Subject: bug#78944: 31.0.50; Minibuffer completion

From: Dani Moncayo <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 11:48:30 +0200

On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 10:15 PM Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> >> So, why didn't the initial <TAB> pick the only possible completion alternative?
>
> Because, between the two don't use the same completion style.

OK, I understand.

I'm not sure if/how this behavior could be improved.  Perhaps in the
second <TAB> the completion style should still be the same as the one
used before.

Anyway, I'll let you decide.

Thanks.

-- 
Dani Moncayo