Subject: Re: bug#78905: 31.0.50; Extra dot in C-h k output

From: Eshel Yaron <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 16:21:49 +0200

Hi,

Stephen Berman <[email-masked]> writes:

> On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 16:05:13 +0300 Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
>>> From: Stephen Berman <[email-masked]>
>>> Cc: Eshel Yaron <[email-masked]>,  [email-masked]
>>> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 14:47:32 +0200
>>> 
>>> Since the sexp `(or remapped menus (princ "."))' is within a sexp
>>> beginning `(when menus ...)' and nothing nullifies `menus' within that
>>> sexp, doesn't this change then make `(princ ".")' a no-op?
>>
>> Sorry, a thinko.  The below is better, I hope.
>>
>> diff --git a/lisp/help-fns.el b/lisp/help-fns.el
>> index 481360b..ff69227 100644
>> --- a/lisp/help-fns.el
>> +++ b/lisp/help-fns.el
>> @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ help-fns--key-bindings
>>                               (format-message "`%s'" remapped)
>>  		           "an anonymous command"))
>>                    (princ "as well.\n"))
>> -                (or remapped (princ "."))
>> +                (or remapped (= (point) start) (princ "."))
>>                  (fill-region-as-paragraph start (point))))
>>              (ensure-empty-lines)))))))
>
> Yes, this is effectively equivalent to the patch I posted ;-)

Both variants seem to work over here :)

Thanks,

Eshel