GNU bug report logs - #79009
[PATCH] Improve 'vtable' object handling, cache handling, messages

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stéphane Marks <shipmints <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2025 18:08:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Full log


Message #62 received at 79009 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stéphane Marks <shipmints <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: sbaugh <at> janestreet.com, krisbalintona <at> gmail.com, joostkremers <at> fastmail.fm,
 sbaugh <at> catern.com, 79009 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, visuweshm <at> gmail.com,
 adam <at> alphapapa.net, larsi <at> gnus.org, arstoffel <at> gmail.com, ijqq <at> protonmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#79009: [PATCH] Improve 'vtable' object handling, cache
 handling, messages
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 10:22:15 -0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sat, Aug 2, 2025 at 9:47 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> > Cc: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>,
> >  Kristoffer Balintona <krisbalintona <at> gmail.com>,
> >  Joost Kremers <joostkremers <at> fastmail.fm>, 79009 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
> >  Visuwesh <visuweshm <at> gmail.com>, Adam Porter <adam <at> alphapapa.net>,
> >  Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>, Augusto Stoffel <
> arstoffel <at> gmail.com>,
> >  ijqq <at> protonmail.com
> > From: sbaugh <at> catern.com
> > Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 22:02:56 +0000 (UTC)
> >
> > > My patch is self consistent as far as I can tell.
> > >
> > > Once we decide on if we leave equal semantics to the caller, for
> example, vtable-goto-object call site first locating an object on
> > > its own, then relying on eq semantics to move point, or allow users to
> define -object-equal, the rest of my related changes
> > > (coming shortly after we conclude this part of the discussion) have
> more cache items repaired, not just these.
> > >
> > > We can debate simplifying the cache in a new cache-related patch, yes?
> >
> > Sure.  If we debate it in a new patch, then don't change the cache in
> > this patch.  If you want to change the cache in this patch, then we have
> > to debate it now.
>
> Can we please have an updated patch that we could discuss and perhaps
> install?
>

I think the ball is in my court.  I've been on holiday (but obv reading
email) and will get back to this soon.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 20 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.