GNU bug report logs - #8391
chmod setuid & setguid bits

Previous Next

Full log

Message #74 received at 8391 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
To: ovasik <at> redhat.com
Cc: chris <at> computersalat.de, Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>,
	8391 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#8391: chmod setuid & setguid bits
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:48:49 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 02/24/2012 12:33 PM, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
>> Sorry, I don't follow.  If I have a decimal mode 'mode' in a script,
>> then this:
>>
>>   chmod @$(printf %o $mode) DIR
>>
>> is easier and simpler than this:
>>
>>   chmod $(printf %5.5o $mode) DIR
>>
>> The "5.5o" is tricky: Why *two* "5"s?

By that argument, this is also equally simple:

chmod 0000$(printf %o $mode) DIR

>> and who can remember which "5" is really needed, and why,
>> right off the bat? and remember why "5", and not "4" or "6"?
>>
>> The "@" is simple.

s/@/0000/, and you have your distro-agnostic prefix.

> 
> Yes, but `chmod @755 DIR' approach will not let you to write a script
> which will work without modification on RHEL-4,RHEL-5 and RHEL-6
> machine... which is not the case with fully octal mode. That's what I'm
> trying to say with "you still have octal digit". This %5.5o was more
> about "easy" change to their script which will allow them to use one
> script on everything again...
> This kind of approach (one script for more systems) is very common in
> enterprise area - and without possibility of doing that, requester will
> not be fine with the solution.

And it's arguments like that why I still think multiple leading zeros is
better than any other prefix.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake <at> redhat.com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.