From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:49:12 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7953: >>> valid XML? Resent-From: jidanni@jidanni.org Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 7953 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 7953@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.129656890525934 (code B ref -1); Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:02:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2011 14:01:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGng-0006kE-Qm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:01:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGnf-0006k4-KP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:01:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGvm-00025h-B6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:10:07 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:60479) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGvm-00025d-9C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:10:06 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35131 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PkGvl-0000Xq-54 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:10:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGvj-00025D-41 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:10:05 -0500 Received: from mx1.spunky.mail.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.47]:53090 helo=homiemail-a62.g.dreamhost.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGvi-00024R-TY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:10:03 -0500 Received: from homiemail-a62.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a62.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115DD63407C for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 06:10:01 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=jidanni.org ; b=hRDutTgAtHb5naE1OeXtP2GPZcWFzZws+W7UNb/k2lsT8Oq7oaqqLtNQFfnO Z0Gqmwe9h8x8QY7UHB4FrcsAgvY0Ye9WeEpVpm5fGAbNsF5FurSRXsfzJ160x8qT BLUDyqiap5epC7B6BfJwC98gVBEdJb/aQKFg3jIgAeh5JPs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= jidanni.org; bh=U888RhXG7t3NouIR/+VTmY2XDFI=; b=OyYH9Si6JVaVO8D3 C8tgt8Z+Ijjr1jlXFLgBeINb5pmtW/5cjrjjqYfkc5Y5dt8Tg6xuEBKoLFKgCr+4 ch/PzI5IdIoUjpBRHFixn3Zc3XY2oJm3RwiUnc5g0rnDDnGPVxSpPGfA4npfPl0E vvqGOktIu8/i80IbSuqrkIpmLQI= Received: from jidanni.org (125-230-46-168.dynamic.hinet.net [125.230.46.168]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by homiemail-a62.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDD1B63406E for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 06:10:00 -0800 (PST) From: jidanni@jidanni.org Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:09:58 +0800 Message-ID: <87zkqfrgll.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.97.132.47 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 199.232.76.165 X-Spam-Score: -5.7 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.7 (-----) nXML mode still says this is valid XML, despite the >>>>>>. ...Chernovtsy, Ukraine>>>>>> From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:49:12 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7953: >>> valid XML? Resent-From: Kevin Rodgers Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7953 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.129667475722312 (code B ref -1); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:26:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Feb 2011 19:25:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkiKy-0005no-HZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:25:56 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkiKv-0005nc-FG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:25:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkiT1-0004MI-49 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:34:20 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:58610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkiT0-0004MC-VH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:34:15 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37172 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pke9X-0002R0-AW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:57:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkWjK-0007hR-88 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 02:02:19 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:50514) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkWjK-0007gx-1Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 02:02:18 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkWjG-00063i-99 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:02:14 +0100 Received: from c-24-8-96-241.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.96.241]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:02:14 +0100 Received: from kevin.d.rodgers by c-24-8-96-241.hsd1.co.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:02:14 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Kevin Rodgers Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:02:28 -0700 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <87zkqfrgll.fsf@jidanni.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-8-96-241.hsd1.co.comcast.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 In-Reply-To: <87zkqfrgll.fsf@jidanni.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 199.232.76.165 X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) On 2/1/11 7:09 AM, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote: > nXML mode still says this is valid XML, despite the>>>>>>. > > > > ...Chernovtsy, Ukraine>>>>>> From http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/#syntax: The right angle bracket (>) may be represented using the string " > ", and MUST, for compatibility, be escaped using either " > " or a character reference when it appears in the string " ]]> " in content, when that string is not marking the end of a CDATA section. Doesn't that mean that ">" may appear in its literal form in content, when it is not within a string "]]>" (as above)? -- Kevin Rodgers Denver, Colorado, USA From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:49:12 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: jidanni@jidanni.org Subject: bug#7953: closed (Re: bug#7953: >>> valid XML?) Message-ID: References: <87zkqfrgll.fsf@jidanni.org> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 7953 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs X-Gnu-PR-Keywords: notabug Reply-To: 7953@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:47:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1310428022-1495-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1310428022-1495-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #7953: >>> valid XML? which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 7953@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 7953: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D7953 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1310428022-1495-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 7953-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2011 23:46:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQBN-0000NE-TA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:46:34 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQBM-0000N1-BJ for 7953-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:46:32 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38060) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQBG-00044R-Ry; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:46:26 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: 7953-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#7953: >>> valid XML? References: <87zkqfrgll.fsf@jidanni.org> X-Spook: Soviet defense information warfare Uzbekistan red noise X-Ran: LG$MZ?'RN~ZV0Rhujo#(-]KB7U-v;w!:,YIj)gYNLa0u$O\nst+r)feR9klsPs.s-?IJm4 X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:46:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Kevin Rodgers's message of "Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:02:28 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7953-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) A random sample of online XML validators have no problem with this kind of thing. ------------=_1310428022-1495-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2011 14:01:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGng-0006kE-Qm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:01:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGnf-0006k4-KP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:01:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGvm-00025h-B6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:10:07 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:60479) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGvm-00025d-9C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:10:06 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35131 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PkGvl-0000Xq-54 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:10:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGvj-00025D-41 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:10:05 -0500 Received: from mx1.spunky.mail.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.47]:53090 helo=homiemail-a62.g.dreamhost.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGvi-00024R-TY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:10:03 -0500 Received: from homiemail-a62.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a62.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115DD63407C for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 06:10:01 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=jidanni.org ; b=hRDutTgAtHb5naE1OeXtP2GPZcWFzZws+W7UNb/k2lsT8Oq7oaqqLtNQFfnO Z0Gqmwe9h8x8QY7UHB4FrcsAgvY0Ye9WeEpVpm5fGAbNsF5FurSRXsfzJ160x8qT BLUDyqiap5epC7B6BfJwC98gVBEdJb/aQKFg3jIgAeh5JPs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= jidanni.org; bh=U888RhXG7t3NouIR/+VTmY2XDFI=; b=OyYH9Si6JVaVO8D3 C8tgt8Z+Ijjr1jlXFLgBeINb5pmtW/5cjrjjqYfkc5Y5dt8Tg6xuEBKoLFKgCr+4 ch/PzI5IdIoUjpBRHFixn3Zc3XY2oJm3RwiUnc5g0rnDDnGPVxSpPGfA4npfPl0E vvqGOktIu8/i80IbSuqrkIpmLQI= Received: from jidanni.org (125-230-46-168.dynamic.hinet.net [125.230.46.168]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by homiemail-a62.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDD1B63406E for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 06:10:00 -0800 (PST) From: jidanni@jidanni.org To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: >>> valid XML? Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:09:58 +0800 Message-ID: <87zkqfrgll.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.97.132.47 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 199.232.76.165 X-Spam-Score: -5.7 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.7 (-----) nXML mode still says this is valid XML, despite the >>>>>>. ...Chernovtsy, Ukraine>>>>>> ------------=_1310428022-1495-1-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:49:12 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7953: closed (Re: bug#7953: >>> valid XML?) In-Reply-To: <87zkqfrgll.fsf@jidanni.org> Resent-From: jidanni@jidanni.org Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7953 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: 7953@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Received: via spool by 7953-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7953.13104286122400 (code B ref 7953); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:57:01 +0000 Received: (at 7953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2011 23:56:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQLK-0000cf-W7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:56:51 -0400 Received: from caiajhbdccac.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.202] helo=homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQLJ-0000cT-0l for 7953@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:56:50 -0400 Received: from homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 608EF3BC06E; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:56:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:subject :references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s= jidanni.org; b=IY3gDqJCgpOnBx6yGrQOSfm/AH7kHD8batrT8/jrMP/5D6jbO jq2UEQThL0L4lE9Fv4mdz9eRpcfgot4/E8T6NjbxpezrqwQf+/BKNe0+yB+1Ubhw /fw0JlQ2pTtV/AZyK9ZXWhZLMZ1Sohe4rYnuukj6TAfkh1c1Y3kFsDESvY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=jidanni.org; bh=0ocqZKgTucVMiCsbMXWVcPC+fgs=; b=KwWKAYSBcAkdh rdkiIPoI+NIt3YK32grdqaWqtomeuqKhAr4UaeYBz2N7lvXAJuos5Kqn/Z0ZGRys p+2z71sVhphP64HukOgiTbutImCrhVpzfzDI9oPjY4hWa1Pu9wfZavvDxcSmJK06 TnQwiTfqVPxf2YS9ghs84ZO6Xi76Z4= Received: from jidanni.org (218-163-2-112.dynamic.hinet.net [218.163.2.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 012443BC06A; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:56:42 -0700 (PDT) From: jidanni@jidanni.org References: Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:56:40 +0800 Message-ID: <87ei1w74nb.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) Glad to know that you say it is valid XML. GbTS> A random sample of online XML validators have no problem with this kind GbTS> of thing. GbTS> From: jidanni@jidanni.org GbTS> Subject: >>> valid XML? GbTS> To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org GbTS> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:09:58 +0800 (22 weeks, 6 days, 9 hours ago) GbTS> nXML mode still says this is valid XML, despite the >>>>>>. GbTS> GbTS> GbTS> ...Chernovtsy, Ukraine>>>>>> From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:49:12 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7953: closed (Re: bug#7953: >>> valid XML?) In-Reply-To: <87zkqfrgll.fsf@jidanni.org> Resent-From: jidanni@jidanni.org Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7953 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: 7953@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Received: via spool by 7953-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7953.13104287252613 (code B ref 7953); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:59:02 +0000 Received: (at 7953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2011 23:58:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQNA-0000g5-QU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:58:45 -0400 Received: from caiajhbdcaid.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.83] helo=homiemail-a2.g.dreamhost.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQN8-0000fs-6b for 7953@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:58:43 -0400 Received: from homiemail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9A1280077; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:58:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:subject :references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s= jidanni.org; b=VVYh4OtuvqTAEIlVANcIR5uHqvCFYTe3lqo4FR0HrA52J6dWT MsMOi2riMO+hesAB3lF9tuw4mg2JtvdGWoXiP8WLzke2ARIxKKjz6JRqmlIZJ9Zh ADGMAOSQ0SRi4aicziO8aF5KEI0xHnogvx6Q+m86fZY9SSHEzj+Ep+TpAk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=jidanni.org; bh=qtpbqmQ2ZSE+MKlIeu7UYYzFCcw=; b=clXHmldfJDKPD urn9V9XrdgrJo9zvnFmtKF2OErGAKWBYIIquXRwLW5GfDPZ84iLMkQMApwOi9Nl5 c7XC3hedmWs7VM6CgM2jtK1fp3vP9eGf0rWY5CwfVLXvTUwgOnaeGM0opLELxJRU gMRRjp044KAp3lR1NxFbsAbdzyO3gU= Received: from jidanni.org (218-163-2-112.dynamic.hinet.net [218.163.2.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by homiemail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06017280076; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:58:36 -0700 (PDT) From: jidanni@jidanni.org References: Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:58:33 +0800 Message-ID: <87d3hg74k6.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) OK maybe it is valid XML.