Subject: Re: bug#78916: 31.0.50; C-g fails to exit loop

From: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 12:17:20 -0400

>> > So what do we want:
>> > 
>> > - Both keys behave like the "old C-g".
>> > - Both keys behave like the "old C-]" (i.e. what we have now).
>> > - Reintroduce the difference of behavior between `C-g` and `C-]`,
>> >   presumably by giving them different bindings in `query-replace-map.
>> 
>> Is there a use case for the current behavior?  I definitely want to have
>> the "old C-g" behavior available.  I think it makes sense for C-g to
>> provide that behavior.
>
> Agreed.

So IIUC the consensus is:

- Both keys behave like the "old C-g".

?

        Stefan