Subject: bug#79249: closed (Re: bug#79249: 30.2; Fonts in Emacs 30.2 vs 30.1)

From: [email-masked] (GNU bug Tracking System)
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 20:04:03 +0000

Your bug report

#79249: 30.2; Fonts in Emacs 30.2 vs 30.1

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to [email-masked].

-- 
79249: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=79249
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact [email-masked] with problems

Subject: Re: bug#79249: 30.2; Fonts in Emacs 30.2 vs 30.1
From: Jeremy Bryant <[email-masked]>
To: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:03:38 +0100
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

Jeremy Bryant <[email-masked]> writes:

> Ultimately this was not a bug.
>
> Closing.

Subject: 30.2; Fonts in Emacs 30.2 vs 30.1
From: Jeremy Bryant <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 21:28:50 +0100
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

System: GNU/Linux, compiling Emacs 30.2 from the release tarball.

My usual init file loads a font in Emacs 30.1 which isn't found by Emacs
30.2.
It appears that the font-family-list is much smaller.
This is on the same system.

Emacs 30.1:
(length (font-family-list))
3719

Emacs 30.2:
(length (font-family-list))
151

and then (set-frame-font ) says font not available.

Is the font subsystem different in 30.2?