From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 24 01:13:41 2025 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jul 2025 05:13:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53922 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ueoGz-0006nb-2q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 01:13:41 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:45914) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ueoGv-0006n8-0M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 01:13:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ueoGm-0000Na-C4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 01:13:29 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ueoGj-0005Z2-WB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 01:13:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmx.net; s=s31663417; t=1753334003; x=1753938803; i=jimjoe@gmx.net; bh=EixD1iabyw6VcRBECjDSnSHlzJHdlAfqHWKLrUkHtbc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from: message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject:to; b=fXRYZrCjFeXUm8aQNnr1uzmQuDmxU/KVO+gIusvFMf5xHJBAK9G8vazzWwLqPBRT wOj6tA9ikEhrxNob2bxy40+evT3jGjHtjJUJz8MnFwgYevAoNg1oyNjs8eQHYFUZU jq/F5IlPrwr2xbWfqUgL0gMQYhlTvXehhVn45XaVO60JM43zl/71J2MHl1IU9s3EJ rvA1CPb7RzMCpVZjOUVCvLE+ggOx6aVtKxsNZy1rOC1aaTbIs3L9YvEhMz7xkDqxE o/KrQhZQQeM5l/P5pPP0Lcesn2Q/w0RidV68T8eHanQLSsGfv3ddYlFG/wo4lDxdn VSnQFBb9b3gRG4sWeg== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Received: from inspiron15 ([42.108.29.104]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MjS54-1uH4IK1kCI-00pSEC for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 07:13:23 +0200 From: James Thomas To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer X-Debbugs-Cc: mvoteiza@udel.edu monnier@iro.umontreal.ca manuel@ledu-giraud.fr Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 10:43:07 +0530 Message-ID: <8734am41ek.fsf@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:EV1QRyXPdp3sZmd58pENMd7vXBokNp+scM3eEhXKqub02jYalOn bDlhEaoZgDF8Yc4r1YVvxp50RFxyV5zkCgXs6JleK2Ja7HHL3+XmlkKx1R1CBzzbvBj3Rci 01zKkg+FbQJsUDaacU9iYqk6yUWiY1DVTLt1ZMDPfho/D8yHYpWmEI3B+nbnJbZO7N/SHam vrzbM8Q1v5m0rHjOXF6RA== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:TNQ9GzW957E=;4tS34D2iWRyALCHhF2M8Ufo7vRg t0Oz1NN0SmhGsTP1USWPKBPsBnE5jQFX42R4Oc5qr7+860L9O22Nw2qKfdrp3BhxEtR97X9rl ap1+Rh+w6Hhvim28CjXe8pFFw2OLctg6p/LOBbccebYUEinODxJM7wQ+NZCfKeTMxjaaRwJIW rwqM6vh7FUzOukZ7A0s/MrkqIWZIp4km9oaOoflORLlra+qVEUaiEn9Ait79VcTZrto417qja Rn6if2iwNCDbHNKhIB03pT2p4Ygv91PMIWZFnzkRpN+7vK8FIwxwzIKYf1fy76d6S1+5OhAfT zs0wLSoIjac2dmOa24q5NY55jy+POvziisZRgXZkrs+kMam8U9D8sXFkmHFzLCtHu+7bXgLhd fbrUCkR4posLRg/tJq+qwJMpqh5IWplknEzjMu8N5C7C+6Tw7PcHRa99rr89tG5d3HxR8CNTh NNdogJPK4Oys7TOeNBK1JbWfoWLPGz9BP4AknOHpkpW9h9lsr8Fwe/xZiKE8QISvDnzvjUO85 ItaHxrCOe0iWBrdnU5XoB2WZJTZg1gFR505QHkjzIfxju5WmiaKeO6CrqAgynKalb/2DstaSg vEaGrGS+JEv9R5hcE4ir6K4uMnnidYpG8ssHHkjMf+6S4pW9r1WMoUGgk/sCNPdzWKNTa0KZ/ p2Azrnpkoj27Fid8whONqobQmxvuoaAEzCYXBrkw11XLdNnfbOm3b5kLjgrhlgLR+4YvqZEEO Wa+6I4Mnk3/GEl6o6uzhGg56Ei1JS1ukXmVYbn3dWLoDqPo51SnaE7qjIVlh/iyGLMO4stmro w5aJ9WetFkYRP7a0HmYBrM9JJ8L78Q0MA7NBOBNgUlyzwgLEE9Om7Xl18a8gHwAW7pz/q7jhB exFvVnVI62r6ZlmEbM8oZXCcMCe4O7LnGnpxdYbGV9AoFWEXQx9VCPCPo7BlXj9zvP24+V7Me 5Q1LqeFEbVZFyV2FdpFF2z2IqZI+3kpt7wMmY5I3wf9P2heSrsfMUMKtGuDqQFQfDe1RNB5iR 69PV3b/O/H2P4dxvzKt9qF3S6TewreJBoY0o0J+su/q9naysCPYLDBq7asWvGtew4lqC46sLs y4UnazxZmZQWtGVa45SKpIcgoY6l5Xqhwoa/MPXku/H8sQP5+9m31NMkQvXsNyeD+mNXwaZSX i6sTOLKJE3vvdXhwq2Ld90SDfv/zWQHPzauWWrGTtZvjqGYrOEcp9jMgKpTZ0GrUnjMQ9/Fj2 TU0Puip2o58tnr7XJjtraXx8YwHa1NquhMeWVCnb5e2lF2dxHmEygP6udJ2CeoducX3YwPrr2 YgDiVr8B4Kl9/tqukcEaCrGvhkfcYWU8Bgsn6j9RuJ/zQoUd0msZf3VmLFSNLsHqJGMQnyC/C 0yEh9yOmzryHlke6SXSJw7a6s2KXs6JHqGUophYMP3vQkg8VMPM3m5hK1g7L1KHzJEcFJDRoQ rUl0F4YUHVfMN+sM2uoSDCKF9PM4DvNj68YMESDOYtn8Yv6PLw9xVoPRSpHhHP/ohALzPbStO xpavbCclghgY/oathu8smvYv/d14+EdHgswkhugceH2hNeiNE4JviX8Cx86rP8w90ydTSjtWo W7sq5hwpxVSlBHzpZp0+V/mSjOviPgvmMvj9lM453mbUooPIe4QTJOuqvv2aYDYhoMrtH9Ym+ 7nCxW/9j2fLr8UPSOZ8CIRb+kIIm8xQEZ3SFn16Ct2Je3QzWuuj/COPIp4L8O5QK58t/840hW uJzFH9DzL6rWPMWpZeV+JKcCeNAb0Y+whD559vIDqzVFc33amZD/LlqAHI/UknkNjwTWDyUR7 gWtE9yfOFIjtw9B1znaIJ5efyEqKh6yruIpE2Y26WBzzyW7kn6tggXmZRKPMs2VskUEBZ92YS s42xL6mSN2L/stuS3YhasU9oSX8IOHHHYwLALNtdlm6Wd6VB6CK9YWHddxzs5VeSwK+gZDl1q eh9tCPxaTZT4Q4xGXMNSdTwwUAJujx18jm1I2NthcQ8hcvEPNrrAYLs5kzrKzg4OrsGiTkf5c n6jRz6VCkElGE79AQLhSW/FeO1Twy1xsmRh9KZELo2LEUW0BYZFCSCTpDPw2H3uEY4oYutAJ4 f7v2nf2BGMw1dwSGWP/gDfZlB2g8ss4WDGmjiOQdn8vRabzR+Omc4x9lw2gcHT5M0aXs2/faw 8M+s9lEGojyPbtlkZ5ikJz/li0inLOR+6ZSJS7wvAyylBmFoOnLVC1umELCKDAcFa4ScBlRXO C0lNmJ0n3oydUsROdH0T7QtvxFuZGVKF7MkHwk/BRI02V5Qck2cJkwue46JfUG/PW1Z5YQTFx h8UGz1BR93kr81C+na6gkt7V/EHnW8Xp0beNerdHijqlT4JeDzWN7wTvuB0MoQN+ItbbgDv3Q 4gbaV9o3xAk1/NzwrPvstuDhpLVlcBsx57jsNdAannKnNzeiAOJnmOVn0qs1n+VQ4AiwSkua3 5Is1t8nmfS5XdmycqIqPYT7i7eiNeaZA5AQ7AEuSP7qfx/qnohuBqN9kqaiVB9Gf0nWS3wEaC xvRD2Z4KcbiMyeoj37OXidN1gbYn9RnTDXnqg6R+gVduMjIbHqnwyejGNiGQ+V36duKTj69h6 eOIKPlNikoeXbgUuObMgUJ7SX7+6LqCDqtVOIqF2DIs9Fki01Lxlx1XG7o6HBSniy2b0cskD+ ZUksf7ZDvjLqX/0H5A4PvI/D2RdxqDHpZRYj/c9IWhJAtd6zJPlvLQeN37BvUV5eciLSHzd2L AfLGp6Meuo/fXQr0ywIrkwKS8id73Kwc/hki0KKLiLQ63vhjwZE5j6SO2SzKCbkYjwC/vH2R0 3+KkujKBfy1L8ZfWmG5jCu3cEd6AJ/nGzKtlYRtgEpRWtQOTGjbsXI/VG4DTLt0Y3ktWNPoct nne/eRFdgZ9n6RHXaPHWGKxsuZZs+ptl5JAHUlRQ436n5E/81mX8F/oZS3r6NIqwfOKQ82Rhe YA7rdw8eg6X9Fug3kCaJXycRJE7xKAvzYS0el6dXhoZ7B7/t/7CHvkSQjx8PthwpneG3oIJhZ bXeHDN0CoAZurulhiFZotjlij34+/VhANi9YYUaeQzOxmSw9Hj5GHb1aRoi4cmfunB0g+yrej a1/UHMLkzlKwKBRihGc6yZicTe4VLTBSBkagXLpqZT9jdXdUqSSh9JZJmQqnFU/KZiNUti+nY Tgx93zAZBGXbqEQAdaTOb4vd/UpK4YWbZ3NAJlJccEmtwQbFeompK1arp9Wna7LXkH1B6pa4c vosDYv2yHqd6ohc7LeRLg1/LtOrFnS7MsxCRwP3qnfxD+KjeL+qaI7GX75ozggQ1PLpY3B7Fn 9ZDwZaEL1093+FckQY8WYefhvKK5IKujYcoA8HOHbiI5yAP+vszH3kBH/bbSwsMcxCqu7b2Iq Nvjx3A00k8KzQcUcD2my9R+lKpAjC13Fa8R5EjOgZwuy0eLCHQ1VAdH5D3WKgnTuswrY6VasQ 21lzeaJJOCO9CjvoTUDt9UaOGAxiFnaU2312f7lTFOBxdvtxs6RXV+B1ZuX3E6mh47E+LLHq4 fvPsFuhzM7cgF904wl+H+o6rOS3xlGn69pH96aRLXNZnjAW+ptjFxOWHzNLpzhCh3HREagsrD ZuG32sAY9DEI7a5i3GZQQkM9lnS6bhustXi Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.22; envelope-from=jimjoe@gmx.net; helo=mout.gmx.net X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 3.6 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Severity: wishlist Tags: patch The original reason for the 'nreverse' seems to have been for cycling using 's RET s RET...' ala ERC (bug#22244) - that won't, obviously, work with this put in - but the 'right' way to allow doing tha [...] Content analysis details: (3.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jimjoe[at]gmx.net) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 T_SPF_PERMERROR SPF: test of record failed (permerror) 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [42.108.29.104 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2001:470:142:0:0:0:0:17 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Severity: wishlist Tags: patch The original reason for the 'nreverse' seems to have been for cycling using 's RET s RET...' ala ERC (bug#22244) - that won't, obviously, work with this put in - but the 'right' way to allow doing tha [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [42.108.29.104 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2001:470:142:0:0:0:0:17 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jimjoe[at]gmx.net) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 T_SPF_PERMERROR SPF: test of record failed (permerror) -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Severity: wishlist Tags: patch The original reason for the 'nreverse' seems to have been for cycling using 's RET s RET...' ala ERC (bug#22244) - that won't, obviously, work with this put in - but the 'right' way to allow doing that would be by giving it a more specific 'category' (describe-variable 'completion-extra-properties), isn't it? --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0001-lisp-net-eww-el--eww-switch-to-buffer---Use-norm.patch Content-Description: [PATCH] * lisp/net/eww.el (eww-switch-to-buffer): Use normal buffer Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =46rom 192966ce939919767dce155787ff98cd5c1deccd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Thomas Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:21:04 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] * lisp/net/eww.el (eww-switch-to-buffer): Use normal buff= er order. =2D-- lisp/net/eww.el | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lisp/net/eww.el b/lisp/net/eww.el index cdddfe3700e..bfc57c9181b 100644 =2D-- a/lisp/net/eww.el +++ b/lisp/net/eww.el @@ -2397,7 +2397,7 @@ eww-switch-to-buffer "Prompt for an EWW buffer to display in the selected window. If no such buffer exist, fallback to calling `eww'." (interactive nil eww-mode) - (let ((list (cl-loop for buf in (nreverse (buffer-list)) + (let ((list (cl-loop for buf in (buffer-list) if (and (eww--buffer-p buf) (not (eq buf (current-buffer)))) collect (buffer-name buf)))) =2D-=20 2.50.0 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain And, in that case, why not get rid of the cl- as well? --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0002-Prefer-seq--functions-to-cl--in-eww-switch-to-buff.patch Content-Description: [PATCH] Prefer seq- functions to cl- in eww-switch-to-buffer Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =46rom 5c111c0d44eb08030df69a79da344b7e1a7a32ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Thomas Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:28:58 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] Prefer seq- functions to cl- in eww-switch-to-buffer Prefer seq- functions to cl- in eww-switch-to-buffer * lisp/net/eww.el (eww-switch-to-buffer): =2D-- lisp/net/eww.el | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/net/eww.el b/lisp/net/eww.el index bfc57c9181b..74e9491c2c9 100644 =2D-- a/lisp/net/eww.el +++ b/lisp/net/eww.el @@ -2397,23 +2397,23 @@ eww-switch-to-buffer "Prompt for an EWW buffer to display in the selected window. If no such buffer exist, fallback to calling `eww'." (interactive nil eww-mode) - (let ((list (cl-loop for buf in (buffer-list) - if (and (eww--buffer-p buf) - (not (eq buf (current-buffer)))) - collect (buffer-name buf)))) + (let ((list (seq-filter + (lambda (buf) + (and (eww--buffer-p buf) (not (eq buf (current-buffer)))= )) + (buffer-list)))) (if list (pop-to-buffer-same-window (if (length=3D list 1) (car list) (completing-read "Switch to EWW buffer: " (completion-table-with-metadata - list + (mapcar #'buffer-name list) `((category . buffer) (annotation-function . ,(lambda (buf) (with-current-buffer buf (format " %s" (eww-current-url))))= ))) - nil t))) + nil t nil nil (car-safe list)))) (call-interactively #'eww)))) =20 (defun eww-toggle-fonts () =2D-=20 2.50.0 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain -- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 02 10:03:22 2025 Received: (at 79084) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2025 14:03:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36759 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uiCpV-0002ZF-Ki for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Aug 2025 10:03:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44180) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uiCpT-0002Ys-2F for 79084@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Aug 2025 10:03:19 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uiCpN-0006a3-4z; Sat, 02 Aug 2025 10:03:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=nZ6RQ9VrG8I4J/aKA4SxYCB1avp2/KYgBxURjH+xy5Q=; b=j6MxPtW63L5j 0E0aCLcG0G5cAMqddWCmlVsxcZbge3AzROG5tYxxJG/Zoo2M8iPteOhidDFeJ0YfPqFi1tekDavN9 hBQq7M0iZ4SL9j1Jh6aKUSd/+qv4HmXk/tSOgx87UTEeiCYR9fgfLBe5jRWV1NT5nKF7SM5b9qFNL cKk5xcFP4oWARr0bEnXi4Ke/FhbgP1EhmO5u6tfkUXyaps7G5mAzhafgSNzIEQUAJh9c7wT5vJIM0 3RzGbyaPmNLtn+jEknF+YQJZsV0WSywQJOhRTwqHatMDiSw1XWvCDb8fp8FujEQVP+hoc1YKvL2ds SoFbz5+rHsp5dnX2HnC98Q==; Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 17:03:10 +0300 Message-Id: <86plddrfc1.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: James Thomas In-Reply-To: <8734am41ek.fsf@gmx.net> (bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org) Subject: Re: bug#79084: [PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer References: <8734am41ek.fsf@gmx.net> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 79084 Cc: mvoteiza@udel.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, manuel@ledu-giraud.fr, 79084@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Cc: mvoteiza@udel.edu monnier@iro.umontreal.ca manuel@ledu-giraud.fr > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 10:43:07 +0530 > From: James Thomas via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > The original reason for the 'nreverse' seems to have been for cycling > using 's RET s RET...' ala ERC (bug#22244) - that won't, obviously, work > with this put in - but the 'right' way to allow doing that would be by > giving it a more specific 'category' (describe-variable > 'completion-extra-properties), isn't it? Resending after fixing the CC'ed people, in the hope they will have comments. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 16 06:36:02 2025 Received: (at 79084) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2025 10:36:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41161 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1unEGX-0007Bb-Pa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 06:36:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34828) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1unEGV-0007BH-JT for 79084@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 06:36:00 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1unEGP-00043R-0E; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 06:35:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=BE8fT2oFtG1pKgBANI+AW/lu0gYTM1EF0e0uvYXxEPU=; b=CgAZS+Qjwny0 SGzkYrCCoAUteW7WOIqWSoxZ3TLksSutJHFILLvOAA7HrNy8DA3qgLeyjABuMZeTJzvYKFh0aMVp6 uQcUjxAVv688+f4tNC5F/HLxbaTiE5NVUk5YMrCr/5//OSLp70JtCpMNhe3LpNW595rmp0UbbMjj2 jivrASRqWdqja+1HUkg1v4VDDkT1tCSgOja+ZmP9zMNkgZCQ+37TDvZ24Q0V4ScarPh685f0Rp07T +fKXDFK6/SNvhYcKSmAGxDaQDdL/HKUoZtas2rLBuS153f2j21l2/B4+JXurxVieXI2PbM+DuAhjv 0fLBJB+yWG50JEXoHjpgKw==; Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 13:35:50 +0300 Message-Id: <861ppblfjt.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: jimjoe@gmx.net, mvoteiza@udel.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, manuel@ledu-giraud.fr In-Reply-To: <86plddrfc1.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 02 Aug 2025 17:03:10 +0300) Subject: Re: bug#79084: [PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer References: <8734am41ek.fsf@gmx.net> <86plddrfc1.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 79084 Cc: 79084@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Ping! Would people please respond so we could make progress in this matter? > Cc: mvoteiza@udel.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, manuel@ledu-giraud.fr, > 79084@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 17:03:10 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > > > Cc: mvoteiza@udel.edu monnier@iro.umontreal.ca manuel@ledu-giraud.fr > > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 10:43:07 +0530 > > From: James Thomas via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > > > Severity: wishlist > > Tags: patch > > > > The original reason for the 'nreverse' seems to have been for cycling > > using 's RET s RET...' ala ERC (bug#22244) - that won't, obviously, work > > with this put in - but the 'right' way to allow doing that would be by > > giving it a more specific 'category' (describe-variable > > 'completion-extra-properties), isn't it? > > Resending after fixing the CC'ed people, in the hope they will have > comments. > > > > From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 30 03:57:58 2025 Received: (at 79084) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Aug 2025 07:57:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44540 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1usGTF-0005tK-92 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2025 03:57:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36326) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1usGTB-0005rv-KX for 79084@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2025 03:57:55 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1usGT4-0006Xb-Q1; Sat, 30 Aug 2025 03:57:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=steIiraKH9nrUgG/V3lc9cVnbpvf78bgiWIkrfsa8Xs=; b=ErAo4/R4V2GB VCNwEDEyIavYFQA/J6tOwpFEvXU+4cl/s6y7oywocBRjxxGOgne4BJezKQOF3WTW833/+wXvBjoDV dUlHZHO0hQ8HcvVjgr8t6dCeRoZbx/QlLYS4U7OoaPSckawaKFZDc8Hr56hqdW5LiUdQvF+KYO/nG G6YHStzklNJMWwsXf+tQeqKRUJBxfLVhLfasanz8IirHFbJuuwwvcu2T+LPtSdNKG6+4eXfjctuXC mq8xYO/nRCOBb5mJltMOJ/4jXBNLAQHfBpGqn9P4TyPzghuFGQp0B6DZqC7tmepJJVzQgsMuRPoUc e2WY7Ct/OgSuzW0i0EMrVw==; Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 10:57:38 +0300 Message-Id: <86ldn1qm19.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: jimjoe@gmx.net, mvoteiza@udel.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, manuel@ledu-giraud.fr In-Reply-To: <861ppblfjt.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 16 Aug 2025 13:35:50 +0300) Subject: Re: bug#79084: [PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer References: <8734am41ek.fsf@gmx.net> <86plddrfc1.fsf@gnu.org> <861ppblfjt.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 79084 Cc: 79084@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Ping! Ping! Could people please chime in? > Cc: 79084@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 13:35:50 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > > Ping! Would people please respond so we could make progress in this > matter? > > > Cc: mvoteiza@udel.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, manuel@ledu-giraud.fr, > > 79084@debbugs.gnu.org > > Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 17:03:10 +0300 > > From: Eli Zaretskii > > > > > Cc: mvoteiza@udel.edu monnier@iro.umontreal.ca manuel@ledu-giraud.fr > > > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 10:43:07 +0530 > > > From: James Thomas via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > > > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > > > > > Severity: wishlist > > > Tags: patch > > > > > > The original reason for the 'nreverse' seems to have been for cycling > > > using 's RET s RET...' ala ERC (bug#22244) - that won't, obviously, work > > > with this put in - but the 'right' way to allow doing that would be by > > > giving it a more specific 'category' (describe-variable > > > 'completion-extra-properties), isn't it? > > > > Resending after fixing the CC'ed people, in the hope they will have > > comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 13 03:47:07 2025 Received: (at 79084) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2025 07:47:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53042 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uxKyR-0000Zh-G5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Sep 2025 03:47:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33698) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uxKyP-0000ZC-NI for 79084@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Sep 2025 03:47:06 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uxKy9-0001dG-SR; Sat, 13 Sep 2025 03:46:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=ZXt4VwT2TbCiWGLgGdeBfXew+taHpmrXIAvS+PbOSeA=; b=Fl0l3j/j/ZK4 jyKdsfuahF25Wu8jcpriAiXw5q3jY6OPV/+zNv7cb3QdrYhYV/hkXunvJF7dhULgwOueuHeLBSglh mKbjy6ivzl6V7QDkem91vrnv+/3KmAqHrY+vggb3ssbjtWAcnkDoZaD6gv0lUNcQkT4YnUg52iuR5 Upz4qyFSf2IHxNie2oyu+ZPP0i40/LPXiUmSr4yKVaPTw8XqDAhEw/IzFWgYAPYxBKqHS3s16xi5u 1JeJEas0WspV95Fcm7UtNVgtQzpeZcf2XpgIEh/luunMdPSb4JK24VhiFgAfsIBO3o1yrhXy86HlS pmp4TlNHBMqOHRievqcbQw==; Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 10:46:45 +0300 Message-Id: <86bjnesska.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: jimjoe@gmx.net, mvoteiza@udel.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, manuel@ledu-giraud.fr In-Reply-To: <86ldn1qm19.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 30 Aug 2025 10:57:38 +0300) Subject: Re: bug#79084: [PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer References: <8734am41ek.fsf@gmx.net> <86plddrfc1.fsf@gnu.org> <861ppblfjt.fsf@gnu.org> <86ldn1qm19.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 79084 Cc: 79084@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Ping! Ping! Ping! Still waiting for people to respond and help making progress with this issue. > Cc: 79084@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 10:57:38 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > > Ping! Ping! Could people please chime in? > > > Cc: 79084@debbugs.gnu.org > > Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 13:35:50 +0300 > > From: Eli Zaretskii > > > > Ping! Would people please respond so we could make progress in this > > matter? > > > > > Cc: mvoteiza@udel.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, manuel@ledu-giraud.fr, > > > 79084@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 17:03:10 +0300 > > > From: Eli Zaretskii > > > > > > > Cc: mvoteiza@udel.edu monnier@iro.umontreal.ca manuel@ledu-giraud.fr > > > > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 10:43:07 +0530 > > > > From: James Thomas via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > > > > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > > > > > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Tags: patch > > > > > > > > The original reason for the 'nreverse' seems to have been for cycling > > > > using 's RET s RET...' ala ERC (bug#22244) - that won't, obviously, work > > > > with this put in - but the 'right' way to allow doing that would be by > > > > giving it a more specific 'category' (describe-variable > > > > 'completion-extra-properties), isn't it? > > > > > > Resending after fixing the CC'ed people, in the hope they will have > > > comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 13 18:32:27 2025 Received: (at 79084-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2025 22:32:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57656 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uxYnC-0004nN-Rv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Sep 2025 18:32:27 -0400 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:54732) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1uxYn2-0004lm-Ik for 79084-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Sep 2025 18:32:22 -0400 Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6CC491000BC; Sat, 13 Sep 2025 18:32:09 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1757802728; bh=cP1SkDCd2B9JS7el9AOkjv7WPJZ4Rhkr07XWf0DCAMY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=okV/LPwQ6QyXNc53nXUKZPFBgsJ6M+uWPtt9etYWh54BF609aeMyVcC88ixmR0eNK 1TO3EODJLD3hMRXdQoUoUOnFlpwenehWx8PItBOyaWOGBW+iEYKEluWymMZ/QXfIVt N4EUh0oUZf7U3WnJnH+1FXDl4iHYPcveRQKtVvLY0ZiI20tjh7vWsWP4KSTKgV6UgZ Pf2AtweNnVcwAS0JfuLs2t5NpwIwGURWLUCIGVco5MxLGdWL40tNffu7zIlRzk1/Az QrXKokA1IR5jI+pv0LcZGer7cWUCYb5/W+avp2NQRSDjmCwNynDHbi435vyCB/wcWO iBfL7SOOQaNoQ== Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9ECD4100029; Sat, 13 Sep 2025 18:32:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pastel (unknown [104.247.225.131]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D95312022C; Sat, 13 Sep 2025 18:32:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: James Thomas Subject: Re: bug#79084: [PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer In-Reply-To: <8734am41ek.fsf@gmx.net> Message-ID: References: <8734am41ek.fsf@gmx.net> Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 18:32:07 -0400 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL -0.254 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 79084-done Cc: mvoteiza@udel.edu, 79084-done@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, manuel@ledu-giraud.fr X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > The original reason for the 'nreverse' seems to have been for cycling > using 's RET s RET...' ala ERC (bug#22244) - that won't, obviously, work > with this put in - but the 'right' way to allow doing that would be by > giving it a more specific 'category' (describe-variable > 'completion-extra-properties), isn't it? Indeed. > And, in that case, why not get rid of the cl- as well? Fine by me, pushed to `master`, thank you. Stefan