GNU bug report logs -
#79036
[PATCH] Fix pdb tracking for remote filenames
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
kobarity wrote:
>
> Liu Hui wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 3, 2025 at 7:47 PM kobarity <kobarity <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > From: Liu Hui <liuhui1610 <at> gmail.com>
> > > > > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 08:45:54 +0800
> > > > > Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, michael.albinus <at> gmx.de, 79036 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 11:08 PM kobarity <kobarity <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > For non-file buffers, could it return buffer name instead of <string>?
> > > > > > > e.g. #<buffer NAME> or #<NAME> where NAME may need to be quoted. Then
> > > > > > > python-pdbtrack-set-tracked-buffer can find it by (get-buffer-create
> > > > > > > "NAME").
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That might be a good idea. Why is `get-buffer-create' is necessary
> > > > > > rather than `get-buffer'?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for pointing it out. get-buffer should be used here.
> > > >
> > > > So can we please have an updated patch for this?
> > >
> > > Since it is an improvement to add a new feature and not a fix for
> > > #79036, I think it would be better to separate the patches.
> > >
> > > Attached is my proposed patch to fix #79036.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I find python-shell-send-file has the same issue as
> > python-shell-send-string, and
> > needs to use correct file-name too.
>
> Thanks, I will update the patch.
Attached is the revised patch to fix #79036.
[0001-Fix-Python-PDB-tracking-for-remote-inferior-Python.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
This bug report was last modified 2 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.