GNU bug report logs - #79346
igc: PolicyShouldCollectWorld

Previous Next

Full log

Message #89 received at 79346 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 79346 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, eller.helmut <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#79346: igc: PolicyShouldCollectWorld
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2025 10:43:46 +0300

> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: eller.helmut <at> gmail.com,  79346 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2025 09:02:21 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com>
> >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  79346 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2025 20:05:26 +0200
> >> 
> >> I've branched a new scratch/igc2 from feature/igc for more "freestyle"
> >> changes.
> >
> > Will someone merge from that branch to feature/igc?  Or is this a
> > completely independent effort?
> >
> > IOW, what is the intended use of this new branch, and how, if at all
> > will it fit into the work on adding igc to Emacs?
> >
> > For example, if I have an igc-related change to install, on which of
> > the two branches should I do that?
> 
> ATM, it's thought of a place where one can experiment with things
> without being faced with bureaucratic hurdles, so to speak. Depends on
> whether Helmut finds that useful, otherwise I'd delete it again.

What "bureaucratic hurdles" are those?

Also, does this mean this branch is only for Helmut (and maybe
yourself) to use, and others should not push anything there without
talking to you first?

And my question about merges still stands, in case this branch will
get some changes.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.