Subject: bug#8141: 23.2.94; python-fill-paragraph

From: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:18:08 -0500

>> No, the current definition is on purpose.

> IMHO that introduces complexity, even if there are reasons for.
> If modes introduce their own fill-function, it's better to leave them
> than. If the modes need some later stuff from fill.el, they may take it.

What complexity?  If the mode's fill function wants to do it all itself,
than it just needs to return a non-nil value.

        Stefan