From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 16 02:31:25 2025 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2025 06:31:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46453 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uyPDo-0000J2-RZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 02:31:25 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:53120) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uyPDc-0000F8-EM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 02:31:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uyPDE-0005Em-MI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 02:30:50 -0400 Received: from relay.yourmailgateway.de ([188.68.63.166]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uyPD7-0008Vw-0Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 02:30:46 -0400 Received: from mors-relay-8202.netcup.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mors-relay-8202.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cQsTd1fsNz40Z0 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:30:29 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=rd10.de; s=key2; t=1758004229; bh=m703Tsyct76LFtiqFf/xU6IpeTwgch89/sIjTpc2VAs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=cUPR5xFAHpzG/dHTc8hdMNVfyshmZ2eN8jS+6Kw5rW/OPAprDmmzPHKG/be8/BEuK YlHkJXNg/a6wJgh6dLVHdizPYZ2gNzi7X0dAYcAnV2zOwuJPRj7ha3id57Ifj4pX7J ztyyVA9Z5+B3yQdp5swMm+HPl2GJZIhgKl3gYrXpHq7MDx36QaKycch8ydwYtsvYPG XmGJvbsCP6Q2Isij4LXMKJZv9auaL0wUnY7F/B4m46xfxFMDAAbPzEzlJQwBPSMM8V lAKhNAgrKiVsDLWg+wjNeRv8cuivLORZBncLv7yTrdfg9feGMK97XLtyusjQ0/ApLK wagVrRdbGz8CA== Received: from policy02-mors.netcup.net (unknown [46.38.225.35]) by mors-relay-8202.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cQsTd0zFqz40YG for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:30:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx2eb1.netcup.net (unknown [10.243.12.53]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by policy02-mors.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cQsTc6BnHz8sZh for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:30:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.117.38] (111.red-88-23-15.staticip.rima-tde.net [88.23.15.111]) by mx2eb1.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2DA1A1005E0 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:30:24 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mx2eb1; spf=pass (sender IP is 88.23.15.111) smtp.mailfrom=rdiez-2006@rd10.de smtp.helo=[192.168.117.38] Received-SPF: pass (mx2eb1: connection is authenticated) Message-ID: <5367a388-5478-4da8-a94f-4d4e352cd00b@rd10.de> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:30:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB From: "R. Diez" To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=22Value_=E2=80=981=E2=80=99_does_not_match_type_boolean?= =?UTF-8?Q?=22_should_mention_which_variable?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-PPP-Message-ID: <175800422439.974359.1365894754955035434@mx2eb1.netcup.net> X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd-worker-8404 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2DA1A1005E0 X-NC-CID: OT8NpoDrm4DKqqAhgI6eAkYPUGEtr4S0X9x6jIXL Received-SPF: pass client-ip=188.68.63.166; envelope-from=rdiez-2006@rd10.de; helo=relay.yourmailgateway.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) SGkgYWxsOg0KDQpJIHJlY2VudGx5IHVwZ3JhZGVkIGZyb20gRW1hY3MgMjkgdG8gMzAsIGFu ZCBJIGdvdCB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIHdhcm5pbmcgaW4gdGhlICpXYXJuaW5ncyogYnVmZmVy Og0KDQpXYXJuaW5nIChlbWFjcyk6IFZhbHVlIOKAmDHigJkgZG9lcyBub3QgbWF0Y2ggdHlw ZSBib29sZWFuDQoNCkkgYW0gbm8gTGlzcCBleHBlcnQsIGJ1dCBJIHN0aWxsIGhhdmUgYWNj dW11bGF0ZWQgYSBiaWdnaXNoIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24gb3ZlciB0aGUgeWVhcnMsIHNvIGl0 IHRvb2sgbWUgYSB3aGlsZSB0byBmaW5kIHRoZSBjdWxwcml0Og0KDQooc2V0b3B0IGluaGli aXQtc3RhcnR1cC1zY3JlZW4gMSkNCg0KSSB0aGVuIGNoYW5nZWQgJzEnIHRvICd0JywgYW5k IHRoZSBwcm9ibGVtIHdlbnQgYXdheS4NCg0KVGhlIHRyb3VibGUgaXMsIEkgbG9zdCBxdWl0 ZSBhIGxvdCBvZiB0aW1lIHRvIHRoaXMgdHJpdmlhbCBtYXR0ZXIuIEkgYW0gdGhpbmtpbmcg dGhhdCBvdGhlciBwZW9wbGUgY291bGQgZW5jb3VudGVyIHRoZSBzYW1lIGlzc3VlIGFuZCBs b3NlIHRpbWUgdG9vLg0KDQpDb3VsZCB5b3UgbWVudGlvbiB0aGUgdmFyaWFibGUgbmFtZSBp biB0aGUgZXJyb3IgbWVzc2FnZT8gTGlrZSB0aGlzOg0KDQpXYXJuaW5nIChlbWFjcyk6IFdo ZW4gc2V0dGluZyB2YXJpYWJsZSDigJh3aGF0ZXZlci12YXJpYWJsZeKAmTogVmFsdWUg4oCY MeKAmSBkb2VzIG5vdCBtYXRjaCB0eXBlIGJvb2xlYW4NCg0KSW4gbXkgc29mdHdhcmUsIEkg bm9ybWFsbHkgZG8gYSB0cnkvY2F0Y2ggdG8gYWRkIHN1Y2ggYSBwcmVmaXgsIHNvIG5vIG1h dHRlciB3aGF0IGVycm9yIGlzIHJhaXNlZCwgdGhlIGN1bHByaXQgaXMgYWx3YXlzIG1lbnRp b25lZC4NCg0KUmVnYXJkcywNCiAgIHJkaWV6DQo= From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 16 08:13:43 2025 Received: (at 79455-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2025 12:13:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47683 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uyUZ4-0007Lr-Mc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:13:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32824) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uyUZ0-0007LU-23 for 79455-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:13:38 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uyUYt-0007IZ-A2; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:13:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=5R5/qKpkUYjPxsWwFGUM1TE3o01eSRGLfsCHsDSWad0=; b=Lk1rLrK+uNzItS9h4MA0 kDr3262ts/81bGaDK0ctB1T0gS+oxISI9/tRPTl2xSKG9u8Ad+hXGdRMaMfiWKb3aXUXtmWJ5X4s/ scdz2O6KG1LXlM/GaXQWQxXHxyMXcgV0fVxPBIVkLut2b7Tle8FdtmqLVfsRuswrceG4kLDv6l6gH Z/jMstccLruwTPhNe4qK6/ecKtYhosxNJul1Kd/VH6sTLJVG1k0GYVVCtmelKR5V4ESo3Vyu4dt+l 2WouJ8xa/8pxNrqlf4tW2l8iSQhJLynAKGRzje68NosmKMFwNrsb4yuoB1i6XhaXd3pvqBlPhJYpw 97cfHO8EhOMC8w==; Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 15:13:26 +0300 Message-Id: <86v7limw7t.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: "R. Diez" In-Reply-To: <5367a388-5478-4da8-a94f-4d4e352cd00b@rd10.de> (bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org) Subject: Re: bug#79455: "Value =?utf-8?B?4oCYMeKAmQ==?= does not match type boolean" should mention which variable References: <5367a388-5478-4da8-a94f-4d4e352cd00b@rd10.de> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 79455-done Cc: 79455-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:30:22 +0200 > From: "R. Diez" via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > Hi all: > > I recently upgraded from Emacs 29 to 30, and I got the following warning in the *Warnings* buffer: > > Warning (emacs): Value ‘1’ does not match type boolean > > I am no Lisp expert, but I still have accumulated a biggish configuration over the years, so it took me a while to find the culprit: > > (setopt inhibit-startup-screen 1) > > I then changed '1' to 't', and the problem went away. > > The trouble is, I lost quite a lot of time to this trivial matter. I am thinking that other people could encounter the same issue and lose time too. > > Could you mention the variable name in the error message? Like this: > > Warning (emacs): When setting variable ‘whatever-variable’: Value ‘1’ does not match type boolean Thanks, this is bug#73084, which is already fixed on the master branch (which will eventually become Emacs 31). On the master branch, Emacs says this instead: Warning (emacs): Value ‘1’ for variable ‘inhibit-startup-screen’ does not match its type "boolean" So I'm closing this bug. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 16 08:16:49 2025 Received: (at 79455) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2025 12:16:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47725 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uyUc5-0007iG-C0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:16:49 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::331]:51580) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uyUc0-0007hq-5v for 79455@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:16:45 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45dde353b47so32723405e9.3 for <79455@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 05:16:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1758024997; x=1758629797; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=x00NkFny6Tc8Zikoc5fSN10uoPNJDBitVE+8YLlevF0=; b=isiqpqhuBHlAo+X93SVH1f3yRcw1/XTLFQfK53z32v97JeyvKyQew/5mT1KrNRRYKK +oirFGs1Rb0UgAhSHDXL9XBl+58Ac8fSl8YhFvFMhjr+Rh+HTfRVgp3t0U+Beyp2sMS2 t2mES3hg/RKeO4LfvOpT1iz+9GyiGcCl7jyIBjzXtDkvH9iL4YttOonaVBdQ/H8BuZeJ 27X9eROWvpPAgHdzbllGbAkLbiWadAGeSFu06gw5qYPe7hsSZeX6PBilUQY5AGc0go+T 3l2AIFfQw5AEWz03BXOvFLquVnklG+f8XyG4gPCUaKBiUfdJRM/5dvgtRfH9nAterKt9 Bmkw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1758024997; x=1758629797; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=x00NkFny6Tc8Zikoc5fSN10uoPNJDBitVE+8YLlevF0=; b=Ln+X73oHjDhqt6BFPXCPpJ1Qw87zcNYMltrqalJ4DXBY3OEbRbPBcmiGOQBBKEr8hw C/cFbBW+BTIeqSzX/1pgDytVQEUKiklYg9tEaqXXycbOZxS2rw2VskKNwPIsSQ9Zlipt fAg9HjYJ/ctojBfzMqtPR3Ozbc79/jsP4obzhg8swzIlGqYTuF0s25HIaGDmYAjbF+72 Vf1pgRE+/0nfsL1qnkqChV2VyAELR+3dNNZRiTBo8KqTAMMpmjif6iGN9ljiDt1WwiKI 5niMsrpFP7s7+hRQKOff2lRQD6GOqd8ROn1e+/blf4CtdgrB+rc/0YEwfj8aDBpxUQZA YHSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyiW2qH7enIaBwKIbV4LP6kjf38Ow3IutG7F8iQ9Is8vagVcMaR ANyY3R7PYu5xUzpVKJ9MriuJ/SROzGnM3wHaD9FkFkpLBVkiDb/dioVW X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvHTpOslwj+DMFLSgU5Ezj/QIHl667T71BqbF3JVmerQtUYJhhW132dyUzQKfk yPeu7sGwWv4/eQ10ENIthlf3/GpSIHi+LIedeJFuCjA/CKG97WH/W+V8Fg7W7rxqeLf0yVQnGqq z8ppEBPzFaogqxOnkB/HcG6Jq0OwipszmcG6tZeFLxGkbJaF6FELZzlRZlTH6/4Mi4wQSuds/Tn 8bY6I4hM7ncfHVAWE/5p27Q73QF+vL/EP7Cl85K9K+mg3Fq5378JSgJn99uvqyX2rr/hEwpeQmm u8BQFAYs2PCf1rpkmGWGalpEulPtC8Vm3tvoH6zLP2/MkRUyzxQRPawzivGctFiDGPyQwauiN0Q XqGTzHaIMl68d2uzqd9xt X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEqRzJQi98IYCrk62GuaDOYqIMez4aX53kn2MxXOfJPkwczVPtU1fvBP90KnI35OKp8aZsbug== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4443:b0:456:1b6f:c888 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45f211f7572mr140151345e9.23.1758024996926; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 05:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rltb ([2a01:e0a:3f3:fb50:6ad3:5bae:7e0a:d158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-3e7607870cfsm22489726f8f.19.2025.09.16.05.16.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Sep 2025 05:16:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Robert Pluim To: Subject: Re: bug#79455: "Value =?utf-8?B?4oCYMeKAmQ==?= does not match type boolean" should mention which variable In-Reply-To: <5367a388-5478-4da8-a94f-4d4e352cd00b@rd10.de> References: <5367a388-5478-4da8-a94f-4d4e352cd00b@rd10.de> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 14:16:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87o6ravbh8.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 79455 Cc: 79455@debbugs.gnu.org, "R. Diez" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:30:22 +0200, "R. Diez" via "Bug reports for GN= U Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" said: rdiez> Hi all: rdiez> I recently upgraded from Emacs 29 to 30, and I got the following= warning in the *Warnings* buffer: rdiez> Warning (emacs): Value =E2=80=981=E2=80=99 does not match type b= oolean rdiez> I am no Lisp expert, but I still have accumulated a biggish conf= iguration over the years, so it took me a while to find the culprit: rdiez> (setopt inhibit-startup-screen 1) rdiez> I then changed '1' to 't', and the problem went away. rdiez> The trouble is, I lost quite a lot of time to this trivial matte= r. I rdiez> am thinking that other people could encounter the same issue and= lose rdiez> time too. rdiez> Could you mention the variable name in the error message? Like t= his: rdiez> Warning (emacs): When setting variable =E2=80=98whatever-variabl= e=E2=80=99: Value =E2=80=981=E2=80=99 does not match type boolean Emacs 31 has changed it to this: (warn "Value `%S' for variable `%s' does not match its type \"%s\"" value variable type) Robert --=20 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 16 10:18:35 2025 Received: (at 79455-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2025 14:18:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49052 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uyWVv-0000ya-A1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 10:18:35 -0400 Received: from relay.yourmailgateway.de ([188.68.63.98]:40035) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uyWVr-0000yE-Se for 79455-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 10:18:33 -0400 Received: from mors-relay-2501.netcup.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mors-relay-2501.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cR3sc2Jyfz6813; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:18:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=rd10.de; s=key2; t=1758032308; bh=EjaxYbOk07XHVxmvcRyUoET0dfji4NBfIc3vZ4OaKY8=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=kbIcQMH0ikpWh6P3Qvp1QA6BDijGn/toKhSWzck1WqLWQfopLPO5MWlS2rc9AnM1W toUGFTZ8D5EL3dTm/MB/SyALLAC3QH8TT62AXqmOyiJxdUTsPtyM9CAyeCgtkBWdRb xxLlQNApX/at2r8O7onqXj6uSAeN1ewtEchuvhdH9NrsiPL8VAw4xYNVv1N+JUyKHX 8sCAh5b70yk2NQdf74QuqA4FQH4mACSxXJZVDLrX73Vio/7/p66J1LIUC9jUz9jclv Cm4ya+NooTXaFnwHuPK/snXiJN4W/q4UoHE50vmQ8NR+Jns0hb3kgGnGk4WyawJZUx 466ufI6uiM1fw== Received: from policy01-mors.netcup.net (unknown [46.38.225.35]) by mors-relay-2501.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cR3sc1Zvsz4xXS; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:18:28 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at policy01-mors.netcup.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.901 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mx2eb1.netcup.net (unknown [10.243.12.53]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by policy01-mors.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cR3sZ50DCz8tYN; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:18:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.117.38] (111.red-88-23-15.staticip.rima-tde.net [88.23.15.111]) by mx2eb1.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B77D3100152; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:18:21 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mx2eb1; spf=pass (sender IP is 88.23.15.111) smtp.mailfrom=rdiez-2006@rd10.de smtp.helo=[192.168.117.38] Received-SPF: pass (mx2eb1: connection is authenticated) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:18:21 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IGJ1ZyM3OTQ1NTogIlZhbHVlIOKAmDHigJkgZG9lcyBub3QgbWF0?= =?UTF-8?Q?ch_type_boolean=22_should_mention_which_variable?= To: Eli Zaretskii References: <5367a388-5478-4da8-a94f-4d4e352cd00b@rd10.de> <86v7limw7t.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-GB From: "R. Diez" In-Reply-To: <86v7limw7t.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PPP-Message-ID: <175803230206.1889859.7637754498241239091@mx2eb1.netcup.net> X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd-worker-8404 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B77D3100152 X-NC-CID: RQ/ouMahGqe1WTlGqehikyWjC1cXt6i3pOuwIYLu X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 79455-done Cc: Robert Pluim , 79455-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) [..] > Thanks, this is bug#73084, which is already fixed on the master branch > (which will eventually become Emacs 31). First of all, thanks for the info. That improvement was done over a year ago, and I hit this shortcoming the other day, after upgrading to the newest Emacs. It is a trivial change. Therefore, I wouldn't wait until Emacs 31, and then let many users switching to Emacs 30.x (perhaps over a Linux distribution package) unnecessarily scratch their heads. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 16 10:45:26 2025 Received: (at 79455) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2025 14:45:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49212 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uyWvu-0002mw-D3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 10:45:26 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::329]:44436) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uyWvs-0002mX-3r for 79455@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 10:45:24 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45df7dc1b98so38461865e9.1 for <79455@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 07:45:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1758033917; x=1758638717; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=13FGxj/64InvPbJ20CCYKRx8dy3XqoUoaZk0MIr0SWY=; b=iFSqS+1wGU46RfLsVIj6sL/uOBZZNTWNwbEGig/NBh/aU49y+PFf7bYcK4Y0A0yEmX UsizPIH7zVV+ac5DNA4MFjtBW5pWbPEPVay4Y0hqK6HPyCkxtsWlNLRgN4AKC4QGK4SY hxuDJmSWrM4kbj+c1GY8dOcRR+7xmMPQ0Gkzh2lkCGAnPw+zaa8kQwN/Rx9A7LGEO/VJ dPox5eYxRjVHQmeYSCdCoOCEEOBb0GEu05NsfOjczt8J8j26G57nT5VyhWqjZ6NT6Egm sn6aXI18doqXGwXDyX1CBFOswZuYVSFrvrKPXNxm2GKXdxSMx7ZSoNA88Ai0ZJbMgP5A WX9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1758033917; x=1758638717; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=13FGxj/64InvPbJ20CCYKRx8dy3XqoUoaZk0MIr0SWY=; b=eHUKRhSypTz3WOaSS+tsR+mQcxmDLPt1Ltkjj5MB0YhzzLTxIPh31vpjXaoq4ncXjp u+9ENgyQoT7QWDzFNEqQ6L5fh+4cP3r8QpUNhTE021xQ2DYYhHoIe27Z8FVzam3LDDBg iJVAlwco1HuotIJriQMm7nKiGeQB+Q6EgHlJI0dZK/rS1+S0doIdW7y+gJ/qahAWkrzZ 6aHTg++U4NMPVjZbTUjLrBILSDuyScdvRGSxn3hnVjd9pflUoC5DO7upvvfv0PgY8gEe tvv+sr+3oj42aDvkBT6hj4buYbRG9HL9ey72JRUfxpigknubLigcFooASWLgTnYxOgm9 9U9Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVQSFSLAfT9tbGPlph/1I9kRfxk2dntSf7gwCkohauyLC7zGdXklxzSpqjzX0/2JLPKyB/QiA==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw2rhdSCDQcP4nz4U8TFB+auYIW15YaQsN3Kf68kLw1kJO2FMEc n8S2fnmT6xnphAe5cmJKFUHtJCEPZkx3fwNc8/7p7yA5hRb/+87B3ZUsVtYAkHw+ X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvMmRiQKzg9P+59v73GqA4uFWX5WK7Vf4gShjMchcwmLXyWqtvWFUBCZsTmfPs yPyim30gAo59YDy15j4Oph07/b5KgLogystAot1E+FWVP3gRwLwsseaZip/Ya+5urnzfv86j8Eu wYVf4F0b8Ki256pzmXifjA+nrZuvgWZR4ax6j/mA77gqyrz27t7Gc3q/rY8SmEPcVonFfvm97b+ Ky3rbpwOzIuWDP4RMmdq1uWQ6qlTkBxeIbR4fnvXLzvaHU4exelmvI1jzmb8OoQKinmP6bVp8KM B2mMOJKYfniv+xKMObeSJbEFHLo9jVF8HQYQJOvH8dKOdlH+gVEdI/vCmYW81wTcIZhzvEXj6R9 QAwUMRDEJZMQAUwxOB6mN X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IExlEwpfMVQTvjWcJh+DWHEc8sdYAkH4OrZP6mmkiWlUPYRDpAFA+jZwPHMA9GjSAk87ZkS6w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f89:b0:45b:868e:7f80 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45f211c8388mr196166115e9.8.1758033916619; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 07:45:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rltb ([2a01:e0a:3f3:fb50:6ad3:5bae:7e0a:d158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-3e81dbf9acdsm15194302f8f.55.2025.09.16.07.45.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Sep 2025 07:45:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Robert Pluim To: "R. Diez" Subject: Re: bug#79455: "Value =?utf-8?B?4oCYMeKAmQ==?= does not match type boolean" should mention which variable In-Reply-To: References: <5367a388-5478-4da8-a94f-4d4e352cd00b@rd10.de> <86v7limw7t.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:45:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87jz1yv4lg.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 79455 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 79455@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:18:21 +0200, "R. Diez" sa= id: R> [..] >> Thanks, this is bug#73084, which is already fixed on the master bran= ch >> (which will eventually become Emacs 31). R> First of all, thanks for the info. R> That improvement was done over a year ago, and I hit this shortcomin= g the other day, after upgrading to the newest Emacs. R> It is a trivial change. Therefore, I wouldn't wait until Emacs 31, a= nd R> then let many users switching to Emacs 30.x (perhaps over a Linux R> distribution package) unnecessarily scratch their heads. I=CA=BCm not sure there will ever be another release of Emacs 30. Eli, I can backport 2ce0d397b12c to emacs-30 if you think it makes sense. Robert --=20 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 16 11:44:03 2025 Received: (at 79455) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2025 15:44:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49435 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uyXqc-0008WQ-FB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:44:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52666) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uyXqV-0008Vr-Jb for 79455@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:44:00 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uyXqO-0004gD-Te; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:43:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=9cyFT1h1fxDk8mMdLb0yXd0pnz6qZVT0xhJjzCpqXX0=; b=IrjuTDN4EUGhUqsFPi5D eQfj1KPtOnQU66IjBaiRRyjeWNreD/HNqM6Hdc2+FMerkqb8nFEC2sk7jI0xncMtQAxGV5E2y02qD KEP7LOokzZVsL/mCXWr+9uCDAoyaaVz6jDZ5Vf1LaRP7LksjzV6/2YXVA0kj14X0jDAcVnk1nR5Ix 71r5fQgX8k/vfdmg1cFiv9auCozu76FICQBPCVEFkSAVphx9T66aOAL05eShyQ4Jq/df+G8hXduaE I3o5JqOf3BCvnN+8ZAqGQ/Z/jNuVtDV8QrRedUQVpIDq0EK0T6rXrUlB9xvcjB/dzWKvlNo2stLIb Z4nChT+arqf1PA==; Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 18:43:11 +0300 Message-Id: <86qzw6mmi8.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: "R. Diez" In-Reply-To: (rdiez-2006@rd10.de) Subject: Re: bug#79455: "Value =?utf-8?B?4oCYMeKAmQ==?= does not match type boolean" should mention which variable References: <5367a388-5478-4da8-a94f-4d4e352cd00b@rd10.de> <86v7limw7t.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 79455 Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, 79455@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.901 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, > BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no > Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:18:21 +0200 > Cc: 79455-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Robert Pluim > From: "R. Diez" > > [..] > > Thanks, this is bug#73084, which is already fixed on the master branch > > (which will eventually become Emacs 31). > > First of all, thanks for the info. > > That improvement was done over a year ago, and I hit this shortcoming the other day, after upgrading to the newest Emacs. > > It is a trivial change. Therefore, I wouldn't wait until Emacs 31, and then let many users switching to Emacs 30.x (perhaps over a Linux distribution package) unnecessarily scratch their heads. Sorry, our rule is no enhancements on the release branch. We paid with sweat, blood, and tears to learn that simple truth. You can always apply that change locally and rebuild Emacs 30 for your needs. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 16 11:46:13 2025 Received: (at 79455) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2025 15:46:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49443 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uyXsj-0000G1-Dq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:46:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46768) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uyXsh-0000Fg-E6 for 79455@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:46:12 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uyXsb-0005DH-Ey; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:46:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=I89VD+Xg1NeKffrg7/xxALCCYXrSaIk4KrSHMeGCFNo=; b=SYljE9hmIh70f/aq11pG YjPUvLRl29auKUMstUbnaj4GVLkHeMdO//63tMToD8cIMNwkYDTKosZRPs2gvBvu1Ov76WvhS4Nji rr4c8owL2jRY6yHTMsjBuksQN8y7iyn4REd+V6H9uO1iqIwCckhiNFfJC0GwEuiR6WeK9GZ7j72ff p0q+Lou/zMcQMBpZ+GFgyZUqoboQS02YlWYBXWr5rHnlsHH2UE3gX+SvLMMWDWwzZmL8eGK7hLhqK ZjstGrKqyD+bMe0zIxBgL5al92J5s0DEyWEKgoLM7t9kU3AxRii2OGC4tCaw5v1ioLnWfQiCL/Su4 JzXLt80lzNRVjA==; Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 18:45:50 +0300 Message-Id: <86plbqmmdt.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Robert Pluim In-Reply-To: <87jz1yv4lg.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:45:15 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#79455: "Value =?utf-8?B?4oCYMeKAmQ==?= does not match type boolean" should mention which variable References: <5367a388-5478-4da8-a94f-4d4e352cd00b@rd10.de> <86v7limw7t.fsf@gnu.org> <87jz1yv4lg.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 79455 Cc: rdiez-2006@rd10.de, 79455@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 79455@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:45:15 +0200 > > >>>>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:18:21 +0200, "R. Diez" said: > > R> [..] > >> Thanks, this is bug#73084, which is already fixed on the master branch > >> (which will eventually become Emacs 31). > > R> First of all, thanks for the info. > > R> That improvement was done over a year ago, and I hit this shortcoming the other day, after upgrading to the newest Emacs. > > R> It is a trivial change. Therefore, I wouldn't wait until Emacs 31, and > R> then let many users switching to Emacs 30.x (perhaps over a Linux > R> distribution package) unnecessarily scratch their heads. > > Iʼm not sure there will ever be another release of Emacs 30. > > Eli, I can backport 2ce0d397b12c to emacs-30 if you think it makes > sense. It doesn't make much sense, since we don't plan any more releases from the emacs-30 branch. And even if we do need to release from that branch for some reason, this is not a bugfix, it's an enhancement. Which is why it was done on the master branch to begin with.