GNU bug report logs -
#79082
30.1; [reproducibility] sysinfo call during profile dump
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 2025/07/29 14:26:43 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> I'm not sure we can rely on that. Some future change might call it
> more than once, in which case it will return the same value and could
> break something.
>
> So I would prefer making such changes where the time value is used in
> a way that it makes the build not reproducible, instead of changing a
> low-level function that can be used in other context.
Is there any way to remember which value will be stored in the final
(p)dump image? Like set a mark/tag in the Lisp Cons or Lisp Float to
not to dump such values into the resulting (p)dump images?
>
> > In my spec file I use the line
> >
> > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH="$(sed -n '/^----/n;s/ - .*$//;p;q' emacs.changes| date -u -f - +%%s)"
> > export SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
> >
> > with the changelog which gets added to the spec file.
>
> Isn't this completely unportable?
Sorry but this is the defacto standard to get reproducible builds, see
https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/source-date-epoch/
and any distribution depends on it. On how SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is
determined is an other story. I've choosen the latest changelog
entry as this is here the last change before a package gets
submitted to QA staging area. Means no changes of the package
will results in a reproducible build on every rebuild.
Werner
--
"Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having
a peeing section in a swimming pool." -- Edward Burr
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 10 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.