GNU bug report logs -
#78890
31.0.50; Messy vc-annotate buffer names
Previous Next
Reported by: Kristoffer Balintona <krisbalintona <at> gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:43:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 31.0.50
Fixed in version 31.1
Done: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On 6/26/2025 8:06 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Removing vc-ensure-vc-buffer was intentional, and it shouldn't just go
> back -- that was part of adding vc-buffer-overriding-fileset. What do
> you both think to something like this:
One small issue I noticed: if you kill the original buffer, then
'file-buffer' will be nil and we fall back to using 'file' when naming
the Annotate buffer. We should probably just use the nondirectory part
of file though. Otherwise, we'd display the absolute filename in the
Annotate buffer name. Something like this patch:
----------------------------------------
diff --git a/lisp/vc/vc-annotate.el b/lisp/vc/vc-annotate.el
index de432e4e1c3..d0077af4db9 100644
--- a/lisp/vc/vc-annotate.el
+++ b/lisp/vc/vc-annotate.el
@@ -419,7 +419,12 @@ vc-annotate
(read-string (format-prompt "Annotate span days" 20)
nil nil "20"))))))))
(setq vc-annotate-display-mode display-mode) ;Not sure why. --Stef
- (let* ((temp-buffer-name (format "*Annotate %s (rev %s)*"
(buffer-name) rev))
+ (let* ((file-buffer (get-file-buffer file))
+ (temp-buffer-name (format "*Annotate %s (rev %s)*"
+ (if file-buffer
+ (buffer-name file-buffer)
+ (file-name-nondirectory file))
+ rev))
(temp-buffer-show-function 'vc-annotate-display-select)
;; If BUF is specified, we presume the caller maintains
current line,
;; so we don't need to do it here. This implementation may give
This bug report was last modified 20 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.