7BEiAozBo9o+AoTY7xFXpPMP OsImgEbcGNT2vDpSzE0B+xcDdwH3dWBlXdNWLdnhsNqEUz3q3qmTUjPy15Ftazd2 akNwrgbeaqURzaqAY3Tod2004TRJKY= Received: from jidanni.org (218-163-1-143.dynamic.hinet.net [218.163.1.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by homiemail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD55751C05F; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 18:04:43 -0700 (PDT) From: jidanni@jidanni.org To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: describe-bindings does not list text properties and overlay bindings! References: Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 09:04:40 +0800 Message-ID: <877hbctaaf.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 199.232.76.165 X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: ding@gnus.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) Dear Emacs Professionals/Nurds, Since back in the 1980's I've depended on C-h b to tell me what all the keys are currently bound to in the buffer I'm in. I even printed them out on paper and studied them all. C-h b runs the command describe-bindings, which is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `help.el'. Show a list of all defined keys, and their definitions. We put that list in a buffer, and display the buffer. So you can understand my shock upon finding out, >>>>> "LMI" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: LMI> jidanni@jidanni.org writes: >> Why when in the article buffer C-h k { says >> } runs the command w3m-next-image, which is an interactive compiled >> but C-h b does not list it? LMI> `C-h b' just lists the keys in the current mode(s) of the buffer. It LMI> doesn't list the keys that are bound due to text properties and LMI> overlays. It probably should, and that's an Emacs bug. OK, I'll hereby report it. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 21 17:06:17 2019 Received: (at 8414) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2019 21:06:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36643 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Xnu-0003O1-FM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 17:06:17 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:43356) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Xnd-0003NA-5Q for 8414@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 17:06:00 -0400 Received: from 77.16.217.167.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.16.217.167] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i0XnY-0006Tw-1p; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 23:05:42 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: jidanni@jidanni.org Subject: Re: bug#8414: describe-bindings does not list text properties and overlay bindings! References: <877hbctaaf.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:05:36 -0700 In-Reply-To: <877hbctaaf.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> (jidanni@jidanni.org's message of "Sun, 03 Apr 2011 09:04:40 +0800") Message-ID: <87sgpuw7of.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: jidanni@jidanni.org writes: > Since back in the 1980's I've depended on C-h b to tell me what all the > keys are currently bound to in the buffer I'm in. > > I even printed them out on paper and studied them all. > > C-h b runs [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8414 Cc: 8414@debbugs.gnu.org, ding@gnus.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) jidanni@jidanni.org writes: > Since back in the 1980's I've depended on C-h b to tell me what all the > keys are currently bound to in the buffer I'm in. > > I even printed them out on paper and studied them all. > > C-h b runs the command describe-bindings, which is an interactive > compiled Lisp function in `help.el'. > > Show a list of all defined keys, and their definitions. > We put that list in a buffer, and display the buffer. (I'm going through old bug reports that have unfortunately gotten no attention yet.) I had a peek at this now -- I hit `C-h b' on text that has a `keymap' property, and it looks like it's been fixed in the intervening years: `keymap' Property Bindings: key binding --- ------- TAB shr-next-link RET eww-follow-link ESC Prefix Command + image-increase-size - image-decrease-size So I'm closing this bug report. If you're still seeing this, please reopen. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 21 17:06:33 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2019 21:06:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36645 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i0XoA-0003Ou-KI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 17:06:33 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:43384) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Xno-0003Nf-4C for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 17:06:11 -0400 Received: from 77.16.217.167.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.16.217.167] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Xnk-0006U4-6y for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 23:05:54 +0200 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:05:49 -0700 Message-Id: <87r25ew7o2.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #8414 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 8414 fixed close 8414 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 8414 fixed close 8414 quit From unknown Sun Jun 22 17:16:52 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator