From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 01 09:01:45 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2011 14:01:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGng-0006kE-Qm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:01:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGnf-0006k4-KP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:01:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGvm-00025h-B6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:10:07 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:60479) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGvm-00025d-9C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:10:06 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35131 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PkGvl-0000Xq-54 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:10:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGvj-00025D-41 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:10:05 -0500 Received: from mx1.spunky.mail.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.47]:53090 helo=homiemail-a62.g.dreamhost.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGvi-00024R-TY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:10:03 -0500 Received: from homiemail-a62.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a62.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115DD63407C for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 06:10:01 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=jidanni.org ; b=hRDutTgAtHb5naE1OeXtP2GPZcWFzZws+W7UNb/k2lsT8Oq7oaqqLtNQFfnO Z0Gqmwe9h8x8QY7UHB4FrcsAgvY0Ye9WeEpVpm5fGAbNsF5FurSRXsfzJ160x8qT BLUDyqiap5epC7B6BfJwC98gVBEdJb/aQKFg3jIgAeh5JPs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= jidanni.org; bh=U888RhXG7t3NouIR/+VTmY2XDFI=; b=OyYH9Si6JVaVO8D3 C8tgt8Z+Ijjr1jlXFLgBeINb5pmtW/5cjrjjqYfkc5Y5dt8Tg6xuEBKoLFKgCr+4 ch/PzI5IdIoUjpBRHFixn3Zc3XY2oJm3RwiUnc5g0rnDDnGPVxSpPGfA4npfPl0E vvqGOktIu8/i80IbSuqrkIpmLQI= Received: from jidanni.org (125-230-46-168.dynamic.hinet.net [125.230.46.168]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by homiemail-a62.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDD1B63406E for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 06:10:00 -0800 (PST) From: jidanni@jidanni.org To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: >>> valid XML? Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:09:58 +0800 Message-ID: <87zkqfrgll.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.97.132.47 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 199.232.76.165 X-Spam-Score: -5.7 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.7 (-----) nXML mode still says this is valid XML, despite the >>>>>>. ...Chernovtsy, Ukraine>>>>>> From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 02 14:25:56 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Feb 2011 19:25:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkiKy-0005no-HZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:25:56 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkiKv-0005nc-FG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:25:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkiT1-0004MI-49 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:34:20 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:58610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkiT0-0004MC-VH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:34:15 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37172 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pke9X-0002R0-AW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:57:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkWjK-0007hR-88 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 02:02:19 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:50514) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkWjK-0007gx-1Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 02:02:18 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkWjG-00063i-99 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:02:14 +0100 Received: from c-24-8-96-241.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.96.241]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:02:14 +0100 Received: from kevin.d.rodgers by c-24-8-96-241.hsd1.co.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:02:14 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org From: Kevin Rodgers Subject: Re: bug#7953: >>> valid XML? Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:02:28 -0700 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <87zkqfrgll.fsf@jidanni.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-8-96-241.hsd1.co.comcast.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 In-Reply-To: <87zkqfrgll.fsf@jidanni.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 199.232.76.165 X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) On 2/1/11 7:09 AM, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote: > nXML mode still says this is valid XML, despite the>>>>>>. > > > > ...Chernovtsy, Ukraine>>>>>> From http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/#syntax: The right angle bracket (>) may be represented using the string " > ", and MUST, for compatibility, be escaped using either " > " or a character reference when it appears in the string " ]]> " in content, when that string is not marking the end of a CDATA section. Doesn't that mean that ">" may appear in its literal form in content, when it is not within a string "]]>" (as above)? -- Kevin Rodgers Denver, Colorado, USA From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 11 19:46:34 2011 Received: (at 7953-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2011 23:46:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQBN-0000NE-TA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:46:34 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQBM-0000N1-BJ for 7953-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:46:32 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38060) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQBG-00044R-Ry; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:46:26 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: 7953-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#7953: >>> valid XML? References: <87zkqfrgll.fsf@jidanni.org> X-Spook: Soviet defense information warfare Uzbekistan red noise X-Ran: LG$MZ?'RN~ZV0Rhujo#(-]KB7U-v;w!:,YIj)gYNLa0u$O\nst+r)feR9klsPs.s-?IJm4 X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:46:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Kevin Rodgers's message of "Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:02:28 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7953-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) A random sample of online XML validators have no problem with this kind of thing. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 11 19:56:51 2011 Received: (at 7953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2011 23:56:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQLK-0000cf-W7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:56:51 -0400 Received: from caiajhbdccac.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.202] helo=homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQLJ-0000cT-0l for 7953@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:56:50 -0400 Received: from homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 608EF3BC06E; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:56:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:subject :references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s= jidanni.org; b=IY3gDqJCgpOnBx6yGrQOSfm/AH7kHD8batrT8/jrMP/5D6jbO jq2UEQThL0L4lE9Fv4mdz9eRpcfgot4/E8T6NjbxpezrqwQf+/BKNe0+yB+1Ubhw /fw0JlQ2pTtV/AZyK9ZXWhZLMZ1Sohe4rYnuukj6TAfkh1c1Y3kFsDESvY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=jidanni.org; bh=0ocqZKgTucVMiCsbMXWVcPC+fgs=; b=KwWKAYSBcAkdh rdkiIPoI+NIt3YK32grdqaWqtomeuqKhAr4UaeYBz2N7lvXAJuos5Kqn/Z0ZGRys p+2z71sVhphP64HukOgiTbutImCrhVpzfzDI9oPjY4hWa1Pu9wfZavvDxcSmJK06 TnQwiTfqVPxf2YS9ghs84ZO6Xi76Z4= Received: from jidanni.org (218-163-2-112.dynamic.hinet.net [218.163.2.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 012443BC06A; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:56:42 -0700 (PDT) From: jidanni@jidanni.org To: 7953@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#7953: closed (Re: bug#7953: >>> valid XML?) References: Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:56:40 +0800 Message-ID: <87ei1w74nb.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7953 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) Glad to know that you say it is valid XML. GbTS> A random sample of online XML validators have no problem with this kind GbTS> of thing. GbTS> From: jidanni@jidanni.org GbTS> Subject: >>> valid XML? GbTS> To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org GbTS> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:09:58 +0800 (22 weeks, 6 days, 9 hours ago) GbTS> nXML mode still says this is valid XML, despite the >>>>>>. GbTS> GbTS> GbTS> ...Chernovtsy, Ukraine>>>>>> From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 11 19:58:45 2011 Received: (at 7953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2011 23:58:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQNA-0000g5-QU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:58:45 -0400 Received: from caiajhbdcaid.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.83] helo=homiemail-a2.g.dreamhost.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQN8-0000fs-6b for 7953@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:58:43 -0400 Received: from homiemail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9A1280077; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:58:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:subject :references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s= jidanni.org; b=VVYh4OtuvqTAEIlVANcIR5uHqvCFYTe3lqo4FR0HrA52J6dWT MsMOi2riMO+hesAB3lF9tuw4mg2JtvdGWoXiP8WLzke2ARIxKKjz6JRqmlIZJ9Zh ADGMAOSQ0SRi4aicziO8aF5KEI0xHnogvx6Q+m86fZY9SSHEzj+Ep+TpAk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=jidanni.org; bh=qtpbqmQ2ZSE+MKlIeu7UYYzFCcw=; b=clXHmldfJDKPD urn9V9XrdgrJo9zvnFmtKF2OErGAKWBYIIquXRwLW5GfDPZ84iLMkQMApwOi9Nl5 c7XC3hedmWs7VM6CgM2jtK1fp3vP9eGf0rWY5CwfVLXvTUwgOnaeGM0opLELxJRU gMRRjp044KAp3lR1NxFbsAbdzyO3gU= Received: from jidanni.org (218-163-2-112.dynamic.hinet.net [218.163.2.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by homiemail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06017280076; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:58:36 -0700 (PDT) From: jidanni@jidanni.org To: 7953@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#7953: closed (Re: bug#7953: >>> valid XML?) References: Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:58:33 +0800 Message-ID: <87d3hg74k6.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7953 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) OK maybe it is valid XML. From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:39:31 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator