GNU bug report logs - #78921
31.0.50; missing word

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Devon Sean McCullough <Emacs-hacker2023 <at> jovi.net>

Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 23:33:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Found in version 31.0.50

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Full log


Message #15 received at 78921-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Devon Sean McCullough <Emacs-hacker2023 <at> jovi.net>
Cc: 78921-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#78921: 31.0.50; missing word
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 10:19:32 +0300
> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 05:04:45 -0500
> From: Devon Sean McCullough <Emacs-hacker2023 <at> jovi.net>
> 
> On 2025-06-29 00:18, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > tags 78921 notabug
> > thanks
> > 
> >> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 18:31:32 -0500
> >> From: Devon Sean McCullough <Emacs-hacker2023 <at> jovi.net>
> >> 
> >> in info/elisp.info
> >> change *Note Accessing Mouse::.
> >> to *Note Accessing Mouse Events::.
> > 
> > Cross-references in Info state the name of the _node_, not the name of
> > the _section_.  The node is called "Accessing Mouse", the
> > corresponding section's name is "Accessing Mouse Events".
> > 
> > So I think the reference is correct, and this is not a bug.  Am I
> > missing something?
> 
> Sure, clicking gets you there, but being ungrammatical, it stands out 
> like a sore thumb, breaking the reader's flow.
> 
> 		Peace
> 			--Devon
> 
> P.S.  Perhaps "Accessing Mouse Input" or "Accessing Mice" or "Mouse 
> access" or anything that does not look so weird you have the click it to 
> make sure all is well.

Thanks, but I'm not convinced, so I'm closing this bug.




This bug report was last modified 18 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.