GNU bug report logs - #79036
[PATCH] Fix pdb tracking for remote filenames

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Liu Hui <liuhui1610 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 04:59:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Full log


Message #14 received at 79036 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
Cc: liuhui1610 <at> gmail.com, 79036 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#79036: [PATCH] Fix pdb tracking for remote filenames
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 10:47:53 +0300
> From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
> Cc: Liu Hui <liuhui1610 <at> gmail.com>,  79036 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 08:47:08 +0200
> 
> >> diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/python.el b/lisp/progmodes/python.el
> >> index f4f0518dbfd..59977fcb49f 100644
> >> --- a/lisp/progmodes/python.el
> >> +++ b/lisp/progmodes/python.el
> >> @@ -5079,8 +5079,10 @@ python-pdbtrack-set-tracked-buffer
> >>    "Set the buffer for FILE-NAME as the tracked buffer.
> >>  Internally it uses the `python-pdbtrack-tracked-buffer' variable.
> >>  Returns the tracked buffer."
> >> -  (let* ((file-name-prospect (concat (file-remote-p default-directory)
> >> -                              file-name))
> >> +  (let* ((file-name-prospect (if (file-remote-p file-name)
> >> +                                 file-name
> >> +                               (concat (file-remote-p default-directory)
> >> +                                       file-name)))
> >>           (file-buffer (get-file-buffer file-name-prospect)))
> >>      (unless file-buffer
> >>        (cond
> >
> > Shouldn't this code use 'expand-file-name' instead?  Using 'concat' to
> > construct file names is a bug waiting to happen, IME.
> 
> `expand-file-name' wouldn't work if file-name is an absolute file name.

I guess I'm missing something: doesn't this code want to produce an
absolute file name?  If not, what does it try to do?

> `file-remote-p' is designed to cooperate with `concat'. It mentions it
> in its docstring.

So you agree with the patch?  It looks strange to me that we should
use file-remote-p in the branch where it is known that FILE-NAME is
not a remote file name.




This bug report was last modified 2 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.