GNU bug report logs - #8064
anyone home?

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: David H <evolvemeans <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:58:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#8064: closed (anyone home?)
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:42:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:50:30 +0100
with message-id <878vxe5o0p.fsf <at> rho.meyering.net>
and subject line Re: bug#8064: anyone home?
has caused the GNU bug report #8064,
regarding anyone home?
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
8064: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8064
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: David H <evolvemeans <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: anyone home?
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:27:37 -0600
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
anyone home?

to help lowly newbies with the "date" command in bash.

please include 1 example that shows the '+' character in front of the format
string. It winds up taking a lot of looking to figure out this simple
syntax.

Thanks

David Heitzman

-- 
Life moves on, whether we act as cowards, or heroes.
[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
To: David H <evolvemeans <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 8064-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#8064: anyone home?
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:50:30 +0100
David H wrote:
> anyone home?
>
> to help lowly newbies with the "date" command in bash.
>
> please include 1 example that shows the '+' character in front of the format
> string. It winds up taking a lot of looking to figure out this simple
> syntax.

I ran "info coreutils date" (because "man date" suggests it),
then searched for "date \+".  Here are two:

     $ date +'%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %z'  # %z is a GNU extension.
     2004-02-29 16:21:42 -0800
     $ date +'@%s.%N'  # %s and %N are GNU extensions.
     @1078100502.692722128


This bug report was last modified 14 years and 121 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.