From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 18 20:35:30 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2011 01:35:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PqbjN-0005fj-N7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:35:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PqbV0-0005LH-7y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:20:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqbUu-0002Mg-Fh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:20:33 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:60028) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqbUu-0002Mc-1b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:20:32 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37813 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PqbUp-00075q-Hz for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:20:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqbUo-0002M2-JY for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:20:27 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:52931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqbUo-0002Lx-Et for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:20:26 -0500 Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so4455526wwb.30 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:20:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ZJlUSEO3iCzY6ZGIn9RWlyyLyk2qcg+vtFZnY5aWUJk=; b=GNYv4cNYLMI/tHyOxrGbgauP4p2grpUyrLE2+oyQUcfwf4WK8Bj+F1KVnAjksXacsY VBSEYm480Mv6FWPSCNZxfxHqPShb0u9iaOOLk2YJ0suR8KOB14+b5/oEmxUJFRDnTGQ+ 440le374X/7xykD+S20BMPbBLmZqgH2PxfnEQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=DDYQq8uv2daJ3dtBkQBowN3hap6rajTmAkioDTPZYA4OAU6vWfTbJ59iX0P5EzLP+R /Qomr58sA+cfUjzo3GGoF++QTxfeyCo3Bzv24ruC4M/GSvpFsoErepR/trg0pxrrXoU+ LCDdSdvQy7zZKCcf+1YAoyfAQe2h6emtgZsz8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.144.200 with SMTP id a8mr1255763wbv.217.1298078424916; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:20:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.132.85 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:20:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 03:20:24 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: rm command problem/suggestion From: Luca Daniel To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367fb68168649f049c986f07 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 199.232.76.165 X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:35:28 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) --0016367fb68168649f049c986f07 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi there :-) I have o problem and an suggestion : 1) The problem: I can't find an easy way to remove a type of file through all sub-directories with GNU tool "rm" (remove). There is not an option to search through all sub-folders , only in the current working directory. Back when I used windows this was easy with the command : del /s *.pdf . 2) The suggestion : please make an option for the "rm" command to look in sub-directories so it can be easier to use and increase functionality . I asked some people about this problem I have and the answer I got was not pretty in the sense that it was not a pretty command =) . I can't remember what is was because it was complicated (mixed with locate or find) and this is the problem ... it should be simple . So please give this a thought :) . I am an exclusive GNU/Linux user and all I miss from windoze is the simplicity of a simple command or switch . I found this e-mail in the man pages so I hope a don't bother anyone with my message as for this is not a bug, only a feature that I wish to see implemented sometime in the future. If there is a way to do it with only "rm" or a simple command and I missed it please reply , I would be grateful . Thank you. Luca Daniel. --0016367fb68168649f049c986f07 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi there :-)
I have o problem and an suggestion :
1) The problem: I= can't find an easy way to remove a type of file through all sub-direct= ories with GNU tool "rm" (remove). There is not an option to sear= ch through all sub-folders , only in the current working directory. Back wh= en I used windows this was easy with the command : del /s *.pdf=A0=A0 . 2) The suggestion : please make an option for the "rm" command to= look in sub-directories so it can be easier to use and increase functional= ity .
I asked some people about this problem I have and the answer I got= was not pretty in the sense that it was not a pretty command=A0 =3D)=A0 . = I can't remember what is was because it was complicated (mixed with loc= ate or find) and this is the problem ... it should be simple . So please gi= ve this a thought :) .
I am an exclusive GNU/Linux user and all I miss from windoze is the simplic= ity of a simple command or switch .
I found this e-mail in the man pages= so I hope a don't bother anyone with my message as for this is not a b= ug, only a feature that I wish to see implemented sometime in the future. If there is a way to do it with only "rm" or a simple command and= I missed it please reply , I would be grateful .

Thank you.

= Luca Daniel.
--0016367fb68168649f049c986f07-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 18 22:08:53 2011 Received: (at 8079) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2011 03:08:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PqdBk-0007i5-Dh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:08:52 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PqdBh-0007hq-1L for 8079@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:08:50 -0500 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1J38gEs025668 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:08:42 -0500 Received: from [10.3.113.32] (ovpn-113-32.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.32]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1J38gE0025689; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:08:42 -0500 Message-ID: <4D5F3439.3090802@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:08:41 -0700 From: Eric Blake Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luca Daniel Subject: Re: bug#8079: rm command problem/suggestion References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig044AB5525F7D194702AE732B" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22 X-Spam-Score: -10.2 (----------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8079 Cc: 8079@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -10.2 (----------) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig044AB5525F7D194702AE732B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/18/2011 06:20 PM, Luca Daniel wrote: > Hi there :-) > I have o problem and an suggestion : > 1) The problem: I can't find an easy way to remove a type of file throu= gh > all sub-directories with GNU tool "rm" (remove). There is not an option= to > search through all sub-folders , only in the current working directory.= Back > when I used windows this was easy with the command : del /s *.pdf . # Portable: find . -name '*.pdf' -exec rm {} + # Faster, if you use GNU findutils: find -name '*.pdf' -delete # Or, if you use bash: # one-time setup - add this in your ~/.bashrc shopt -s globstar # then use ** for your goal rm *.pdf **/*.pdf > 2) The suggestion : please make an option for the "rm" command to look = in > sub-directories so it can be easier to use and increase functionality .= Sorry, but this would add bloat to rm, when the find utility already exists for this purpose. And even if we added it to GNU rm, it wouldn't help you on any other Unix-like system where such a new option is not present. The philosophy of doing one thing well, and using the right tool for the job, is rather important. > I asked some people about this problem I have and the answer I got was = not > pretty in the sense that it was not a pretty command =3D) . I can't r= emember > what is was because it was complicated (mixed with locate or find) find may look daunting, but learning it will pay big dividends, as it is then a very powerful tool in your toolbox. --=20 Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --------------enig044AB5525F7D194702AE732B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJNXzQ5AAoJEKeha0olJ0Nqo9oH/2YDZyoNie6kZeIDes2n2Zja VJaoFHdS9SyD/J3o78CjDMGa5bHZJlYKxNAuLpcjVz7Ke8sLDt6e9t/KqIkC37Yz 4RdgkNL4XLfmHqKEJAOhxrsAXsfwSojFNGNXz8WSG8dgFLIZSXhbF1WYhywrmC3M wDPzMGO/GhJnKi7tZE3Q6qxW1o3KDPp2UXDRhEy3A3XLlocj27AtcFm6YJYld/ES NIqqisJ3exbQPeT4dF8IPajGcg95et+tqiZMz5r+EW15XKs5YV3Ii+nbUU1Yity1 g9H6zM3KwjfE4ATWAKXQj7HerxlZ+8Y4kTT46HsYruN8AEI3QrAPZp3pti4NTXc= =y4Qv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig044AB5525F7D194702AE732B-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 18 22:11:08 2011 Received: (at 8079) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2011 03:11:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PqdDv-0007lK-Ou for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:11:07 -0500 Received: from c-67-162-90-113.hsd1.in.comcast.net ([67.162.90.113] helo=kosh.dhis.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PqdDu-0007ks-DH for 8079@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:11:06 -0500 Received: (qmail 11794 invoked by uid 1000); 19 Feb 2011 03:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20110219031100.11793.qmail@kosh.dhis.org> From: "Alan Curry" Subject: Re: bug#8079: rm command problem/suggestion To: lucadaniel84@gmail.com (Luca Daniel) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:10:59 -0500 (GMT+5) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8079 Cc: 8079@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Luca Daniel writes: > > Hi there :-) > I have o problem and an suggestion : > 1) The problem: I can't find an easy way to remove a type of file through > all sub-directories with GNU tool "rm" (remove). There is not an option to > search through all sub-folders , only in the current working directory. Back > when I used windows this was easy with the command : del /s *.pdf . You misplace the blame on rm; the problem is that the standard unix shell doesn't have recursive globbing. Doing it in the shell means that all utilities benefit. rm is just one of them. zsh does recursive globbing with a double-asterisk, so that for example rm **/*.pdf would get rid of all files named *.pdf anywhere under the current directory. bash also knows about the ** recursive glob, but I recommend zsh because it has a lot more cool features, like **/*.(pdf|ps)(m+30Lk-500) (recursive directory search, all files named *.pdf or *.ps, whose last modification was more than 30 days ago, with a size less than 500k) -- Alan Curry From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 18 22:18:45 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2011 03:18:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PqdLJ-0007vy-4L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:18:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PqdLH-0007ve-CO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:18:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqdLB-0001L9-1P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:18:38 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:36833) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqdLA-0001L4-Qv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:18:36 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60024 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PqdL9-0006OW-R0 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:18:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqdL8-0001Ku-QF for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:18:35 -0500 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183]:40628) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqdL8-0001Kp-Ex for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:18:34 -0500 Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7131B4062; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 03:18:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#8079: rm command problem/suggestion Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:18:30 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.37; KDE/4.5.5; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1889622.Qgc5Wv9L4B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201102182218.32183.vapier@gentoo.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 199.232.76.165 X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Luca Daniel , 8079@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) --nextPart1889622.Qgc5Wv9L4B Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday, February 18, 2011 20:20:24 Luca Daniel wrote: > 1) The problem: I can't find an easy way to remove a type of file through > all sub-directories with GNU tool "rm" (remove). There is not an option to > search through all sub-folders , only in the current working directory. > Back when I used windows this was easy with the command : del /s *.pdf . > 2) The suggestion : please make an option for the "rm" command to look in > sub-directories so it can be easier to use and increase functionality . I > asked some people about this problem I have and the answer I got was not > pretty in the sense that it was not a pretty command =3D) . I can't > remember what is was because it was complicated (mixed with locate or > find) and this is the problem ... it should be simple . So please give > this a thought :) . I am an exclusive GNU/Linux user and all I miss from > windoze is the simplicity of a simple command or switch . > I found this e-mail in the man pages so I hope a don't bother anyone with > my message as for this is not a bug, only a feature that I wish to see > implemented sometime in the future. > If there is a way to do it with only "rm" or a simple command and I missed > it please reply , I would be grateful . sorry, but this is out of scope for `rm`. what you want to do is trivial=20 already though: find -name '*.pdf' -delete =2Dmike --nextPart1889622.Qgc5Wv9L4B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJNXzaIAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBixcQAN1YVFWAykhwWZSkjWrRxw2S xGzXQfYHzbs7J674oKvI57kQYpscUCIZqrhbXmOBti9d44/bMcG/Jh0Ffue4FPp2 HTPy/l+vR0bMPn7i8Nx0b/9Cvi/LrTgVzGtzHruCvyi0MMcUki/Uvj28ReSFA/MQ eTzOPsT0cB8ybU7QAigDRdwxgGV5hbnjgltfD/j4JjHb/Yb4zfo+nEvhrTBRk7w4 1NLkJ4mtXUxLcQ5uIkKnaekGYccmL5mdH5DZ5ae0htBSoFQmLa38IuXukH2dxhHC FbKXzfMqRco3Q7jpOq6wUFIbAlJyHDbHvCWg/SEV2P7nNti5Fpk3it3Lp3avvvLT yajiCupUfqXkcZG51A/IOvoS1V/Mv/l7e7xH+jMaVjv4rzogUvhyYFlBm9Fkv2Da PlxO3FufY42LVx/DH/BijidtXKRqNNGiixSggQYzrDwZqZiNuUJf/h0VtVVql4al cJohPVcPkEf5PzRZ9TQguhhWMxarTbdOQq3ORaHJyyImvMiBoRlHRA5Jd5emi+Ks exc9Wpc8nocibG42OGtVLr42rTzbizW/SOQy7JwY9C0FBCIlzabyJDae/+boknD+ mZN4CtkbXvmSAu3R+8IGx+i+Hi+LOJcr/+bJzTGlL8s1E6TZHhlgrM++rxjpBuH2 J8xOJkRncV8iQ8q15QM0 =5MJI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1889622.Qgc5Wv9L4B-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 19 05:52:18 2011 Received: (at 8079-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2011 10:52:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PqkQE-000128-60 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 05:52:18 -0500 Received: from mx.meyering.net ([82.230.74.64]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PqkQC-00011w-UL for 8079-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 05:52:17 -0500 Received: by rho.meyering.net (Acme Bit-Twister, from userid 1000) id 96B3660077; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:52:10 +0100 (CET) From: Jim Meyering To: 8079-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#8079: rm command problem/suggestion In-Reply-To: <4D5F3439.3090802@redhat.com> (Eric Blake's message of "Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:08:41 -0700") References: <4D5F3439.3090802@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:52:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87sjvkl2jp.fsf@rho.meyering.net> Lines: 2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -5.8 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 8079-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.8 (-----) Thanks to all who replied. I'm closing this ticket. From unknown Tue Aug 19 02:52:19 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator