GNU bug report logs -
#78905
31.0.50; Extra dot in C-h k output
Previous Next
Reported by: Eshel Yaron <me <at> eshelyaron.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 09:53:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 31.0.50
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #26 received at 78905 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net> writes:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 16:05:13 +0300 Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
>>> From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>
>>> Cc: Eshel Yaron <me <at> eshelyaron.com>, 78905 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>>> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 14:47:32 +0200
>>>
>>> Since the sexp `(or remapped menus (princ "."))' is within a sexp
>>> beginning `(when menus ...)' and nothing nullifies `menus' within that
>>> sexp, doesn't this change then make `(princ ".")' a no-op?
>>
>> Sorry, a thinko. The below is better, I hope.
>>
>> diff --git a/lisp/help-fns.el b/lisp/help-fns.el
>> index 481360b..ff69227 100644
>> --- a/lisp/help-fns.el
>> +++ b/lisp/help-fns.el
>> @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ help-fns--key-bindings
>> (format-message "`%s'" remapped)
>> "an anonymous command"))
>> (princ "as well.\n"))
>> - (or remapped (princ "."))
>> + (or remapped (= (point) start) (princ "."))
>> (fill-region-as-paragraph start (point))))
>> (ensure-empty-lines)))))))
>
> Yes, this is effectively equivalent to the patch I posted ;-)
Both variants seem to work over here :)
Thanks,
Eshel
This bug report was last modified 16 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.