GNU bug report logs - #79026
30.1; TAB in Minibuffer when using a quail input-method should complete the longest common suffix of candidates

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Cass Alexandru <g.cassian.alexandru <at> posteo.eu>

Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:30:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Found in version 30.1

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Visuwesh <visuweshm <at> gmail.com>
Cc: arash <at> gnu.org, 79026 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, g.cassian.alexandru <at> posteo.eu, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: bug#79026: 30.1; TAB in Minibuffer when using a quail input-method should complete the longest common suffix of candidates
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 11:00:59 +0300
> From: Visuwesh <visuweshm <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: arash <at> gnu.org,  g.cassian.alexandru <at> posteo.eu,  79026 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
>   monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 13:16:54 +0530
> 
> [வியாழன் ஜூலை 17, 2025] Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > IOW, the request here is to make quail-completion work as minibuffer
> > completion works elsewhere.  If you can come up with a patch to do
> > that (probably optionally, given how quail-completion's original
> > behavior was very different), that'd be appreciated.
> 
> If there is only one translation for the current key, it should just
> insert it?  I.e., typing TAB after \alph should insert α.
> 
> If there is more than one, it should complete to the longest possible
> common key i.e., typing TAB after \app should complete to \approx and
> the Quail loop would be active.  Another TAB from here on would pop up
> the *Quail Completions* buffer?

Yes, I think so.

> Did I get it right?  I wonder if we can reuse the completion facility
> for this.

That's the question, yes.




This bug report was last modified 65 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.