From unknown Tue Aug 19 02:52:11 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#8094 <8094@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#8094 <8094@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 23.2.94; Bug in delete-exited-processes Reply-To: bug#8094 <8094@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 09:52:11 +0000 retitle 8094 23.2.94; Bug in delete-exited-processes reassign 8094 emacs submitter 8094 Leo severity 8094 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 22 01:36:34 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2011 06:36:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PrlrO-0001aE-5K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 01:36:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PrlrM-0001a3-Sd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 01:36:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PrlrG-0006T3-To for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 01:36:27 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:44295) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PrlrG-0006Sm-Gq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 01:36:26 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53629 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PrlrB-0008IU-B5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 01:36:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Prlr9-0006Op-8s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 01:36:20 -0500 Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:33262) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Prlr9-0006Ol-5b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 01:36:19 -0500 Received: by iwl42 with SMTP id 42so3603947iwl.0 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:36:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=4NNXr21+739Ct0Z2Feg6V+Hy1ZUszzko4+bURUPs72M=; b=I1pajZerwy6rIBzwq2NOOnO/OYSU8M0jINBortZ9ST6R3RY0e1itOn6blilzPK8TSX QP2NLP7b4YzEyZ/VVz3cwJjBYGfBJqd02ja/LIRr+xY2sGSIeHgDnrIucxvwHeb+IaSk Vxf98So6ZkBlQnGFC9MfbfF0zcTWximXHsFtY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=nVvyGclnK33HSUjGgvxtjlcPcosm+sFuy8WYn3g/fGWclqb2a5hKGSbF2aUgqXXEII aouzsr0VmR/iS+Ia3+X3onBKVBvWHE35davZGr0/q+WM2luwxsJDa85sFCU1Voc2Da2D lnuUEYmdzvaZADO9U9LNE2mVfTVlHqFe+ng+g= Received: by 10.42.178.135 with SMTP id bm7mr3117786icb.101.1298356577124; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:36:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from Victoria.local ([117.28.20.51]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm5892367iba.10.2011.02.21.22.36.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:36:15 -0800 (PST) From: Leo To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 23.2.94; Bug in delete-exited-processes Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:36:00 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 199.232.76.165 X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) While looking at processs.c, I found that due to this change: Author: Kim F. Storm Date: Tue Oct 3 09:14:40 2006 +0000 (list_processes_1): Run sentinels before removing dead processes. Also remove `closed' network connections. list_processes_1 no longer calls remove_process directly and thus the meaning of nil for delete-exited-processes no longer means what it says it does. ,----[ (info "(elisp)Deleting Processes") ] | If it is | `nil', then they continue to exist until the user runs | `list-processes'. Otherwise, they are deleted immediately after | they exit. `---- For example, I set delete-exited-processes to nil and I can see in the list processes buffer: emms-player-simple-process<2> run (none) /dev/ttys002 mpg123 /Users/Shared/iTunes Music/cyl/abc.mp3 emms-player-simple-process<1> exit (none) /dev/ttys002 mpg123 /Users/Shared/iTunes Music/zjl/01.mp3 emms-player-simple-process exit (none) /dev/ttys002 mpg123 /Users/Shared/Music Videos/18.mp3 ............ In addition, if I set delete-exited-processes back to t, list-processes still don't remove processes with exit status. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 06 09:42:05 2012 Received: (at 8094) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2012 14:42:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56599 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuPlc-000566-ON for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:42:05 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:45993 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuPla-00055z-Jb for 8094@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:42:03 -0500 Received: from bb121-7-229-69.singnet.com.sg ([121.7.229.69]:58714 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuPkl-0000TI-M2; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:41:12 -0500 From: Chong Yidong To: Leo Subject: Re: bug#8094: 23.2.94; Bug in delete-exited-processes References: Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:41:03 +0800 In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:36:00 +0800") Message-ID: <87mx8w10u8.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8094 Cc: 8094@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) Leo writes: > list_processes_1 no longer calls remove_process directly and thus the > meaning of nil for delete-exited-processes no longer means what it says > it does. Fixed, thanks for the heads-up. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 06 09:42:15 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2012 14:42:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56602 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuPlm-00056Q-K0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:42:15 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:45995 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuPll-00056K-OE for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:42:14 -0500 Received: from bb121-7-229-69.singnet.com.sg ([121.7.229.69]:58715 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuPkw-0000TX-O1 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:41:23 -0500 From: Chong Yidong To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: close 8094 Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:41:15 +0800 Message-ID: <87ipjkuir8.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) close 8094 thanks From unknown Tue Aug 19 02:52:11 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator