GNU bug report logs - #8119
buggy 2011-02-14 trunk build on MS Windows

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 21:25:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 24.0.50

Done: Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #36 received at 8119 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: rgm <at> gnu.org, 8119 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:40:07 +0200

> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> Cc: <rgm <at> gnu.org>, <8119 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:27:20 -0800
> 
> > FWIW, I see no harm at all in retitling, and I do see a certain
> > value in having the title express the essence of the bug report.
> 
> And do you see such a policy as the general practice elsewhere?

On my daytime job, I frequently retitle bug reports, because many of
my co-workers don't know how to express themselves in English too
well.  I have yet to see anyone complain about that; all of the
correspondence about bugs quotes their numbers anyway.
This bug report was last modified 14 years and 149 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.