GNU bug report logs - #79440
31.0.50; Docstring of dired-find-subdir confuses the values

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: michael_heerdegen <at> web.de

Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 06:15:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 31.0.50

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Full log


Message #10 received at 79440-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: michael_heerdegen <at> web.de
Cc: 79440-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#79440: 31.0.50;
 Docstring of dired-find-subdir confuses the values
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 13:48:04 +0300
> Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 08:15:30 +0200
> From:  Michael Heerdegen via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> unless I'm somehow confused...
> 
> the docstring of dired-find-subdir says:
> 
> | If non-nil, Dired always finds a directory in a buffer of its own.
> | If nil, Dired finds the directory as a subdirectory in some other buffer
> | if it is present as one.
> 
> But if you look at `dired-find-buffer-nocreate', you see that it's
> exactly the other way round.  Also the plain name suggests the opposite
> meaning.  Look: In
> 
> 0a44133e626 "(dired-find-subdir): Doc fix." (Richard M. Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org> 1994-10-26)
> 
> this part of the docstring has been changed, the docstring version
> before that commit started with
> 
> | *If non-nil, Dired does not make a new buffer for a directory if it
> | can be found (perhaps as subdir) in some existing Dired buffer.
> 
> which was correct.  The new version looks like a typo.  Or I just don't
> understand the words of the recent version.

Thanks, fixed on the emacs-30 branch, and closing the bug.




This bug report was last modified 5 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.