GNU bug report logs - #7953
>>> valid XML?

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#7953: closed (>>> valid XML?)
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:47:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:46:26 -0400
with message-id <eymxgkcre5.fsf <at> fencepost.gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#7953: >>> valid XML?
has caused the GNU bug report #7953,
regarding >>> valid XML?
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
7953: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7953
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: jidanni <at> jidanni.org
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: >>> valid XML?
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:09:58 +0800

nXML mode still says this is valid XML, despite the >>>>>>.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<kml xmlns="http://www.opengis.net/kml/2.2">
...<name>Chernovtsy, Ukraine</name>>>>>>>

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: 7953-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#7953: >>> valid XML?
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:46:26 -0400

A random sample of online XML validators have no problem with this kind
of thing.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.