From unknown Sat Sep 13 06:04:32 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#79249 <79249@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#79249 <79249@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 30.2; Fonts in Emacs 30.2 vs 30.1 Reply-To: bug#79249 <79249@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 13:04:32 +0000 retitle 79249 30.2; Fonts in Emacs 30.2 vs 30.1 reassign 79249 emacs submitter 79249 Jeremy Bryant severity 79249 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 15 16:29:19 2025 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Aug 2025 20:29:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39791 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1un139-00056j-Fp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2025 16:29:19 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:39052) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1un136-00056Q-WB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2025 16:29:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1un12v-0004Om-2g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2025 16:29:09 -0400 Received: from out-173.mta0.migadu.com ([91.218.175.173]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1un12q-0003Sy-US for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2025 16:29:03 -0400 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jeremybryant.net; s=key1; t=1755289735; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=LyKiyKG3WrWSaRt4VLR6GJ1sic5mb0w7krNJ97xZatM=; b=H50pDMS8a0snX6s0+NbCWOvcF1/xTK91i4NZItA9iym4BuuJ5eBHQ35dlefxg/6BHZXu0c i5WaULtqDWPuBptM1wOb/vgOqt5GDE2OM8TD1Z7Mxyfx6+KXQLJKzr4RcG42PFk0jxkRSg nhR5DN8KmKTaSyaofiJX4SzAErCswYYo6Go+b+GWT9qlxYHkb/7tefJeJ43IYWA6IAo0rJ o6QmG/XZ3W9Baa3oTDvrjiZokyFAKrSXPiqDx8sf8dfVIo+BFquKaZI/MzRusXmiCQOYrH XB7QVYVuNx3Q4R3hsZBzruI+WeDS7csoq9O/ec4p0a1RpaYHXcvu8zwxPHPHlA== From: Jeremy Bryant To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 30.2; Fonts in Emacs 30.2 vs 30.1 Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 21:28:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87plcwtjlp.fsf@jeremybryant.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Received-SPF: pass client-ip=91.218.175.173; envelope-from=jb@jeremybryant.net; helo=out-173.mta0.migadu.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) System: GNU/Linux, compiling Emacs 30.2 from the release tarball. My usual init file loads a font in Emacs 30.1 which isn't found by Emacs 30.2. It appears that the font-family-list is much smaller. This is on the same system. Emacs 30.1: (length (font-family-list)) 3719 Emacs 30.2: (length (font-family-list)) 151 and then (set-frame-font ) says font not available. Is the font subsystem different in 30.2? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 16 02:27:36 2025 Received: (at 79249) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2025 06:27:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40525 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1unAO8-0005DT-4Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 02:27:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33566) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1unAO5-0005DC-1d for 79249@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 02:27:33 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1unANz-0000K4-BG; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 02:27:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=R+M6og2AmebsSuwUjPzT3aNoLFQ2C1QYkEItNSpxpnk=; b=a2OYyLB1PHTL TtYHjQqAg71gvoZudWGFbzibdsebLnkiHVm8V2eLlqVtEQM4rC+yiZBtxSHtkpVNc6UafwpJwAKuc WbK/Z7+EKof2YgQZFgeOjTJ0rWayoOvM8zdssgYISv0y4VBFCfxSUHdd8gm5xVsiVXXlPdpRG52f4 f7pomZYOxQiWGpCIzCf6viNRD8Zfd2JYYylY/MLPta3w4oWvGq7FVjXTqMLsiS1HKeZayLkpO/QD+ y93VVX/7glbIgP1hslqLYpMewBbu9iu52Yf223tXTZfsDdGXLO2vjjHiOL99RCm4Se8BDQOplnxv7 7xAsjK1AyWLu0m2Fy8w9Gw==; Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 09:27:24 +0300 Message-Id: <86ms7zlr1v.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jeremy Bryant In-Reply-To: <87plcwtjlp.fsf@jeremybryant.net> (bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org) Subject: Re: bug#79249: 30.2; Fonts in Emacs 30.2 vs 30.1 References: <87plcwtjlp.fsf@jeremybryant.net> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 79249 Cc: 79249@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 21:28:50 +0100 > From: Jeremy Bryant via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > > System: GNU/Linux, compiling Emacs 30.2 from the release tarball. > > My usual init file loads a font in Emacs 30.1 which isn't found by Emacs > 30.2. > It appears that the font-family-list is much smaller. > This is on the same system. > > Emacs 30.1: > (length (font-family-list)) > 3719 > > Emacs 30.2: > (length (font-family-list)) > 151 Is this in "emacs -Q"? If so, what is your Emacs configuration? You haven't posted any of the details collected by report-emacs-bug about your platform and Emacs build, so it's hard to think about possible reasons. Also, did you build both Emacs 30.1 and 30.2 with the same configure-time options and the same optional features? > Is the font subsystem different in 30.2? It isn't supposed to be different, and on my system I get the same length of the list. Are you sure this is not some local configuration issue related to how Fontconfig (assuming your build uses it) reports fonts to Emacs? Or maybe something changed on your system between these two builds? If nothing else gives a clue, can you bisect on the release branch between the "emacs-30.1" and "emacs-30.2" tags? I've looked at the commit log message and couldn't find any change which could affect that, but maybe it's something completely unintended and not obvious. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 18 16:19:39 2025 Received: (at 79249) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Aug 2025 20:19:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51349 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uo6KR-0007x5-6U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:19:39 -0400 Received: from out-188.mta0.migadu.com ([91.218.175.188]:23203) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uo6KO-0007wa-N7 for 79249@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:19:37 -0400 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jeremybryant.net; s=key1; t=1755548369; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=APXez5p3CcArjwxOQBKPbwdLpeTYyK/giAPrV9LEVjw=; b=EZOGSktFYoVTb/m4zUHsJnDhkDpttX1KhpSLjRxh0YsdDBTGVmI+b3/X9y3yPOdr2Dme0c U/aZZt119yxMKx+XSSL7z3uU9xdX6a4MYZvwL+HW0Y8PWKwfhWxF071xn0ll2mAq8N+eGv oaI9qDk4Mp1jyVKR8xCzrHgr1a3eqPe5UmV4qfd11u4bzb+Fl4IprbTX3Bc3HDDeq9OmkT TPGA2VC5mEXiHi2B0YuueCxn6AuFUQ35A6CPJYbp61S5AkrGQ4tEt1RZnsuXNMITGyyBoW ATQ3NBFY6IQXUQ4NaAK0+e6ZNm3UBIVTS3HpR1PWt4+V2bI996Fian93ueLoHA== From: Jeremy Bryant To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#79249: 30.2; Fonts in Emacs 30.2 vs 30.1 In-Reply-To: <86ms7zlr1v.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 16 Aug 2025 09:27:24 +0300") References: <87plcwtjlp.fsf@jeremybryant.net> <86ms7zlr1v.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 21:19:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87frdos7qn.fsf@jeremybryant.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 79249 Cc: 79249@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Emacs 30.1: >> (length (font-family-list)) >> 3719 >> >> Emacs 30.2: >> (length (font-family-list)) >> 151 > > Is this in "emacs -Q"? If so, what is your Emacs configuration? You > haven't posted any of the details collected by report-emacs-bug about > your platform and Emacs build, so it's hard to think about possible > reasons. True, the initial bug report wasn't complete and truncated due to the mailer. See full details below. > Also, did you build both Emacs 30.1 and 30.2 with the same > configure-time options and the same optional features? Yes, the same. The problem is with emacs -Q It is the same config on both 30.1 and 30.2 ./configure CFLAGS='-O2 -g3' --with-native-compilation=aot --with-x-toolkit=lucid >> Is the font subsystem different in 30.2? > > It isn't supposed to be different, and on my system I get the same > length of the list. > > Are you sure this is not some local configuration issue related to how > Fontconfig (assuming your build uses it) reports fonts to Emacs? Or > maybe something changed on your system between these two builds? What is Fontconfig? Incidentally, I observe, it seems the code font-family-list is frame-specific code, so perhaps so wider frame code was changed. OTOH, it could well be system-specific. The system underwent an upgrade from Debian 12 to Debian 13, otherwise the problem between 30.2 and 30.1 is occurring on this same system. > If nothing else gives a clue, can you bisect on the release branch > between the "emacs-30.1" and "emacs-30.2" tags? I've looked at the > commit log message and couldn't find any change which could affect > that, but maybe it's something completely unintended and not obvious. Thanks, for the ideas, I'll keep investigating. In the meantime, details below. In GNU Emacs 30.2 (build 2, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars) of 2025-08-15 built on Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12101016 System Description: Debian GNU/Linux 13 (trixie) Configured using: 'configure 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g3' --with-native-compilation=aot --with-x-toolkit=lucid' Configured features: ACL DBUS GIF GMP GNUTLS GPM JPEG LIBSELINUX LIBSYSTEMD LIBXML2 MODULES NATIVE_COMP NOTIFY INOTIFY PDUMPER PNG SECCOMP SOUND THREADS TIFF TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS TREE_SITTER WEBP X11 XAW3D XDBE XIM XPM LUCID ZLIB Important settings: value of $LANG: en_GB.UTF-8 value of $XMODIFIERS: @im=ibus locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix Major mode: Lisp Interaction Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t global-eldoc-mode: t () eldoc-mode: t show-paren-mode: t electric-indent-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t minibuffer-regexp-mode: t line-number-mode: t indent-tabs-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow sort mail-extr emacsbug message mailcap yank-media puny dired dired-loaddefs rfc822 mml mml-sec password-cache epa derived epg rfc6068 epg-config gnus-util text-property-search mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader sendmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils time-date subr-x cl-loaddefs cl-lib rmc iso-transl tooltip cconv eldoc paren electric uniquify ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type elisp-mode mwheel term/x-win x-win term/common-win x-dnd touch-screen tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list replace newcomment text-mode lisp-mode prog-mode register page tab-bar menu-bar rfn-eshadow isearch easymenu timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax font-core term/tty-colors frame minibuffer nadvice seq simple cl-generic indonesian philippine cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese eucjp-ms cp51932 hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese composite emoji-zwj charscript charprop case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help abbrev obarray oclosure cl-preloaded button loaddefs theme-loaddefs faces cus-face macroexp files window text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget keymap hashtable-print-readable backquote threads dbusbind inotify dynamic-setting x-toolkit x multi-tty move-toolbar make-network-process native-compile emacs) Memory information: ((conses 16 50465 9464) (symbols 48 5828 0) (strings 32 15059 1743) (string-bytes 1 419662) (vectors 16 9630) (vector-slots 8 164629 10566) (floats 8 24 2) (intervals 56 260 2) (buffers 992 10)) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 19 06:58:30 2025 Received: (at 79249) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Aug 2025 10:58:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53205 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uoK2w-00059w-4W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 06:58:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38392) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uoK2r-00059d-6U for 79249@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 06:58:28 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uoK2h-0002mq-0u; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 06:58:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=wlq0ASN9DMIE9vzz6g0fhox2U9JsLVlfXrPYZK2xA4g=; b=Y0mGH84FUt0x ulRC+l9tX4+Ac5OzqxJNO4JF60KDtbTvg6YmdGxYNS4JR76SLTxvmsCbaeFms7pVf9/5lAYpUW6Qw Ums2tAyzrOm/M33TSFxKP3rRs5ForGjOd0jXNp4lDM34yZ1HiA87vH9wdqpdKOwB05b20RD3c7x3e eWezhxfZnzXqaVFz6JrmuFePWdnfLoWYaXG/I9Dz57fdrlim+QnzSebbBCJIeZAXf/6ku+FozxwfD JL93bRxAgXqqKPhupAPLQDMSFr8FbPuocg+/vt8tiIkbViaSTiv/8JeIzd1rg+NV9BYMRa5vqCK9E gIy0VFLyBYY74XtbJIdybg==; Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 13:57:39 +0300 Message-Id: <86ms7vh93w.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jeremy Bryant In-Reply-To: <87frdos7qn.fsf@jeremybryant.net> (message from Jeremy Bryant on Mon, 18 Aug 2025 21:19:28 +0100) Subject: Re: bug#79249: 30.2; Fonts in Emacs 30.2 vs 30.1 References: <87plcwtjlp.fsf@jeremybryant.net> <86ms7zlr1v.fsf@gnu.org> <87frdos7qn.fsf@jeremybryant.net> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 79249 Cc: 79249@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Jeremy Bryant > Cc: 79249@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 21:19:28 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> Emacs 30.1: > >> (length (font-family-list)) > >> 3719 > >> > >> Emacs 30.2: > >> (length (font-family-list)) > >> 151 > > > > Is this in "emacs -Q"? If so, what is your Emacs configuration? You > > haven't posted any of the details collected by report-emacs-bug about > > your platform and Emacs build, so it's hard to think about possible > > reasons. > > True, the initial bug report wasn't complete and truncated due to the > mailer. See full details below. Hmm... > > Are you sure this is not some local configuration issue related to how > > Fontconfig (assuming your build uses it) reports fonts to Emacs? Or > > maybe something changed on your system between these two builds? > > What is Fontconfig? It's a package that provides a library Emacs uses to access fonts and their properties and capabilities. Given your compiled-in features (see below), I'm not sure your build uses it. > Incidentally, I observe, it seems the code font-family-list is > frame-specific code, so perhaps so wider frame code was changed. Didn't see anything pertinent in that direction, either. > In GNU Emacs 30.2 (build 2, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll > bars) of 2025-08-15 built on > Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12101016 > System Description: Debian GNU/Linux 13 (trixie) > > Configured using: > 'configure 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g3' --with-native-compilation=aot > --with-x-toolkit=lucid' > > Configured features: > ACL DBUS GIF GMP GNUTLS GPM JPEG LIBSELINUX LIBSYSTEMD LIBXML2 MODULES > NATIVE_COMP NOTIFY INOTIFY PDUMPER PNG SECCOMP SOUND THREADS TIFF > TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS TREE_SITTER WEBP X11 XAW3D XDBE XIM XPM LUCID ZLIB ??No HARFBUZZ and no XFT? What does M-: (frame-parameter nil 'font-backend) RET produce? Do you see exactly the same list of features in Emacs 30.1 you have, and the same result of the above evaluation? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 19 16:01:40 2025 Received: (at 79249) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Aug 2025 20:01:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54998 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uoSWa-0002o8-AJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 16:01:40 -0400 Received: from out-178.mta1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:203:375::b2]:29897) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uoSWV-0002nl-RU for 79249@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 16:01:38 -0400 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jeremybryant.net; s=key1; t=1755633688; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZHY+snmYMk2e13D1jbSVs0L42nybVwds2H23cCVfiOk=; b=ZvmNhNk3iRL/X4k4fwRwklIDpNw9CULz0cx3AeFGrZR+vO4REsojTQwmFZcbq+/c9m6KDc t/8dCH7r6F7MhL4BukEHtR6b2bJgc0VNERF3YUkww9jZ1Ymh3JaRP4NSO7Amr63RrUmy0q tzNa1uXAFIhiHEFyxGxyJmvb5vlsVwHeXlxqsIQ+D35yOsQdbVyJYG4z0GQBGOBFmSaMJZ itWlzQ5MhAjg1Xvo9oWbQ2qCrfM8XZuRCUJlNhTPd3FvP79ETGWiBFt3r1+eH4KVnlhwJJ E+AtB0H5j4LeLtnoPHA1bRs+Im6zZtrP/3wX4mQhMcW52JGO+oKHoEpnazBapg== From: Jeremy Bryant To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#79249: 30.2; Fonts in Emacs 30.2 vs 30.1 In-Reply-To: <86ms7vh93w.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 19 Aug 2025 13:57:39 +0300") References: <87plcwtjlp.fsf@jeremybryant.net> <86ms7zlr1v.fsf@gnu.org> <87frdos7qn.fsf@jeremybryant.net> <86ms7vh93w.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:01:21 +0100 Message-ID: <87v7mjqdwu.fsf@jeremybryant.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 79249 Cc: 79249@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Configured features: >> ACL DBUS GIF GMP GNUTLS GPM JPEG LIBSELINUX LIBSYSTEMD LIBXML2 MODULES >> NATIVE_COMP NOTIFY INOTIFY PDUMPER PNG SECCOMP SOUND THREADS TIFF >> TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS TREE_SITTER WEBP X11 XAW3D XDBE XIM XPM LUCID ZLIB > > ??No HARFBUZZ and no XFT? What does > > M-: (frame-parameter nil 'font-backend) RET > > produce? Do you see exactly the same list of features in Emacs 30.1 > you have, and the same result of the above evaluation? Thanks for the suggestion, indeed I compared both results and there were some missing build dependencies (which did include harfbuzz, thanks). Ultimately this was not a bug. Closing. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 19 16:03:58 2025 Received: (at 79249) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Aug 2025 20:03:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55007 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uoSYo-0002sL-7W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 16:03:58 -0400 Received: from out-188.mta0.migadu.com ([91.218.175.188]:47223) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uoSYm-0002s3-1e for 79249@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 16:03:56 -0400 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jeremybryant.net; s=key1; t=1755633819; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=J8CtcI9mG1hYFO1bGkcFHM5kFhnh4B4Uetf+bWPkixY=; b=cbZWxAKSrPelb9cdYPMtrGRaRgTHFTjcRRaL9Rhe3nIuErmZlLWyygpxwuE8ZOW+WlWzAs XLdDLdLexDJPn+O6PGFHnbC1LohiQhTofP9OabqFmKYatDLNwcSUJlA9GjV6j6/a/Ft+Zz hhF/aF/rDF3jEU81Y6VJ84nUgccrT1NOW6ylaklVlG8jhF1X9uA11pmtmMMXei1H6JCOTS ZsDIFit2PRvPk3rBINPQXhbjVcPuquFE3C6KUWDKq4RxVpFk81Xa1YyuwBSernm295wBW9 CkrYwfD9uu8OEQyxl7qH+9C/TQ73d6e0pJoAgMwyiA73UIM1r0k7+PHTvowNgw== From: Jeremy Bryant To: Eli Zaretskii , 79249-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#79249: 30.2; Fonts in Emacs 30.2 vs 30.1 In-Reply-To: <87v7mjqdwu.fsf@jeremybryant.net> (Jeremy Bryant's message of "Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:01:21 +0100") References: <87plcwtjlp.fsf@jeremybryant.net> <86ms7zlr1v.fsf@gnu.org> <87frdos7qn.fsf@jeremybryant.net> <86ms7vh93w.fsf@gnu.org> <87v7mjqdwu.fsf@jeremybryant.net> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:03:38 +0100 Message-ID: <87ms7vqdt1.fsf@jeremybryant.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 79249 Cc: 79249@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Jeremy Bryant writes: > Ultimately this was not a bug. > > Closing.