GNU bug report logs - #79036
[PATCH] Fix pdb tracking for remote filenames

Previous Next

Full log

Message #134 received at 79036 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: kobarity <kobarity <at> gmail.com>
To: Liu Hui <liuhui1610 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 79036 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, michael.albinus <at> gmx.de
Subject: Re: bug#79036: [PATCH] Fix pdb tracking for remote filenames
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2025 23:56:23 +0900

Liu Hui wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2025 at 7:47 PM kobarity <kobarity <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Liu Hui <liuhui1610 <at> gmail.com>
> > > > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 08:45:54 +0800
> > > > Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, michael.albinus <at> gmx.de, 79036 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 11:08 PM kobarity <kobarity <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > For non-file buffers, could it return buffer name instead of <string>?
> > > > > > e.g. #<buffer NAME> or #<NAME> where NAME may need to be quoted. Then
> > > > > > python-pdbtrack-set-tracked-buffer can find it by (get-buffer-create
> > > > > > "NAME").
> > > > >
> > > > > That might be a good idea.  Why is `get-buffer-create' is necessary
> > > > > rather than `get-buffer'?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for pointing it out. get-buffer should be used here.
> > >
> > > So can we please have an updated patch for this?
> >
> > Since it is an improvement to add a new feature and not a fix for
> > #79036, I think it would be better to separate the patches.
> >
> > Attached is my proposed patch to fix #79036.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I find python-shell-send-file has the same issue as
> python-shell-send-string, and
> needs to use correct file-name too.

Thanks, I will update the patch.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.